高级搜索

超滤膜与后置砂滤池净水效果对比

,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

徐姮, 陆少鸣, 夏莉, 张菊萍. 超滤膜与后置砂滤池净水效果对比[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(10): 5485-5490. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505078
引用本文: 徐姮, 陆少鸣, 夏莉, 张菊萍. 超滤膜与后置砂滤池净水效果对比[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(10): 5485-5490. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505078
shu
XU Heng, LU Shaoming, XIA Li, ZHANG Juping. Water purifying efficiency comparing of ultrafiltration membrane and rear-set sand filter[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(10): 5485-5490. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505078
Citation: XU Heng, LU Shaoming, XIA Li, ZHANG Juping. Water purifying efficiency comparing of ultrafiltration membrane and rear-set sand filter[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(10): 5485-5490. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505078
shu

超滤膜与后置砂滤池净水效果对比

  • 1.

    华南理工大学环境与能源学院, 广州 510006

  • 2.

    中国市政工程华北设计研究总院, 广州 511400

  • 基金项目:

    国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0400705）

  • 中图分类号: X703

Water purifying efficiency comparing of ultrafiltration membrane and rear-set sand filter

  • 1.

    College of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China

  • 2.

    North China Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute, Guangzhou 511400, China

  • Fund Project:

摘要

  • 摘要: 将“混凝沉淀-前置砂滤池-升流式生物活性炭滤池”工艺出水分别进入后砂滤池与超滤膜组件，比较两者对水中的浊度、CODMn、氨氮、颗粒数及微型生物的去除效果。结果表明：超滤膜平均去浊率为31.57%，去浊优势不是很明显，但明显高于后砂滤池去浊率；对于CODMn的去除，后砂滤池的平均去除率为6.80%，优于超滤膜；后砂滤池对氨氮的去除率达到50.08%，相比超滤膜优势很明显；超滤膜出水颗粒数相对较平稳，且能有效保证饮用水生物安全性。后砂滤池的微絮凝作用，可使其出水浊度、CODMn及微型生物数量均有所降低，但其对微型生物的去除效果与超滤膜相比仍有不足。
    Abstract: The effluent from a coagulation sand-filter upflow biological activated carbon filter process was treated by a rear-set sand filter and an ultrafiltration (UF) membrane module.This paper compares the removal effect of the two techniques on turbidity,CODMn,ammonia nitrogen,particle numbers,and microorganisms.Experimental results showed that the average removal rate of turbidity by UF was 31.57%,which is not a high proportion,but it was significantly higher than that by the rear-set sand filter.For the removal of CODMn,the average removal rate by the sand filter was 6.80% higher than that by UF.The removal rate of ammonia nitrogen by the sand filter was 50.08%,which was higher than that by UF.The particles of the effluent from the UF membrane were relatively stable,therefore UF effectively ensured the biological safety of drinking water.The microflocculation of the rear-set sand filter decreased the turbidity,CODMn,and microbial quantities,but when compared with the UF membrane,the removal effect of microorganisms was still insufficient.
  • [1] DELCHER C.,WAGENAAR A.C.,GOLDBERGER B.A.,et al.Abrupt decline in oxycodone-caused mortality after implementation of Florida's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program.Drug and Alcohol Dependence,2015,150:63-68
    [2] 张兵.我国城市给水工程的状况和问题.山西建筑,2001,27(5):127-128ZHANG Bing.The present state of city water-supply and it's problems in our country.Shanxi Architecture,2001,27(5):127-128(in Chinese)
    [3] 王晓云,付爱民,张启良.双膜深度处理技术在台湾某净水厂的应用.中国给水排水,2009,25(14):52-55WANG Xiaoyun,FU Aimin,ZHANG Qiliang.Application of UF/LPRO advanced treatment technology in waterworks in Taiwan.China Water & Wastewater,2009,25(14):52-55(in Chinese)
    [4] 高东辉,曲敬波,苏伟义.超滤膜技术在饮用水处理中的应用和研究进展.北方环境,2013,25(10):71-78GAO Donghui,QU Jingbo,SU Weiyi.Application and study progress of UF in drinking water treatment.Northern Environment,2013,25(10):71-78(in Chinese)
    [5] 国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法.4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002
    [6] 杨艳玲,李星,丛丽,等.优化监测与净水工艺提高致病原生动物去除率.给水排水,2003,29(6):22-26YANG Yanling,LI Xing,CONG Li,et al.Optimizing of water quality monitoring and removal of pathogenic protozoa in waterworks.Water & Wastewater Engineering,2003,29(6):22-26(in Chinese)
    [7] ROSE J.B.Occurrence and significance of cryptosporidium in water.Journal AWWA,1998,80(2):53-58
    [8] DUGAN N.R.,FOX K.R.,OWENS J.H.,et al.Controlling "cryptosporidium" oocysts using conventional treatment.Journal AWWA,2001,93(12):64-76
    [9] 罗晓鸿,曹莉莉,王占生.不同分子量的有机物在净水工艺中的去除研究.中国环境科学,1998,18(4):341-344LUO Xiaohong,CAO Lili,WANG Zhansheng.Study on the removal of different molecular-weight organics by water purification process.China Environmental Science,1998,18(4):341-344(in Chinese)
    [10] 陈卫,李敏,林涛.饮用水处理中有机物分子量分布规律研究.解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版),2009,10(2):160-164 CHEN Wei,LI Min,LIN Tao.Molecular weight distribution of organics during drinking water treatment.Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition),2009,10(2):160-164(in Chinese)
    [11] 何元春,许超伟.颗粒物计数仪在生物活性炭工艺中的应用.中国给水排水,2004,20(4):71-73 HE Yuanchun,XU Chaowei.Application of particle counter in biological activated carbon process.China Water & Wastewater,2004,20(4):71-73(in Chinese)
    [12] 邵志昌,陆少鸣,廖伟,等.针对O3-BAC工艺生物泄露问题后置砂滤池级配研究.水处理技术,2012,38(3):111-113 SHAO Zhichang,LU Shaoming,LIAO Wei,et al.Study on the grading of rear-set sand filtration for the problem of micro organism leak in O3-BAC process.Technology of Water Treatment,2012,38(3):111-113(in Chinese)
    [13] 查人光,徐兵.低浊度控制与饮用水安全浅议.给水排水,2005,31(1):11-14 ZHA Renguang,XU Bing.Discussion on drinking water safety and low turbidity control.Water & Wastewater Engineering,2005,31(1):11-14(in Chinese)
    [14] 刘丽君,张金松,安娜,等.生物活性炭滤池中无脊椎动物孳生问题与对策.给水排水,2009,35(3):14-18 LIU Lijun,ZHANG Jinsong,AN Na,et al.Problems and solutions of the invertebrates breeding in biological activated carbon filter.Water & Wastewater Engineering,2009,35(3):14-18(in Chinese)
    [15] 赵英,于丹丹,秦东平,等.PAC投加量对MBR混合液性质及膜污染的影响.水处理技术,2005,31(11):52-55 ZHAO Ying,YU Dandan,QIN Dongping,et al.Effect of powdered activated carbon dosage on mixed liquor characteristics and membrane fouling in MBR.Technology of Water Treatment,2005,31(11):52-55(in Chinese)
    [16] LIPP P.,BALDAUF G.,SCHICK R.,et al.Stabel integration of ultrafiltration to conventional drinking water treatment for a better particle removal-efficiency and costs.Desalination,1998,119(1/2/3):133-142
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2194
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1688
  • PDF下载数:  503
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-06-13
  • 刊出日期:  2016-10-20
徐姮, 陆少鸣, 夏莉, 张菊萍. 超滤膜与后置砂滤池净水效果对比[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(10): 5485-5490. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505078
引用本文: 徐姮, 陆少鸣, 夏莉, 张菊萍. 超滤膜与后置砂滤池净水效果对比[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(10): 5485-5490. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505078
shu
XU Heng, LU Shaoming, XIA Li, ZHANG Juping. Water purifying efficiency comparing of ultrafiltration membrane and rear-set sand filter[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(10): 5485-5490. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505078
Citation: XU Heng, LU Shaoming, XIA Li, ZHANG Juping. Water purifying efficiency comparing of ultrafiltration membrane and rear-set sand filter[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(10): 5485-5490. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505078
shu

超滤膜与后置砂滤池净水效果对比

  • 1. 华南理工大学环境与能源学院, 广州 510006
  • 2. 中国市政工程华北设计研究总院, 广州 511400
  • 收稿日期:  2015-06-13
基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0400705）

摘要: 将“混凝沉淀-前置砂滤池-升流式生物活性炭滤池”工艺出水分别进入后砂滤池与超滤膜组件，比较两者对水中的浊度、CODMn、氨氮、颗粒数及微型生物的去除效果。结果表明：超滤膜平均去浊率为31.57%，去浊优势不是很明显，但明显高于后砂滤池去浊率；对于CODMn的去除，后砂滤池的平均去除率为6.80%，优于超滤膜；后砂滤池对氨氮的去除率达到50.08%，相比超滤膜优势很明显；超滤膜出水颗粒数相对较平稳，且能有效保证饮用水生物安全性。后砂滤池的微絮凝作用，可使其出水浊度、CODMn及微型生物数量均有所降低，但其对微型生物的去除效果与超滤膜相比仍有不足。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (16)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心