2016—2018年《环境工程学报》高下载量论文、高被引论文、高发文作者和高发文机构分析
- 1. 中国科学院生态环境研究中心文献信息中心，北京 100085
- 2. 中国科学院生态环境研究中心《环境工程学报》编辑部，北京 100085
基金项目:
摘要: 检索了2016—2018年《环境工程学报》刊发论文的被引频次、下载量、作者、机构等指标数据，定义并统计了高下载量论文、高被引论文、高发文作者和高发文机构，以期为选题策划、约稿和组稿提供参考。使用限定次数法并依据普莱斯定律对《环境工程学报》高下载量论文、高被引论文、高发文作者和高发文机构进行界定；采用文献计量学方法，分析发文量、被引次数、下载次数、栏目、机构等相关数据。通过对181篇高下载量论文、245篇高被引论文、86名高发文作者、54家高发文机构分析发现：尽管水污染防治栏目的高下载量和高被引论文绝对数量最多，但该栏目高下载论文和高被引论文占本栏目全部发表文章的比例却不高；综述类文章中的高下载和高被引论文绝对数量虽然不高，但其占本栏目发文总量的比例却最高，即综述类文章的受关注度远高于一般研究论文；《环境工程学报》高发文作者和高发文机构对该刊发文总量的贡献率较大。
Analysis of highly downloaded papers, highly cited papers, highly published authors, highly published institutions in Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering from 2016 to 2018
- 1. Documentation and Information Center, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
- 2. Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
Fund Project:
Abstract: To provides insights into topic selection and manuscripts solicitation, data of the cited frequency, the downloading capacity, authors and institutions of published papers in Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering(CJEE) from 2016 to 2018 were searched, and the highly downloaded papers, highly cited papers, highly published authors, highly published institutions were defined and counted. The limited number method was used to define the highly downloaded papers, highly cited papers. And the highly published authors, highly published institutions were defined according to Price law. The bibliometric method was used to analyze the data of paper numbers, cited frequency, downloading capacity, columns, institutions. Based on the analysis of 181 highly downloaded papers, 245 highly cited papers, 86 highly published authors and 54 highly published institutions, the largest absolute number of highly downloaded and cited papers in the column of water pollution prevention and control occurred among CJEE columns, but their proportion in the total number of published papers in this column was low. On the contrary, the absolute number of highly downloaded and cited papers in review column was low, but their proportion in the total number of published papers was the highest among CJEE columns. This indicates that review papers could receive much more attention than general research papers. The highly published authors and institutions made more contributions to the total number of published papers in CJEE than others.
点击查看大图
下载:
