XU Duanping, CHE Yifu, WU Yao, WANG Yu. Sorption of mercury(Ⅱ) and arsenic(Ⅲ) on humic acid from peatsoil[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(9): 5275-5282. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201609120
Citation: XU Duanping, CHE Yifu, WU Yao, WANG Yu. Sorption of mercury(Ⅱ) and arsenic(Ⅲ) on humic acid from peatsoil[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(9): 5275-5282. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201609120

Sorption of mercury(Ⅱ) and arsenic(Ⅲ) on humic acid from peatsoil

  • Received Date: 03/12/2016
    Accepted Date: 13/09/2016
    Available Online: 26/08/2017
    Fund Project:
  • Humic acid was extracted from peatsoil collected from Zhangwu county Liaoning province. Batch experiments were performed to investigate the sorption of Hg(Ⅱ) and As(Ⅲ) on the humic acid. Effect of temperature (15,25, 35, 45℃), pH (3, 5, 7, 9) and ionic strength (Ca2+, H2PO4-) on the sorption was also researched. Results indicated that sorption capacity of Hg(Ⅱ) and As(Ⅲ) on the humic acid was positively correlated with temperature, while temperature had little effect of As(Ⅲ) sorption on the humic acid.Sorption capacity of Hg(Ⅱ) on the humic acid was positively correlated with solution pH, while pH=7, sorption capacity of As(Ⅲ) on the humic acid reached the highest.Ca2+could reduce the sorption capacity of Hg(Ⅱ) on the humic acid while H2PO4- had few impact on the sorption of As(Ⅲ). Sorption isotherm of Hg(Ⅱ) and As(Ⅲ) on humic acid could be better discribed with Freundlich equation. Experimental data were better fitted with Lagrangian pseudo-second-order sorption kinetics equation. The sorption activation energy of Hg(Ⅱ) on the humic acid was 23.06 kJ·mol-1 and that of As(Ⅲ) was 2.65 kJ·mol-1. It indicated that sorption of Hg(Ⅱ) on the humic acid was controlled by chemical sorption while thjat of As(Ⅲ) on the humic acid was physical absorption mainly.
  • [1] 楼涛,陈国华,谢会祥,等.腐植质与有机污染物作用研究进展[J].海洋环境科学,2004,23(3):71-76

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [2] 斯蒂文森F J.腐殖质化学[M].夏荣基,译.北京:北京农业大学出版社,1994

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [3] 王亚军,朱琨.腐殖酸对六价铬在砂土中吸附行为的影响研究[J].兰州交通大学学报(自然科学版),2005,24(4):67-71

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [4] 杨亚提,张一平.土壤胡敏酸的解离及其与Cu2+的络合特征[J].环境科学学报,2001,21(6):731-736

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [5] 李光林,魏世强,牟树森.土壤胡敏酸对的Pb吸附特征与影响因素[J].农业环境科学学报,2004,23(2):308-312

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [6] 刘保峰,王强,孟威,等.酸度对胡敏酸与镉和锌离子络合反应的影响[J].西南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2005,27(4):451-455

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [7] 朱丽珺,张金池,胡书燕,等.Pb2+、Cu2+、Cd2+在胡敏酸上的吸附和竞争吸附[J].安全与环境学报,2008,8(6):22-26

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [8] CALACE N, DERIU D, PETRONIO B M.Adsorption isotherms and breakthrough curves to study how humic acids influence heavy metal-soil interactions[J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution,2009,204(1):373-383

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [9] 孟凡德,袁国栋,韦婧,等.风化煤提取的胡敏酸对镉的吸附性能及其应用潜力[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2016,42(4):460-468

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [10] 冯新斌,仇广乐,付学吾,等.环境汞污染[J].化学进展,2009,21(Z1):436-457

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [11] 王萍,王世亮,刘少卿,等.砷的发生形态、污染源及地球化学循环[J].环境科学与技术,2010,33(7):90-97

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [12] 文启孝.土壤有机质研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1984

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [13] 周强,段钰锋,冒咏秋,等.活性炭汞吸附动力学及吸附机制研究[J].中国电机工程学报, 2013,33(29):10-17

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [14] 吴云海,谢正威,胡玥,等.茶叶渣吸附水中砷的动力学与热力学研究[J].湖北农业科学,2010,49(4):859-862

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [15] 林玉锁.Langmuir、Temkin和Freundlich方程应用于土壤吸附锌的比较[J].土壤,1994,26(5):269-272

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [16] 何隧源,金云云,何方.环境化学[M].上海:华东理工大学出版社,1996

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [17] 近藤精一.吸附科学[M].李国希,译.北京:化学工业出版社,2005

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [18] 高大元,何碧,何松伟,等.Arrhenius方法的局限性讨论[J].含能材料,2006,14(2):132-135

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [19] AKSU Z.Determination of the equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of the batch biosorption of nickel(Ⅱ) ions onto chlorella vulgaris[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2002,38(1):89-99

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [20] 朱丽珺,张金池,俞元春,等.胡敏酸吸附重金属Cu2+、Pb2+、Cd2+的特征及影响因素[J].农业环境科学学报,2008,27(6):2240-2245

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [21] 李光林,魏世强,青长乐.镉在胡敏酸上的吸附动力学和热力学研究[J].土壤学报,2004,41(1):74-80

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [22] 叶瑛,季珊珊,邬黛黛,等.几种吸附剂吸附亚砷酸根离子过程中pH值的动态变化[J].高校地质学报,2006,12(2):228-233

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [23] 关连珠,周景景,张昀,等.不同来源生物炭对砷在土壤中吸附与解吸的影响[J].应用生态学报,2003,24(10):2941-2946

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [24] WABDRYSZJA R V.Humic acids:Their detergent qualities and potential uses in pollution remediation[J].Geochemical Transactions,2000,1(1):1-6

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [25] 梁咏梅,刘伟,马军.pH和腐殖酸对高铁酸盐去除水中铅、镉的影响[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2003,35(5):543-548

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [26] 余贵芬,青长乐,牟树森,等.汞在腐殖酸上的吸附与解吸特征[J].环境科学学报,2001,21(5):601-606

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [27] PARTHASARATHI C, KRUSHNA V, MARIAME C,et al. Reduction of mercury (Ⅱ) by humic substances:Influence of pH, salinity of aquatic system[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2005,22(14):10529-10538

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [28] BAM S G.Adsorption and stability of arsenic(Ⅲ) at the clay mineral-water interface[J]. Environmental Science and Technology,1997,31(7):2005-2011

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [29] VIOLANTE A, PIGNA M. Competitive sorpiton of arsenate and phosphate on different clay minerals and soils[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2002,66(6):1788-1796

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [30] FAKOUR H, PAN Y F,LIN T F. Effect of humic acid on arsenic adsorption and pore blockage on iron-based adsorbent[J].Water, Air, & Soil Pollution,2015,226(2):1-16

    Google Scholar Pub Med

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(1486) PDF downloads(466) Cited by(0)

Access History

Sorption of mercury(Ⅱ) and arsenic(Ⅲ) on humic acid from peatsoil

Fund Project:

Abstract: Humic acid was extracted from peatsoil collected from Zhangwu county Liaoning province. Batch experiments were performed to investigate the sorption of Hg(Ⅱ) and As(Ⅲ) on the humic acid. Effect of temperature (15,25, 35, 45℃), pH (3, 5, 7, 9) and ionic strength (Ca2+, H2PO4-) on the sorption was also researched. Results indicated that sorption capacity of Hg(Ⅱ) and As(Ⅲ) on the humic acid was positively correlated with temperature, while temperature had little effect of As(Ⅲ) sorption on the humic acid.Sorption capacity of Hg(Ⅱ) on the humic acid was positively correlated with solution pH, while pH=7, sorption capacity of As(Ⅲ) on the humic acid reached the highest.Ca2+could reduce the sorption capacity of Hg(Ⅱ) on the humic acid while H2PO4- had few impact on the sorption of As(Ⅲ). Sorption isotherm of Hg(Ⅱ) and As(Ⅲ) on humic acid could be better discribed with Freundlich equation. Experimental data were better fitted with Lagrangian pseudo-second-order sorption kinetics equation. The sorption activation energy of Hg(Ⅱ) on the humic acid was 23.06 kJ·mol-1 and that of As(Ⅲ) was 2.65 kJ·mol-1. It indicated that sorption of Hg(Ⅱ) on the humic acid was controlled by chemical sorption while thjat of As(Ⅲ) on the humic acid was physical absorption mainly.

Reference (30)

Catalog

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint