高级搜索

不同粒径商品聚乙烯微塑料对2种蔬菜种子发芽和幼苗生长的影响

,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

栗敏, 刘强, 曹东东, 邵梦莹, 刘一帆, 罗先香, 李锋民, 郑浩. 不同粒径商品聚乙烯微塑料对2种蔬菜种子发芽和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(6): 419-433. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20211220001
引用本文: 栗敏, 刘强, 曹东东, 邵梦莹, 刘一帆, 罗先香, 李锋民, 郑浩. 不同粒径商品聚乙烯微塑料对2种蔬菜种子发芽和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(6): 419-433. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20211220001
shu
Li Min, Liu Qiang, Cao Dongdong, Shao Mengying, Liu Yifan, Luo Xianxiang, Li Fengmin, Zheng Hao. Effects of Different Commercial Polyethylene Microplastics with Different Particle Sizes on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Two Vegetables[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2022, 17(6): 419-433. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20211220001
Citation: Li Min, Liu Qiang, Cao Dongdong, Shao Mengying, Liu Yifan, Luo Xianxiang, Li Fengmin, Zheng Hao. Effects of Different Commercial Polyethylene Microplastics with Different Particle Sizes on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Two Vegetables[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2022, 17(6): 419-433. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20211220001
shu

不同粒径商品聚乙烯微塑料对2种蔬菜种子发芽和幼苗生长的影响

  • 1. 中国海洋大学近海环境污染控制研究所，海洋环境与生态教育部重点实验室，青岛 266100;

  • 2. 青岛海洋科学与技术国家实验室，海洋生态与环境科学功能实验室，青岛 266237

    • 作者简介: 栗敏(1996-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为新型污染物的生态毒性效应,E-mail:676468590@qq.com
    通讯作者: 郑浩, E-mail: zhenghao2013@ouc.edu.cn
  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(42077115)；山东省自然科学基金杰出青年基金(ZR2021JQ13)

  • 中图分类号: X171.5

Effects of Different Commercial Polyethylene Microplastics with Different Particle Sizes on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Two Vegetables

  • 1. Institute of Coastal Environmental Pollution Control, Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Ecology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China;

  • 2. Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental Science, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China

    • Corresponding author: Zheng Hao, zhenghao2013@ouc.edu.cn
  • Fund Project:

摘要

  • 摘要: 陆地生态系统中微塑料(MPs)污染问题已成为全球关注的热点环境问题。MPs对土壤生物的影响表现出生态毒性和遗传毒性，但不同粒径MPs对典型农作物生长的影响有待深入研究。因此，本研究通过发芽实验和盆栽实验研究不同粒径(23 μm、54 μm和155 μm)的聚乙烯MPs(PE-MPs)在不同污染浓度下(0.1%、0.5%、1%、2%和5% (m∶m))对西红柿(Lycopersicon esculentum)和辣椒(Capsicum annuum L.)种子发芽、幼苗生长及根系发育的影响。结果表明，3种粒径的PE-MPs对2种作物发芽的影响存在差异。对西红柿，不同粒径的PE-MPs在高浓度(5%)下均显著抑制了种子发芽，降低了种子活性，但并无显著的粒径差异。对辣椒而言，不同粒径的PE-MPs在5%的暴露浓度下均显著降低了辣椒种子活性，且23 μm的PE-MPs抑制程度最大，但仅23 μm和54 μm的PE-MPs显著抑制了种子的发芽。盆栽实验表明，23 μm的PE-MPs在5%的暴露浓度下显著抑制了西红柿和辣椒幼苗的生长，54 μm和155 μm的PE-MPs对其影响较小。此外，对根系发育而言，2%和5%浓度的23 μm的PE-MPs暴露下，西红柿根系变得细长，但对辣椒根系无显著影响。PE-MPs对2种作物发芽的抑制效应可能是由于其在种子表皮和根毛上积累，造成物理堵塞，抑制了对水分和营养物质的吸收导致的。PE-MPs还可能通过释放添加剂对植物生长造成毒性，抑制其对水分及营养元素的吸收，改变幼苗酶活性，扰乱作物中的氧化还原稳态抑制植物幼苗生长。本研究为深入评估农业生态系统中不同粒径PE-MPs污染的生态风险提供了基础数据。
    Abstract: Microplastics (MPs) pollution in terrestrial ecosystems has become a hotspot environmental issue. MPs in soils showed ecotoxicity to soil organisms, but the effects of MPs with different particle sizes on the growth of typical crops are still unclear. Therefore, three polyethylene MPs (PE-MPs) with different particle sizes of 23 μm, 54 μm and 155 μm were selected to investigate their effects on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) including seed germination, seedling growth and root development under the different exposure concentrations of 0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, 2% and 5% (m/m) using seed germination experiments and pot experiments. The results showed that the effects of PE-MPs with three different particle sizes on the germination of two crops were different. For tomato, PE-MPs with different particle sizes significantly inhibited the germination and activity of seeds at the highest concentration of 5%, but little difference was observed among the different sized MP treatments. For pepper, PE-MPs with the different particle sizes significantly decreased the seed activity at the highest exposure concentration of 5%, and 23 μm PE-MPs showed the greatest inhibited effect on the seedling growth. However, only 23 μm and 54 μm PE-MPs posed significant inhibition on the germination of pepper. In the pot experiment, 23 μm PE-MPs significantly inhibited the seedling growth of tomato and pepper under the highest exposure concentration, while 54 μm and 155 μm PE-MPs showed non-significant effect on the seedling growth of tomato and pepper. In addition, tomato roots were elongated under the exposure of 23 μm PE-MP at the concentration of 2% and 5%, but little effect were observed on the pepper root growth. The inhibitory effect of PE-MPs on the germination of the two crop seeds could be ascribed to the accumulation of PE-MPs on the seed epidermis and root hair, which consequently could result in the physical blockage and inhibition of water and nutrient uptake. In the soil environment, PE-MPs could inhibit plant uptake of water and nutrients, reduce the enzyme activity of seedlings, disrupt the redox homeostasis, thereby inhibiting the seedling growth. These findings provide the scientific basis for evaluating the ecological risk of MPs in agricultural ecosystems.
  • 加载中
  • Thompson R C, Olsen Y, Mitchell R P, et al. Lost at sea:Where is all the plastic?[J]. Science, 2004, 304(5672):838
    Ryan P G, Moore C J, van Franeker J A, et al. Monitoring the abundance of plastic debris in the marine environment[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 2009, 364(1526):1999-2012
    Alimi O S, Farner Budarz J, Hernandez L M, et al. Microplastics and nanoplastics in aquatic environments:Aggregation, deposition, and enhanced contaminant transport[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(4):1704-1724
    de Souza Machado A A, Kloas W, Zarfl C, et al. Microplastics as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Global Change Biology, 2018, 24(4):1405-1416
    Auta H S, Emenike C U, Fauziah S H. Distribution and importance of microplastics in the marine environment:A review of the sources, fate, effects, and potential solutions[J]. Environment International, 2017, 102:165-176
    Horton A A, Walton A, Spurgeon D J, et al. Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments:Evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 586:127-141
    Lebreton L C M, van der Zwet J, Damsteeg J W, et al. River plastic emissions to the world's oceans[J]. Nature Communications, 2017, 8:15611
    Corradini F, Casado F, Leiva V, et al. Microplastics occurrence and frequency in soils under different land uses on a regional scale[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 752:141917
    骆永明, 周倩, 章海波, 等. 重视土壤中微塑料污染研究防范生态与食物链风险[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(10):1021-1030

    Luo Y M, Zhou Q, Zhang H B, et al. Pay attention to research on microplastic pollution in soil for prevention of ecological and food chain risks[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018, 33(10):1021-1030(in Chinese)

    Guo J J, Huang X P, Xiang L, et al. Source, migration and toxicology of microplastics in soil[J]. Environment International, 2020, 137:105263
    马兆嵘, 刘有胜, 张芊芊, 等. 农用塑料薄膜使用现状与环境污染分析[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2020, 15(4):21-32

    Ma Z R, Liu Y S, Zhang Q Q, et al. The usage and environmental pollution of agricultural plastic film[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2020, 15(4):21-32(in Chinese)

    Ragoobur D, Huerta-Lwanga E, Somaroo G D. Microplastics in agricultural soils, wastewater effluents and sewage sludge in Mauritius[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 798:149326
    Zhang L S, Xie Y S, Liu J Y, et al. An overlooked entry pathway of microplastics into agricultural soils from application of sludge-based fertilizers[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(7):4248-4255
    涂晨, 田媛, 刘颖, 等. 大连海岸带夏、秋季大气沉降(微)塑料的赋存特征及其表面生物膜特性[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(4):1821-1828

    Tu C, Tian Y, Liu Y, et al. Occurrence of atmospheric(micro)plastics and the characteristics of the plastic associated biofilms in the coastal zone of Dalian in summer and autumn[J]. Environmental Science, 2022, 43(4):1821-1828(in Chinese)

    Halley P, Rutgers R, Coombs S, et al. Developing biodegradable mulch films from starch-based polymers[J]. Starch -Stärke, 2001, 53(8):362
    Shogren R L, Hochmuth R C. Field evaluation of watermelon grown on paper-polymerized vegetable oil mulches[J]. HortScience, 2004, 39(7):1588-1591
    赵岩, 陈学庚, 温浩军, 等. 农田残膜污染治理技术研究现状与展望[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(6):1-14

    Zhao Y, Chen X G, Wen H J, et al. Research status and prospect of control technology for residual plastic film pollution in farmland[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(6):1-14(in Chinese)

    de Souza Machado A A, Lau C W, Till J, et al. Impacts of microplastics on the soil biophysical environment[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(17):9656-9665
    Seeley M E, Song B, Passie R, et al. Microplastics affect sedimentary microbial communities and nitrogen cycling[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11:2372
    Yu H W, Qi W X, Cao X F, et al. Microplastic residues in wetland ecosystems:Do they truly threaten the plant-microbe-soil system?[J]. Environment International, 2021, 156:106708
    Qi Y L, Yang X M, Pelaez A M, et al. Macro-and micro-plastics in soil-plant system:Effects of plastic mulch film residues on wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 645:1048-1056
    Boots B, Russell C W, Green D S. Effects of microplastics in soil ecosystems:Above and below ground[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(19):11496-11506
    Li L Z, Luo Y M, Li R J, et al. Effective uptake of submicrometre plastics by crop plants via a crack-entry mode[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3(11):929-937
    Lozano Y M, Rillig M C. Effects of microplastic fibers and drought on plant communities[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(10):6166-6173
    de Souza Machado A A, Lau C W, Kloas W, et al. Microplastics can change soil properties and affect plant performance[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(10):6044-6052
    Lian J P, Wu J, Xiong H, et al. Impact of polystyrene nanoplastics (PSNPs) on seed germination and seedling growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 385:121620
    Rogers E D, Benfey P N. Regulation of plant root system architecture:Implications for crop advancement[J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2015, 32:93-98
    Sun X D, Yuan X Z, Jia Y B, et al. Differentially charged nanoplastics demonstrate distinct accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2020, 15(9):755-760
    Barros L, Dueñas M, Pinela J, et al. Characterization and quantification of phenolic compounds in four tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) farmers' varieties in northeastern Portugal homegardens[J]. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 2012, 67(3):229-234
    Wahyuni Y, Ballester A R, Tikunov Y, et al. Metabolomics and molecular marker analysis to explore pepper (Capsicum sp.) biodiversity[J]. Metabolomics:Official Journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2013, 9(1):130-144
    Li Z W, Hu X L, Qin L X, et al. Evaluating the effect of different modified microplastics on the availability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons[J]. Water Research, 2020, 170:115290
    Xu E G, Lin N, Cheong R S, et al. Artificial turf infill associated with systematic toxicity in an amniote vertebrate[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019, 116(50):25156-25161
    韩丽花, 李巧玲, 徐笠, 等. 大辽河流域土壤中微塑料的丰度与分布研究[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2020, 15(1):174-185

    Han L H, Li Q L, Xu L, et al. Abundance and distribution of microplastics of soils in Daliao River Basin[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2020, 15(1):174-185(in Chinese)

    Leifheit E F, Kissener H L, Faltin E, et al. Tire abrasion particles negatively affect plant growth even at low concentrations and alter soil biogeochemical cycling[J]. Soil Ecology Letters, 2022, 4(4):409-415
    Liu G, Jiang R F, You J, et al. Microplastic impacts on microalgae growth:Effects of size and humic acid[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(3):1782-1789
    de Geyter N, Morent R, Leys C. Surface characterization of plasma-modified polyethylene by contact angle experiments and ATR-FTIR spectroscopy[J]. Surface and Interface Analysis, 2008, 40(3-4):608-611
    Browne M A, Crump P, Niven S J, et al. Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines woldwide:Sources and sinks[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(21):9175-9179
    Li X Y, Zhang H F, Li J, et al. Improving the aromatic production in catalytic fast pyrolysis of cellulose by co-feeding low-density polyethylene[J]. Applied Catalysis A:General, 2013, 455:114-121
    Song J, Na J, An D, et al. Role of benzophenone-3 additive in chronic toxicity of polyethylene microplastic fragments to Daphnia magna[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 800:149638
    Romera-Castillo C, Pinto M, Langer T M, et al. Dissolved organic carbon leaching from plastics stimulates microbial activity in the ocean[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1):1430
    Rajjou L, Duval M, Gallardo K, et al. Seed germination and vigor[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2012, 63:507-533
    Bosker T, Bouwman L J, Brun N R, et al. Microplastics accumulate on pores in seed capsule and delay germination and root growth of the terrestrial vascular plant Lepidium sativum[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 226:774-781
    Li S X, Wang T Y, Guo J H, et al. Polystyrene microplastics disturb the redox homeostasis, carbohydrate metabolism and phytohormone regulatory network in barley[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 415:125614
    Ma X M, Geiser-Lee J, Deng Y, et al. Interactions between engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and plants:Phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 408(16):3053-3061
    Urbina M A, Correa F, Aburto F, et al. Adsorption of polyethylene microbeads and physiological effects on hydroponic maize[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 741:140216
    Fauser P, Vorkamp K, Strand J. Residual additives in marine microplastics and their risk assessment -A critical review[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2022, 177:113467
    Wei Z, Yang T J, Friman V P, et al. Trophic network architecture of root-associated bacterial communities determines pathogen invasion and plant health[J]. Nature Communications, 2015, 6:8413
    Dong Y M, Gao M L, Qiu W W, et al. Effect of microplastics and arsenic on nutrients and microorganisms in rice rhizosphere soil[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2021, 211:111899
    贾雨薇, 赵建亮, 于旭彪, 等. 微塑料对疏水性有机污染物的生物富集影响研究进展[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2019, 14(6):1-10

    Jia Y W, Zhao J L, Yu X B, et al. Resent advances on the effects of microplastics on bioaccumulation of hydrophobic organic pollutants[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2019, 14(6):1-10(in Chinese)

    Li L, Tilman D, Lambers H, et al. Plant diversity and overyielding:Insights from belowground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture[J]. The New Phytologist, 2014, 203(1):63-69
    Ca as J E, Long M, Nations S, et al. Effects of functionalized and nonfunctionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes on root elongation of select crop species[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2008, 27(9):1922-1931
    Hayes M A, Jesse A, Tabet B, et al. The contrasting effects of nutrient enrichment on growth, biomass allocation and decomposition of plant tissue in coastal wetlands[J]. Plant and Soil, 2017, 416(1):193-204
  • 加载中
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7访问量Chart context menu近一年内文章摘要浏览量、全文浏览量、PDF下载量统计信息摘要浏览量全文浏览量PDF下载量2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menu访问类别分布DOWNLOAD: 2.9 %DOWNLOAD: 2.9 %HTML全文: 86.3 %HTML全文: 86.3 %摘要: 10.8 %摘要: 10.8 %DOWNLOADHTML全文摘要Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menu访问地区分布其他: 88.8 %其他: 88.8 %Amsterdam: 0.3 %Amsterdam: 0.3 %Anwo: 0.4 %Anwo: 0.4 %Beijing: 2.7 %Beijing: 2.7 %Chicago: 0.1 %Chicago: 0.1 %Chongqing: 0.1 %Chongqing: 0.1 %Montreal: 0.1 %Montreal: 0.1 %Mountain View: 0.1 %Mountain View: 0.1 %Qingzhou: 0.7 %Qingzhou: 0.7 %Shanghai: 0.1 %Shanghai: 0.1 %XX: 5.6 %XX: 5.6 %Yinchuan: 0.1 %Yinchuan: 0.1 %Yuncheng: 0.1 %Yuncheng: 0.1 %Zunyi Shi: 0.3 %Zunyi Shi: 0.3 %北京: 0.1 %北京: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %其他AmsterdamAnwoBeijingChicagoChongqingMontrealMountain ViewQingzhouShanghaiXXYinchuanYunchengZunyi Shi北京濮阳长春Highcharts.com
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2956
  • HTML全文浏览数:  2956
  • PDF下载数:  157
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-12-20
栗敏, 刘强, 曹东东, 邵梦莹, 刘一帆, 罗先香, 李锋民, 郑浩. 不同粒径商品聚乙烯微塑料对2种蔬菜种子发芽和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(6): 419-433. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20211220001
引用本文: 栗敏, 刘强, 曹东东, 邵梦莹, 刘一帆, 罗先香, 李锋民, 郑浩. 不同粒径商品聚乙烯微塑料对2种蔬菜种子发芽和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(6): 419-433. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20211220001
shu
Li Min, Liu Qiang, Cao Dongdong, Shao Mengying, Liu Yifan, Luo Xianxiang, Li Fengmin, Zheng Hao. Effects of Different Commercial Polyethylene Microplastics with Different Particle Sizes on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Two Vegetables[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2022, 17(6): 419-433. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20211220001
Citation: Li Min, Liu Qiang, Cao Dongdong, Shao Mengying, Liu Yifan, Luo Xianxiang, Li Fengmin, Zheng Hao. Effects of Different Commercial Polyethylene Microplastics with Different Particle Sizes on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Two Vegetables[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2022, 17(6): 419-433. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20211220001
shu

不同粒径商品聚乙烯微塑料对2种蔬菜种子发芽和幼苗生长的影响

    通讯作者: 郑浩, E-mail: zhenghao2013@ouc.edu.cn
    作者简介: 栗敏(1996-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为新型污染物的生态毒性效应,E-mail:676468590@qq.com
  • 1. 中国海洋大学近海环境污染控制研究所，海洋环境与生态教育部重点实验室，青岛 266100;
  • 2. 青岛海洋科学与技术国家实验室，海洋生态与环境科学功能实验室，青岛 266237
  • 收稿日期:  2021-12-20
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(42077115)；山东省自然科学基金杰出青年基金(ZR2021JQ13)

摘要: 陆地生态系统中微塑料(MPs)污染问题已成为全球关注的热点环境问题。MPs对土壤生物的影响表现出生态毒性和遗传毒性，但不同粒径MPs对典型农作物生长的影响有待深入研究。因此，本研究通过发芽实验和盆栽实验研究不同粒径(23 μm、54 μm和155 μm)的聚乙烯MPs(PE-MPs)在不同污染浓度下(0.1%、0.5%、1%、2%和5% (m∶m))对西红柿(Lycopersicon esculentum)和辣椒(Capsicum annuum L.)种子发芽、幼苗生长及根系发育的影响。结果表明，3种粒径的PE-MPs对2种作物发芽的影响存在差异。对西红柿，不同粒径的PE-MPs在高浓度(5%)下均显著抑制了种子发芽，降低了种子活性，但并无显著的粒径差异。对辣椒而言，不同粒径的PE-MPs在5%的暴露浓度下均显著降低了辣椒种子活性，且23 μm的PE-MPs抑制程度最大，但仅23 μm和54 μm的PE-MPs显著抑制了种子的发芽。盆栽实验表明，23 μm的PE-MPs在5%的暴露浓度下显著抑制了西红柿和辣椒幼苗的生长，54 μm和155 μm的PE-MPs对其影响较小。此外，对根系发育而言，2%和5%浓度的23 μm的PE-MPs暴露下，西红柿根系变得细长，但对辣椒根系无显著影响。PE-MPs对2种作物发芽的抑制效应可能是由于其在种子表皮和根毛上积累，造成物理堵塞，抑制了对水分和营养物质的吸收导致的。PE-MPs还可能通过释放添加剂对植物生长造成毒性，抑制其对水分及营养元素的吸收，改变幼苗酶活性，扰乱作物中的氧化还原稳态抑制植物幼苗生长。本研究为深入评估农业生态系统中不同粒径PE-MPs污染的生态风险提供了基础数据。

English Abstract

参考文献 (52)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心

京ICP备05002858号-9