高级搜索

海绵动物对微塑料的生物累积和排出

, 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

王婷婷, 陈荣. 海绵动物对微塑料的生物累积和排出[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(6): 29-36. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20221014001
引用本文: 王婷婷, 陈荣. 海绵动物对微塑料的生物累积和排出[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(6): 29-36. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20221014001
shu
Wang Tingting, Chen Rong. Bioaccumulation and Elimination of Microplastics by Sponges[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2022, 17(6): 29-36. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20221014001
Citation: Wang Tingting, Chen Rong. Bioaccumulation and Elimination of Microplastics by Sponges[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2022, 17(6): 29-36. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20221014001
shu

海绵动物对微塑料的生物累积和排出

  • 厦门大学环境与生态学院，厦门市海湾生态保护与修复重点实验室，厦门 361102

    • 作者简介: 王婷婷(1998-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为生态毒理学,E-mail:3033277695@qq.com
    通讯作者: 陈荣, E-mail: chenrong@xmu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: X171.5

Bioaccumulation and Elimination of Microplastics by Sponges

  • Xiamen City Key Laboratory of Urban Sea Ecological Conservation and Restoration, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China

    • Corresponding author: Chen Rong, chenrong@xmu.edu.cn

摘要

  • 摘要: 海绵动物滤水能力极强，能高效清除水体中的颗粒物质，具有净化海洋环境中微塑料污染的潜力。本文首次开展了蜂海绵(Haliclona simulans)和沐浴海绵(Spongia officinalis)对微塑料的生物累积和排出实验。利用连续暴露实验装置，将蜂海绵和沐浴海绵分别置于不同粒径(＜100 μm、100～300 μm)浓度为5 000 particles·L-1的微塑料悬浮液中暴露100 min，期间每20 min取水样进行微塑料计数，观察海绵对微塑料的生物累积；累积实验结束后，将海绵立即转移到清洁海水中进行排出实验，分别在2、4、8、12、24、48和72 h收集体系中全部的水样和海绵粪便，测定样品中微塑料含量。结果显示，(1)蜂海绵和沐浴海绵均对微塑料表现出较高的累积能力，1 h可清除体系60%以上微塑料。(2)排出实验结果显示，72 h后，蜂海绵体内累积的<100 μm和100～300 μm微塑料总排出比例分别达到(33.90±0.94)%和(28.54±0.40)%；沐浴海绵对2种粒径微塑料的总排出比例分别为(23.01±0.07)%和(18.19±2.97)%，显著低于蜂海绵(P<0.05)，表现出更高的微塑料赋存能力。(3)蜂海绵和沐浴海绵通过水相排出的微塑料占比均略高于粪便相，但无显著差异(P>0.05)。蜂海绵和沐浴海绵都可以通过粪便排出相当比例的微塑料，这有可能增加微塑料通过底栖食物链在海洋生态系统中传递的风险。
    Abstract: Sponges have a high capacity for filtering water and can effectively bioaccumulate microparticulate pollutants. As a result, they have the potential to play a role in cleaning marine microplastic pollution. In this study, we for the first time investigated the bioaccumulation and elimination of microplastics by two sponge species: Haliclona simulans and Spongia officinalis. Sponges were exposed to microplastics of two different sizes (i.e., <100 μm and 100～300 μm) at a concentration of 5 000 particles·L-1 for 100 min using a continuous flow-through exposure design. Water samples were collected every 20 min for microplastic counting to observe the bioaccumulation of microplastics by the sponges. After the exposure period, the sponges were transferred to clean seawater to observe the elimination of microplastics. Water samples and sponge feces were collected to determine the microplastic content at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h. The key findings of the study are as follows: (1) H. simulans and S. officinalis showed a high ability to accumulate microplastics, with no significant interspecies difference. They were able to clear over 60% of the microplastics within 1 h. (2) After 72 h of elimination, H. simulans eliminated (33.90±0.94)% of microplastics of < 100 μm and (28.54±0.40)% of microplastics of 100～300 μm. In comparison, S. officinalis eliminated (23.01±0.07)% of microplastics of < 100 μm and (18.19±2.97)% of microplastics of 100～300 μm, indicating its higher ability to retain microplastics (P<0.05). (3) A slightly higher proportion of microplastics was eliminated into the water than into the feces, although this difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The two sponges in this study were able to eliminate a significant proportion of microplastics through their feces. This raises concerns about the potential for microplastics to be transferred through the benthic food chain and increase the risks in marine ecosystems.
  • 加载中
  • Wagner M, Scherer C, Alvarez-Muñoz D, et al. Microplastics in freshwater ecosystems:What we know and what we need to know[J]. Environmental Sciences Europe, 2014, 26(1):12-21
    Cole M, Lindeque P, Halsband C, et al. Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment:A review[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2011, 62(12):2588-2597
    Fendall L S, Sewell M A. Contributing to marine pollution by washing your face:Microplastics in facial cleansers[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2009, 58(8):1225-1228
    Schwabl P, K ppel S, K nigshofer P, et al. Detection of various microplastics in human stool:A prospective case series[J]. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2019, 171(7):453-457
    Zhang L S, Liu J Y, Xie Y S, et al. Occurrence and removal of microplastics from wastewater treatment plants in a typical tourist city in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 291:125968
    Taha Z D, Md Amin R, Anuar S T, et al. Microplastics in seawater and zooplankton:A case study from Terengganu Estuary and offshore waters, Malaysia[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 786:147466
    Thompson R C, Moore C J, vom Saal F S, et al. Plastics, the environment and human health:Current consensus and future trends[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 2009, 364(1526):2153-2166
    Brennecke D, Duarte B, Paiva F, et al. Microplastics as vector for heavy metal contamination from the marine environment[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2016, 178:189-195
    Tang G W, Liu M Y, Zhou Q, et al. Microplastics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Xiamen coastal areas:Implications for anthropogenic impacts[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 634:811-820
    Sharma M D, Elanjickal A I, Mankar J S, et al. Assessment of cancer risk of microplastics enriched with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 398:122994
    Lamb J B, Willis B L, Fiorenza E A, et al. Plastic waste associated with disease on coral reefs[J]. Science, 2018, 359(6374):460-462
    Andrady A L. Microplastics in the marine environment[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2011, 62(8):1596-1605
    Dubaish F, Liebezeit G. Suspended microplastics and black carbon particles in the jade system, Southern North Sea[J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2013, 224(2):1352-1360
    Li Y Z, Chen G L, Xu K H, et al. Microplastics environmental effect and risk assessment on the aquaculture systems from South China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(4):1869
    Ma J L, Niu X J, Zhang D Q, et al. High levels of microplastic pollution in aquaculture water of fish ponds in the Pearl River Estuary of Guangzhou, China[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 744:140679
    Gündoǧdu S, Eroldoǧan O T, Evliyaoǧlu E, et al. Fish out, plastic in:Global pattern of plastics in commercial fishmeal[J]. Aquaculture, 2021, 534:736316
    Cole M, Lindeque P, Halsband C, et al. Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment:A review[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2011, 62(12):2588-2597
    Lusher A L, McHugh M, Thompson R C. Occurrence of microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract of pelagic and demersal fish from the English Channel[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2013, 67(1-2):94-99
    Buwono N R, Risjani Y, Soegianto A. Contamination of microplastics in Brantas River, East Java, Indonesia and its distribution in gills and digestive tracts of fish Gambusia affinis[J]. Emerging Contaminants, 2021(1):172-178
    Pannetier P, Cachot J, Clérandeau C, et al. Toxicity Assessment of Pollutants Sorbed on Microplastics Using Various Bioassays on Two Fish Cell Lines[M]//Fate and Impact of Microplastics in Marine Ecosystems. Amsterdam:Elsevier, 2017:140-141
    Vendel A L, Bessa F, Alves V E N, et al. Widespread microplastic ingestion by fish assemblages in tropical estuaries subjected to anthropogenic pressures[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2017, 117(1-2):448-455
    Bayne B L, Ahrens M, Allen S K, et al. The proposed dropping of the genus Crassostrea for all Pacific cupped oysters and its replacement by a new genus Magallana: A dissenting view[J]. Journal of Shellfish Research, 2017, 36(3):545-547
    Shore E A, DeMayo J A, Pespeni M H. Microplastics reduce net population growth and fecal pellet sinking rates for the marine copepod, Acartia tonsa[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 284:117379
    Cavalier-Smith T, Allsopp M P, Chao E E, et al. Sponge phylogeny, animal monophyly, and the origin of the nervous system:18S rRNA evidence[J]. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1996, 74(11):2031-2045
    Bell J J, Smith D. Ecology of sponge assemblages (Porifera) in the Wakatobi Region, south-east Sulawesi, Indonesia:Richness and abundance[J]. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2004, 84(3):581-591
    Gargiulo J C. Inside multi-functional aquarium sponge filter:US5203990[P]. 1993-04-20
    Yahel G, Eerkes-Medrano D I, Leys S P. Size independent selective filtration of ultraplankton by hexactinellid glass sponges[J]. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 2006, 45:181-194
    Girard E B, Fuchs A, Kaliwoda M, et al. Sponges as bioindicators for microparticulate pollutants?[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 268(Pt A):115851
    de Mestre C, Maher W, Roberts D, et al. Sponges as sentinels:Patterns of spatial and intra-individual variation in trace metal concentration[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2012, 64(1):80-89
    Gantt S E, López-Legentil S, Erwin P M. Stable microbial communities in the sponge Crambe crambe from inside and outside a polluted Mediterranean Harbor[J]. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2017, 364(11):fnx105
    Aresta A, Nonnis Marzano C, Lopane C, et al. Analytical investigations on the lindane bioremediation capability of the demosponge Hymeniacidon perlevis[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2015, 90(1-2):143-149
    Rao J V, Srikanth K, Pallela R, et al. The use of marine sponge, Haliclona tenuiramosa as bioindicator to monitor heavy metal pollution in the coasts of Gulf of Mannar, India[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2009, 156(1):451
    Wagner C, Steffen R, Koziol C, et al. Apoptosis in marine sponges:A biomarker for environmental stress (cadmium and bacteria)[J]. Marine Biology, 1998, 131(3):411-421
    Longo C, Corriero G, Licciano M, et al. Bacterial accumulation by the Demospongiae Hymeniacidon perlevis:A tool for the bioremediation of polluted seawater[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2010, 60(8):1182-1187
    Chaves-Fonnegra A, Maldonado M, Blackwelder P, et al. Asynchronous reproduction and multi-spawning in the coral-excavating sponge Cliona delitrix[J]. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2016, 96(2):515-528
    Larsen P S, Riisgård H U. Validation of the flow-through chamber (FTC) and steady-state (SS) methods for clearance rate measurements in bivalves[J]. Biology Open, 2012, 1(1):6-11
    Fallon B R, Freeman C J. Plastics in Porifera:The occurrence of potential microplastics in marine sponges and seawater from Bocas del Toro, Panamá[J]. PeerJ, 2021, 9:e11638
    Baird, Clifford Alan. Measuring the effects of microplastics on sponges[D]. Wellington:Te Kura Mātauranga Koiora, 2016:30-32
    Cerrano C, Calcinai B, Camillo C G D, et al. How and why do sponges incorporate foreign material? Strategies in Porifera[M]//Custódio M R, Gisele Lbo-Hajdu, Hajdu E, et al. Porifera Research:Biodiversity, Innovation and Sustainability. Rio de Janeiro:Museu Nacional, 2007:239-246
    Leys S P, Eerkes-Medrano D I. Feeding in a calcareous sponge:Particle uptake by pseudopodia[J]. The Biological Bulletin, 2006, 211(2):157-171
    Coppock R L, Galloway T S, Cole M, et al. Microplastics alter feeding selectivity and faecal density in the copepod, Calanus helgolandicus[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 687:780-789
    Wiens M, Koziol C, Hassanein H, et al. Induction of gene expression of the chaperones 14-3-3 and HSP70 by PCB 118(2,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl) in the marine sponge Geodia cydonium:Novel biomarkers for polychlorinated biphenyls[J]. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 1998, 165:247-257
    Cerrano C, Calcinai B, Cucchiari E, et al. The diversity of relationships between Antarctic sponges and diatoms:The case of Mycale acerata Kirkpatrick, 1907(Porifera, Demospongiae)[J]. Polar Biology, 2004, 27(4):231-237
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2392
  • HTML全文浏览数:  2392
  • PDF下载数:  146
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-10-14
王婷婷, 陈荣. 海绵动物对微塑料的生物累积和排出[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(6): 29-36. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20221014001
引用本文: 王婷婷, 陈荣. 海绵动物对微塑料的生物累积和排出[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(6): 29-36. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20221014001
shu
Wang Tingting, Chen Rong. Bioaccumulation and Elimination of Microplastics by Sponges[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2022, 17(6): 29-36. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20221014001
Citation: Wang Tingting, Chen Rong. Bioaccumulation and Elimination of Microplastics by Sponges[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2022, 17(6): 29-36. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20221014001
shu

海绵动物对微塑料的生物累积和排出

    通讯作者: 陈荣, E-mail: chenrong@xmu.edu.cn
    作者简介: 王婷婷(1998-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为生态毒理学,E-mail:3033277695@qq.com
  • 厦门大学环境与生态学院，厦门市海湾生态保护与修复重点实验室，厦门 361102
  • 收稿日期:  2022-10-14

摘要: 海绵动物滤水能力极强，能高效清除水体中的颗粒物质，具有净化海洋环境中微塑料污染的潜力。本文首次开展了蜂海绵(Haliclona simulans)和沐浴海绵(Spongia officinalis)对微塑料的生物累积和排出实验。利用连续暴露实验装置，将蜂海绵和沐浴海绵分别置于不同粒径(＜100 μm、100～300 μm)浓度为5 000 particles·L-1的微塑料悬浮液中暴露100 min，期间每20 min取水样进行微塑料计数，观察海绵对微塑料的生物累积；累积实验结束后，将海绵立即转移到清洁海水中进行排出实验，分别在2、4、8、12、24、48和72 h收集体系中全部的水样和海绵粪便，测定样品中微塑料含量。结果显示，(1)蜂海绵和沐浴海绵均对微塑料表现出较高的累积能力，1 h可清除体系60%以上微塑料。(2)排出实验结果显示，72 h后，蜂海绵体内累积的<100 μm和100～300 μm微塑料总排出比例分别达到(33.90±0.94)%和(28.54±0.40)%；沐浴海绵对2种粒径微塑料的总排出比例分别为(23.01±0.07)%和(18.19±2.97)%，显著低于蜂海绵(P<0.05)，表现出更高的微塑料赋存能力。(3)蜂海绵和沐浴海绵通过水相排出的微塑料占比均略高于粪便相，但无显著差异(P>0.05)。蜂海绵和沐浴海绵都可以通过粪便排出相当比例的微塑料，这有可能增加微塑料通过底栖食物链在海洋生态系统中传递的风险。

English Abstract

参考文献 (43)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心

京ICP备05002858号-9