新型化粪池处理生活污水启动阶段的实验

陈志强, 关华滨. 新型化粪池处理生活污水启动阶段的实验[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(4): 1267-1272.
引用本文: 陈志强, 关华滨. 新型化粪池处理生活污水启动阶段的实验[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(4): 1267-1272.
Chen Zhiqiang, Guan Huabin. Experiment on start-up phase of new modified septic tanks treating domestic sewage[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(4): 1267-1272.
Citation: Chen Zhiqiang, Guan Huabin. Experiment on start-up phase of new modified septic tanks treating domestic sewage[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(4): 1267-1272.

新型化粪池处理生活污水启动阶段的实验

  • 基金项目:

    国家水专项项目(2009ZX07317-008-01,2012ZX07201003)

  • 中图分类号: X703.1

Experiment on start-up phase of new modified septic tanks treating domestic sewage

  • Fund Project:
  • 摘要: 在常温的条件下,用厌氧折流板反应器(ABR)化粪池、YDT填料化粪池和传统三格式化粪池处理生活污水,进行了对照实验研究。实验结果表明,在温度为14~29℃,HRT为36 h时, 反应器运行85 d后,对以上3个反应器进出水中CODtot、CODdis、氨氮、总氮、总磷进行测定,在水温24℃稳定阶段,ABR化粪池和YDT填料化粪池CODtot去除率比传统化粪池分别提高30.5%和9.2%;在水温16℃稳定阶段时,该值分别提高10.9%和9.0%。总氮和氨氮去除率在5%~30%之间,稳定运行后总磷去除率为5%左右。通过测定3个反应器最后一格中厌氧污泥的比产甲烷速率,结果表明,ABR化粪池的厌氧污泥产甲烷的活性最好。此研究对传统化粪池的改造提出经济而行之有效办法,新型化粪池强化了化粪池出水的生化性和对污染物的去除,进而为化粪池的取舍和改造提供技术的参考依据。
  • [1] Butler D., Payne E. Septic tanks: Problems and practice. Building and Environment, 1995,30(3):419-425
    [2] Mbuligwe Se. Applicability of a septic tank/engineered wetland system in the treatment and recycling of wastewater from a small community. Management, 2005,35(1):99-108
    [3] 王红燕, 李杰, 王亚娥,等. 化粪池污水处理能力研究及其评价. 兰州交通大学学报, 2009,28(1):118-120 Wang H.Y., Li J., Wang Y. E., et al. Research and evaluation on processing capacity of wastewater by septic tank. Journal of Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2009,28(1):118-120(in Chinese)
    [4] Lettinga G., Van Knippenberg K., Veenstra S., et al. Final report "upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) low-cost sanitation project in Bandung, Indonesia". IHE, Delft Agricultural University, Wageningen, St. Borromeus Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia, 1991
    [5] Mgana S.M. Towards sustainable and robust on-site domestic wastewater treatment for all citizens. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2003
    [6] 曹辉. 建议在城市污水处理系统完善的情况下取消化粪池. 广东建材, 2010,(5):163-164 Cao H. Advice on cancel of septic tank in the condition of perfect sewage treatment systems. Building Materials in Guangdong, 2010,(5):163-164(in Chinese)
    [7] 张凯松,周启星,孙铁珩.城镇生活污水处理技术研究进展.世界科技研究与发展,2003,25(5):5-10 Zhang K.S., Zhou Q.X., Sun T.H. Progress on technology of urban sewage treatment. World Sci-Tech. Research and Development, 2003,25(5):5-10(in Chinese)
    [8] Lettinga G. Sustainable integrated biological wastewater treatment.Water Science and Technology, 1996,33(3):85-98
    [9] Hammes F., Kalogo Y., Verstraete W. Anaerobic digestion technologies for closing the domestic water, carbon and nutrient cycles. Water Science and Technology, 2000,41(3):203-211
    [10] Zeeman G., Lettinga G. The role of anaerobic digestion of domestic sewage in closing the water and nutrient cycle at community level. Water Science and Technology, 1999,39(5):187-194
    [11] 任南琪, 王爱杰,等. 厌氧生物技术原理与应用. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2004
    [12] 国家环境保护局. 水与废水监测分析方法(第4版). 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002
    [13] Luostarinen S., Rintala J. Anaerobic on-site treatment of black water and dairy parlour wastewater in UASB-septic tanks at low temperatures. Water Research, 2005,39(2-3):436-448
    [14] Luostarinen S., Luste S., Valentin L., et al. Nitrogen removal from on-site treated anaerobic effluents using intermittently aerated moving bed biofilm reactors at low temperatures. Water Research, 2006,40(3):1607-1615
    [15] R. E. 斯皮思,著, 李亚新,译. 工业废水的厌氧生物技术. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001
    [16] 汪彩华, 郑平, 余焱,等. 有效碱度对螺旋式自循环厌氧反应器性能的影响. 化学反应工程与工艺, 2009,25(4):339-344 Wang C. H., Zheng P., Yu Y., et al. Effect on spiral circulation anaerobic reactor due to different effective alkalinity. Chemical Reaction Engineering and Technology, 2009,25(4):339-344(in Chinese)
    [17] Bogte J. J., Breure A. M., van Andel J. G., et al. Anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewaters in small scale UASB reactors. Water Science and Technology, 1993,27(9):75-82
    [18] Lettinga G., De Man A., Van der Last, et al. Anaerobictreatment of domestic sewage and wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 1993,27(9):63-73
    [19] Luostarinen S., Luste S., Valentin L., et al. Nitrogen removal from on-site treated anaerobic effluents using intermittently aerated moving bed biofilm reactors at low temperatures. Water Research, 2006,40(3):1607-1615
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2163
  • HTML全文浏览数:  961
  • PDF下载数:  1080
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-03-28
  • 刊出日期:  2013-04-09
陈志强, 关华滨. 新型化粪池处理生活污水启动阶段的实验[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(4): 1267-1272.
引用本文: 陈志强, 关华滨. 新型化粪池处理生活污水启动阶段的实验[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(4): 1267-1272.
Chen Zhiqiang, Guan Huabin. Experiment on start-up phase of new modified septic tanks treating domestic sewage[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(4): 1267-1272.
Citation: Chen Zhiqiang, Guan Huabin. Experiment on start-up phase of new modified septic tanks treating domestic sewage[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(4): 1267-1272.

新型化粪池处理生活污水启动阶段的实验

  • 1. 哈尔滨工业大学城市水资源与水环境国家重点实验室,哈尔滨 150090
基金项目:

国家水专项项目(2009ZX07317-008-01,2012ZX07201003)

摘要: 在常温的条件下,用厌氧折流板反应器(ABR)化粪池、YDT填料化粪池和传统三格式化粪池处理生活污水,进行了对照实验研究。实验结果表明,在温度为14~29℃,HRT为36 h时, 反应器运行85 d后,对以上3个反应器进出水中CODtot、CODdis、氨氮、总氮、总磷进行测定,在水温24℃稳定阶段,ABR化粪池和YDT填料化粪池CODtot去除率比传统化粪池分别提高30.5%和9.2%;在水温16℃稳定阶段时,该值分别提高10.9%和9.0%。总氮和氨氮去除率在5%~30%之间,稳定运行后总磷去除率为5%左右。通过测定3个反应器最后一格中厌氧污泥的比产甲烷速率,结果表明,ABR化粪池的厌氧污泥产甲烷的活性最好。此研究对传统化粪池的改造提出经济而行之有效办法,新型化粪池强化了化粪池出水的生化性和对污染物的去除,进而为化粪池的取舍和改造提供技术的参考依据。

English Abstract

参考文献 (19)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回