2017 Volume 11 Issue 9
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Previous Article Next Article

WEI Jia, LI Qusheng, XU Zhimin, ZHOU Xuefang, YANG Yaoshuai, CHEN Kehan, LIN Xin. Mobilization effects of various organic acids on cadmium carbonate in soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(9): 5298-5306. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201612218
Citation: WEI Jia, LI Qusheng, XU Zhimin, ZHOU Xuefang, YANG Yaoshuai, CHEN Kehan, LIN Xin. Mobilization effects of various organic acids on cadmium carbonate in soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(9): 5298-5306. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201612218
shu

Mobilization effects of various organic acids on cadmium carbonate in soil

  • 1.

    Key Laboratory of Environmental Exposure and Health of Guangzhou City, School of Environment, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China

  • 2.

    Guangdong Provincial Research Center of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Material, Guangzhou 510632, China

  • Received Date: 25/04/2017
    Accepted Date: 29/12/2016
    Available Online: 26/08/2017
    Fund Project:
  • This paper investigated the impact of 44 organic acids on mobilization of cadmium carbonate. The impact of five organic acids with best performance on Cd mobilization in garden soil was also examined. The results showed that the mobilization ability of low molecular weight organic acids (LMWOAs), phenolic acids (PAs) and amino acids (AAs) on cadmium carbonate were significantly different. The mobilization ability of LMWOAs was stronger than PAs and AAs. The mobilization rates of oxalic acid and citric acid were 7.48% and 7.06%, respectively. Based on equivalent molarity of organic acid, the mobilized Cd by citric acid was 22.73 mg·L-1, followed by malic acid and cis-aconitic acid, which were 14.55 mg·L-1 and 12.75 mg·L-1, respectively. The effect of PAs mobilization is not obvious. Among AAs, the mobilization effect of aspartic acid, histidine and glutamate was relatively strong and the rest were not significant. The main mechanism of Cd mobilization by citric acid was complexing, while the acid-soluble effect mainly contributes to Cd mobilization by oxalic acid. The citric acid with strongest ability to cadmium carbonate mobilization also had strongest ability to mobilize Cd in sewage-irrigated soil, and its mobilized Cd concentration reached the level of food safety risk.
  • [1] WANG X, LIANG C H, YIN Y. Distribution and transformation of cadmium formations amended with serpentine and lime in contaminated meadow soil[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2015, 15(7):1531-1537

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [2] GARAU G, CASTALDI P, SANTONA L, et al. Influence of red mud, zeolite and lime on heavy metal immobilization, culturable heterotrophic microbial populations and enzyme activities in a contaminated soil[J]. Geoderma, 2007, 142(1/2):47-57

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [3] LIU W, YANG Y S, LI P J, et al. Risk assessment of cadmium-contaminated soil on plant DNA damage using RAPD and physiological indices[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 161(2/3):878-883

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [4] SUN Y B, SUN G H, XU Y M, et al. Assessment of sepiolite for immobilization of cadmium-contaminated soils[J]. Geoderma, 2013, 193-194:149-155

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [5] BABAK B, MADJID D, MIKLAS S. Response of vegetables to cadmium-enriched soil[J]. Water, 2014,6(5):1246-1256

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [6] 李取生,楚蓓,石雷,等.珠江口滩涂湿地土壤重金属分布及其对围垦的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2007, 26(4):1422-1426

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [7] YANG Y M, NAN Z R, ZHAO Z J, et al. Bioaccumulation and translocation of cadmium in cole (Brassica campestris L.) and celery (Apium graveolens) grown in the polluted oasis soil, Northwest of China[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2011, 23(8):1368-1374

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [8] TESSIER A, CAMPBELL P G C, BISSON M. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 1979, 51(7):844-851

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [9] SILVEIRA M L, ALLEONI L R F, O'CONNOR A G, et al. Heavy metal sequential extraction methods a modification for tropical soils[J]. Chemosphere, 2006, 64(11):1929-1938

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [10] MICHAEL W, EVANGELOU H, HATICE D, et al. The influence of humic acids on the phytoextraction of cadmium from soil[J]. Chemosphere, 2004, 57:207-213

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [11] 李花粉,郑志宇,张福锁,等.铁对小麦吸收不同形态镉的影响[J].生态学报, 1999, 19(2):170-173

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [12] 赵转军,南忠仁,王兆炜,等.Cd、Zn复合污染菜地土壤中重金属形态分布与植物有效性[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 46(2):1-5

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [13] 胡妮,陈柯罕,李取生,等.盐胁迫下苋菜品种有机酸变化对Cd累积和耐盐性的影响[J].农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(5):858-864

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [14] ZENG F R, CHEN S, MIAO Y, et al. Changes of organic acid exudation and rhizosphere pH in rice plants under chromium stress[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2008, 155(2):284-289

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [15] BAO T, SUN T H, SUN L N. Low molecular weight organic acids in root exudates and cadmium accumulation in cadmium hyper accumulator Solanum nigrum L. and non-hyper accumulator Solanum lycopersicum L.[J]. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2011, 10(75):11718-17180

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [16] STANHOPE K G, YOUNG S D, HUTCHINSON J J, et al. Use of isotopic dilution techniques to assess the mobilization of non-labile Cd by chelating agents in phytoremediation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2000, 19(3):152-155

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [17] MENCH M,MARTIN E. Mobilization of cadmium and other metals from two soils by root eaudates of Zen mays L., Nicotyiana tabarum L. and Nicotiana rustion L.[J]. Plant and Soil, 1991, 132(2):187-196

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [18] ELLOIT H A, HUANG C P. Adsorption of some Cu-amino acid complex at soild-solution interface[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1980, 14:87-93

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [19] 朱秀芳, 曹秋娥, 汪国松,等. 以氢化阿魏酸为假模板制备的印迹聚合物对阿魏酸的识别[J]. 分析化学, 2006, 34(s1):118-122

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [20] 黄世超. 若干丹参酚酸的降解和解离性质研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2016

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [21] 张英华. 中药前胡、常山及水杨酸、原儿茶酸的荧光光谱研究[D]. 石家庄:河北师范大学, 2006

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [22] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1999

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [23] 王淑君,胡红青,李珍,等.有机酸对污染土壤中铜和镉的浸提效果[J].农业环境科学学报, 2008, 27(4):1627-1632

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [24] 杜彩艳,祖艳群,李元.石灰配施猪粪对Cd, Pb和Zn污染土壤中重金属形态和植物有效性的影响[J].武汉植物学研究, 2008, 26(2):170-174

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [25] 陈媛.土壤中镉及镉的赋存形态研究进展[J].广东微量元素科学, 2007, 14(7):7-13

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [26] KIM J O, LEE Y W, CHUNG J. The role of organic acids in the mobilization of heavy metals from soil[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2013, 17:1596-1602

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [27] 胡群群, 李志安, 黄宏星, 等. 柠檬酸促进土壤镉解吸的机理研究[J].生态环境学报, 2011, 20(Z2):1338-1342

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [28] JIANG H, LI T, HAN X, et al. Effects of pH and low molecular weight organic acids on competitive adsorption and desorption of cadmium and lead in paddy soils[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2012, 184:6325-6335

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [29] 陈传平,固旭,周苏闽,等.不同有机酸对矿物溶解的动力学实验研究[J].地质学报, 2008, 82(7):1008-1012

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [30] 何发虎,毛希安.水溶液中组氨酸与金属镉离子配位点的研究[J].波谱学杂志, 1996, 13(1):25-33

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [31] YANG Y Y, JUNG J Y, SONG W Y, et al. Identification of rice varieties with high tolerance or sensitivity to lead and characterization of the mechanism of tolerance[J]. Plant Physiology, 2000, 124(3):1019-1026

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [32] WUANA R A, OKIEIMEN F E, IMBORVUNGU J A. Removal of heavy metals from a contaminated soil using organic chelating acids[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2010, 7(3):485-496

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [33] HE B Y, YU D P, CHEN Y, et al. Use of low-calcium cultivars to reduce cadmium uptake and accumulation in edible amaranth(Amaranthus mangostanus L.)[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 171:588-594

    Google Scholar Pub Med

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-050Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionDOWNLOAD: 3.2 %DOWNLOAD: 3.2 %FULLTEXT: 86.3 %FULLTEXT: 86.3 %META: 10.4 %META: 10.4 %DOWNLOADFULLTEXTMETAHighcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 89.6 %其他: 89.6 %Ashburn: 1.2 %Ashburn: 1.2 %Beijing: 1.7 %Beijing: 1.7 %El Paso: 0.2 %El Paso: 0.2 %Guangzhou Shi: 0.2 %Guangzhou Shi: 0.2 %Kunshan: 0.2 %Kunshan: 0.2 %Mountain View: 0.2 %Mountain View: 0.2 %Shanghai: 0.2 %Shanghai: 0.2 %Shangqiu: 0.3 %Shangqiu: 0.3 %Shapingba District: 0.2 %Shapingba District: 0.2 %Shijiazhuang: 0.2 %Shijiazhuang: 0.2 %Xingfeng: 0.2 %Xingfeng: 0.2 %XX: 1.4 %XX: 1.4 %Yuncheng: 0.2 %Yuncheng: 0.2 %内网IP: 0.2 %内网IP: 0.2 %北京: 1.0 %北京: 1.0 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %成都: 0.2 %成都: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %郑州: 2.2 %郑州: 2.2 %其他AshburnBeijingEl PasoGuangzhou ShiKunshanMountain ViewShanghaiShangqiuShapingba DistrictShijiazhuangXingfengXXYuncheng内网IP北京台州呼和浩特成都济南郑州Highcharts.com

  • Cited by

    1. 李宛蔚，李海燕，秦樊鑫. 外源施加钙对土壤镉形态的影响研究. 应用化工. 2024(06): 1290-1292+1297 .
    2. 靳晓东，王霞，张晓静，周建. 铅镉胁迫下柠檬酸、胡敏酸对刺槐幼苗根系发育及土壤特性的影响. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报. 2022(03): 8-13+34 .
    3. 张玉坤，高夕彤，王小敏，段亚军，吕诗，王雪，路倩影，冯圣东，杨志新. 两种积累型番茄对不同难溶态Cd活化与吸收的差异. 中国生态农业学报(中英文). 2022(08): 1355-1361 .
    4. 贾睿琪，郭子昂，姚晨，李璞，腊贵晓，陆夏梓，郭虹妤，李烜桢. 低磷胁迫对小麦镉吸收的影响. 中国农业科技导报. 2022(08): 154-160 .
    5. 唐棋，伍港繁，辜娇峰，周航，曾鹏，廖柏寒. 柠檬酸及刈割强化象草修复镉污染土壤的效应. 环境科学. 2022(09): 4810-4819 .
    6. 谢伟芳，王文华，彭宇涛，程婷，张邦喜. 不同有机酸对小白菜镉污染毒性和品质的影响. 北方园艺. 2021(06): 42-47 .
    7. 傅校锋，刘杰，龙玉梅，孟德佳. 强化青葙修复镉污染土壤的柠檬酸施用方式优化试验研究. 土壤. 2020(01): 153-159 .
    8. 窦韦强，安毅，秦莉，林大松，曾庆楠，夏晴. 土壤pH对镉形态影响的研究进展. 土壤. 2020(03): 439-444 .
    9. 黄敬，龙坚，蒋凯，唐盛爽，覃建军，李欣阳，杨强，侯红波，彭佩钦，廖柏寒. 外源有机酸对不同土壤中Cd解吸行为的影响. 环境生态学. 2019(04): 54-62 .
    10. 吴丽萍，白雯宇，文科军，李可，危硕. 模拟根系分泌有机酸对焚烧炉渣重金属的溶出特征. 环境工程学报. 2018(08): 2220-2230 .
    11. 王东升，王立立，李取生，周婷，周雪芳，高琼. 产铁载体菌对龙葵修复土壤Cd污染的促进效应. 环境工程学报. 2018(08): 2311-2319 .
    12. 林欣，王立立，杨平，李取生，徐智敏，魏佳，周婷. 一株溶磷菌对盐地碱蓬修复盐渍土Cd污染的促进效应. 农业环境科学学报. 2018(05): 883-891 .
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Export Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(1883) PDF downloads(485) Cited by(35)

Access History

Mobilization effects of various organic acids on cadmium carbonate in soil

  • Received Date: 25/04/2017
  • Accepted Date: 29/12/2016
  • Available Online: 26/08/2017
Fund Project:

Abstract: This paper investigated the impact of 44 organic acids on mobilization of cadmium carbonate. The impact of five organic acids with best performance on Cd mobilization in garden soil was also examined. The results showed that the mobilization ability of low molecular weight organic acids (LMWOAs), phenolic acids (PAs) and amino acids (AAs) on cadmium carbonate were significantly different. The mobilization ability of LMWOAs was stronger than PAs and AAs. The mobilization rates of oxalic acid and citric acid were 7.48% and 7.06%, respectively. Based on equivalent molarity of organic acid, the mobilized Cd by citric acid was 22.73 mg·L-1, followed by malic acid and cis-aconitic acid, which were 14.55 mg·L-1 and 12.75 mg·L-1, respectively. The effect of PAs mobilization is not obvious. Among AAs, the mobilization effect of aspartic acid, histidine and glutamate was relatively strong and the rest were not significant. The main mechanism of Cd mobilization by citric acid was complexing, while the acid-soluble effect mainly contributes to Cd mobilization by oxalic acid. The citric acid with strongest ability to cadmium carbonate mobilization also had strongest ability to mobilize Cd in sewage-irrigated soil, and its mobilized Cd concentration reached the level of food safety risk.

    HTML

Reference (33)

Catalog

  • HTML

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return

All rights reserved: Reesearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences,Chinese Academy of Sciences Copyright © 1997-2016

Address:  Postcode: 100085 Phone: 010-62941074 E-mail: cjee@rcees.ac.cn

Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  Technical support: info@rhhz.net