高级搜索

响应曲面法中BBD和CCD在优化巯基乙酰化壳聚糖制备条件中的比较

,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

王刚, 王馨, 宋小三, 郑小娟. 响应曲面法中BBD和CCD在优化巯基乙酰化壳聚糖制备条件中的比较[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(9): 2502-2511. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801208
引用本文: 王刚, 王馨, 宋小三, 郑小娟. 响应曲面法中BBD和CCD在优化巯基乙酰化壳聚糖制备条件中的比较[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(9): 2502-2511. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801208
shu
WANG Gang, WANG Xin, SONG Xiaosan, ZHENG Xiaojuan. Comparison between BBD and CCD in response surface methodology to optimize preparation conditions of mercaptoacetyl chitosan[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(9): 2502-2511. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801208
Citation: WANG Gang, WANG Xin, SONG Xiaosan, ZHENG Xiaojuan. Comparison between BBD and CCD in response surface methodology to optimize preparation conditions of mercaptoacetyl chitosan[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(9): 2502-2511. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801208
shu

响应曲面法中BBD和CCD在优化巯基乙酰化壳聚糖制备条件中的比较

  • 1.

    兰州交通大学环境与市政工程学院，兰州 730070

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目（51368030）

Comparison between BBD and CCD in response surface methodology to optimize preparation conditions of mercaptoacetyl chitosan

  • 1.

    School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 以壳聚糖(CTS)和巯基乙酸为主要原料，通过酰胺化反应将巯基引入到CTS高分子链上，制备出高分子重金属絮凝剂巯基乙酰化壳聚糖（MACTS）。以含Cd(II)水样为考察目标，采用响应曲面法中的BBD和CCD实验对MACTS的制备条件进行优化，从残差分析、方差分析、响应面分析和优化条件等方面对BBD法和CCD法进行比较。结果表明，BBD法和CCD法建立的二次多项式模型回归性分别为显著和非常显著，模型选择均合理；BBD法和CCD法拟合模型的决定系数R2分别为0.871 0、0.919 7,模型相关性均较好；通过BBD法和CCD法优化制备条件后的MACTS处理含Cd(II)水样，Cd(II)的最低剩余浓度分别为0.83、0.76 mg·L-1。在优化MACTS的制备条件上采用CCD法更优于BBD法。
    Abstract: A novel macromolecule heavy metal flocculant, named mercaptoacetyl chitosan (MACTS), was prepared with chitosan (CTS) and mercaptoacetic acid as raw materials by amidation reaction. The water samples containing Cd(II) were investigated to determine the optimal preparation conditions of MACTS through Box-Behnken design (BBD) and central composite design (CCD) of response surface methodology (RSM), and the comparison between BBD and CCD was also discussed in residual analysis, variance analysis, response surface analysis and the optimal conditions of MACTS. The results showed that the regression of the quadratic polynomial model established through BBD and CCD was significant and very significant, respectively, which demonstrated these models were reasonable. The determination coefficient (R2) of the models by using BBD and CCD was 0.871 0 and 0.919 7, respectively, which indicated the models had good agreements with experimental data. Under the preparation conditions of MACTS optimized by BBD and CCD, the residual concentration of Cd(II) in the water samples was 0.83 and 0.76 mg·L-1, respectively. CCD was better than BBD to optimize the preparation conditions of MACTS.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 邹照华，何素芳，韩彩芸，等. 重金属废水处理技术研究进展[J]. 水处理技术,2010,36(6):17-21
    [2] WANG G, CHANG Q, HAN X T,et al.Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution by flocculant with the capacity of reduction and chelation[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2013,248-249:115-121 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.01.001
    [3] 刘立华，刘星，李艳红，等. 两性高分子重金属螯合絮凝剂的合成及其对Cu(Ⅱ)的去除性能[J]. 环境工程学报,2015,9(3):1049-1056
    [4] 常青. 絮凝学研究的新领域：具有重金属捕集功能的高分子絮凝剂[J]. 环境科学学报,2015,35(1):1-11
    [5] 张毅，张转玲，黎淑婷，等. 壳聚糖对重金属离子的吸附性能[J]. 天津工业大学学报,2016,35(3):16-20
    [6] LEMRABET E, JAAFARI K, BENKHOUJA K,et al.Removal of heavy-metal ion by adsorption on chitosan gel beads[J].Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials,2013,15(11/12):1298-1302
    [7] TAN T W, HE X J, DU W X.Adsorption behaviour of metal ions on imprinted chitosan resin[J].Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology,2001,76(2):191-195 10.1002/jctb.358
    [8] YONG S K, BOLAN N, LOMBI E,et al.Synthesis and characterization of thiolated chitosan beads for removal of Cu(Ⅱ) and Cd(Ⅱ) from wastewater[J].Water, Air and Soil Pollution,2013,224(12):255-266 10.1007/s11270-013-1720-0
    [9] 张翠玲，常青. 巯基化条件对巯基乙酰壳聚糖除镉性能的影响[J]. 环境工程学报,2010,4(11):2446-2448
    [10] WITEK-KROWIAK A, CHOJNACKA K, PODSTAWCZYK D,et al.Application of response surface methodology and artificial neural network methods in modelling and optimization of biosorption process[J].Bioresource Technology,2014,160:150-160 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.021
    [11] KHATAEE A R, KASIRI M B, ALIDOKHT L.Application of response surface methodology in the optimization of photocatalytic removal of environmental pollutants using nanocatalysts[J].Environmental Technology,2011,32(15):1669-1684 10.1080/09593330.2011.597432
    [12] 马俊伟，刘杰伟，刘彦忠，等. 微生物絮凝剂M-C11处理高岭土悬浊液的响应曲面优化[J]. 环境工程学报,2015,9(2):677-682
    [13] 郝海艳，王刚，徐敏，等. 响应面法优化制备螯合絮凝剂巯基乙酰化聚丙烯酰胺[J]. 环境化学,2016,35(6):1269-1279
    [14] 沈王庆，李小雪，黄佳. 改性柠檬渣的结构特征及其对Cu2+的吸附性能[J]. 环境科学研究,2016,29(1):146-154
    [15] XU M Y, YIN P, LIU X G,et al.Optimization of biosorption parameters of Hg(II) from aqueous solutions by the buckwheat hulls using respond surface methodology[J].Desalination and Water Treatment,2013,51:4546-4555 10.1080/19443994.2013.770591
    [16] TRINH T K, KANG L S.Application of response surface method as an experimental design to optimize coagulation tests[J].Environmental Engineering Research,2010,15(2):63-70 10.4491/eer.2010.15.2.063
    [17] 张翠玲，常青，黄丹. 巯基乙酰壳聚糖制备条件的优化及其絮凝性能[J]. 工业水处理,2010,30(8):40-42
    [18] 陈锐，黄进，叶萌，等. 巯基壳聚糖的合成、表征及其对Cu2+的吸附行为[J]. 应用化工,2011,40(7):1125-1130
    [19] 郑怀礼，焦世珺，邓晓莉，等. 响应面法优化聚磷硫酸铁的制备及其应用[J]. 环境工程学报,2012,6(1):9-14
    [20] 杜凤龄，王刚，徐敏，等. 新型高分子螯合-絮凝剂制备条件的响应面法优化[J]. 中国环境科学,2015,35(4):1116-1122
    [21] K?RBAHTI B K, RAUF M A.Response surface methodology (RSM) analysis of photoinduced decoloration of toludine blue[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2008,136:25-30 10.1016/j.cej.2007.03.007
    [22] 王利平，李祥梅，沈肖龙，等. 响应面方法优化Fenton试剂处理甲萘酚废水[J]. 环境工程学报,2015,9(4):1797-1802
    [23] 李华楠，徐冰冰，齐飞，等. 响应面法优化赤泥负载Co催化剂制备及活性评价[J]. 环境科学,2013,34(11):4376-4385
    [24] 张晟，陈玉成. 环境试验优化设计与数据分析[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2008:62-63
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7416
  • HTML全文浏览数:  7239
  • PDF下载数:  399
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 刊出日期:  2018-09-20
王刚, 王馨, 宋小三, 郑小娟. 响应曲面法中BBD和CCD在优化巯基乙酰化壳聚糖制备条件中的比较[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(9): 2502-2511. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801208
引用本文: 王刚, 王馨, 宋小三, 郑小娟. 响应曲面法中BBD和CCD在优化巯基乙酰化壳聚糖制备条件中的比较[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(9): 2502-2511. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801208
shu
WANG Gang, WANG Xin, SONG Xiaosan, ZHENG Xiaojuan. Comparison between BBD and CCD in response surface methodology to optimize preparation conditions of mercaptoacetyl chitosan[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(9): 2502-2511. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801208
Citation: WANG Gang, WANG Xin, SONG Xiaosan, ZHENG Xiaojuan. Comparison between BBD and CCD in response surface methodology to optimize preparation conditions of mercaptoacetyl chitosan[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(9): 2502-2511. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801208
shu

响应曲面法中BBD和CCD在优化巯基乙酰化壳聚糖制备条件中的比较

  • 1. 兰州交通大学环境与市政工程学院，兰州 730070
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（51368030）

摘要: 以壳聚糖(CTS)和巯基乙酸为主要原料，通过酰胺化反应将巯基引入到CTS高分子链上，制备出高分子重金属絮凝剂巯基乙酰化壳聚糖（MACTS）。以含Cd(II)水样为考察目标，采用响应曲面法中的BBD和CCD实验对MACTS的制备条件进行优化，从残差分析、方差分析、响应面分析和优化条件等方面对BBD法和CCD法进行比较。结果表明，BBD法和CCD法建立的二次多项式模型回归性分别为显著和非常显著，模型选择均合理；BBD法和CCD法拟合模型的决定系数R2分别为0.871 0、0.919 7,模型相关性均较好；通过BBD法和CCD法优化制备条件后的MACTS处理含Cd(II)水样，Cd(II)的最低剩余浓度分别为0.83、0.76 mg·L-1。在优化MACTS的制备条件上采用CCD法更优于BBD法。

English Abstract

参考文献 (24)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心