ABR反应器的两种快速启动方法对比

林英姿; 王爽; 于炳慧; 曹长虎

环境工程学报

ABR反应器的两种快速启动方法对比

, , ,

林英姿, 王爽, 于炳慧, 曹长虎. ABR反应器的两种快速启动方法对比[J]. 环境工程学报, 2009, 3(4): 669-672.

引用本文:

林英姿, 王爽, 于炳慧, 曹长虎. ABR反应器的两种快速启动方法对比[J]. 环境工程学报, 2009, 3(4): 669-672.

Lin Yingzi, Wang Shuang, Yu Binghui, Cao Changhu. Comparison of two methods on ABR reactor quick start[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2009, 3(4): 669-672.

Citation:

Lin Yingzi, Wang Shuang, Yu Binghui, Cao Changhu. Comparison of two methods on ABR reactor quick start[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2009, 3(4): 669-672.

ABR反应器的两种快速启动方法对比

1.
吉林建筑工程学院水污染控制与资源化利用吉林省重点实验室，长春 130021
基金项目:
吉林省教育厅资助项目（200696）
中图分类号: X703

Comparison of two methods on ABR reactor quick start

1.
Jilin Province Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Resources Reuse,Jilin Architectural and Civil Engineering Institute, Changchun 130021
Fund Project:

摘要: ABR反应器的启动是ABR反应器能否高效稳定运行的关键，其影响因素很多。为了更好地实现ABR反应器的启动，提出了通过2种不同启动方法的对比，即1#反应器采用好氧预挂膜的方法，2#反应器采用低负荷启动法，得出的结论为，好氧预挂膜启动法的启动时间短，COD去除率高，出水pH稳定，颗粒状污泥生长情况较好，是一种可推广的启动方法。
- ABR反应器 /
- 快速启动 /
- 低负荷启动法 /
- 好氧预挂膜启动法
Abstract: The key of ABR reactor start-up is whether operation efficient and stable or not. In order to achieve better startup of the ABR reactor,a comparison between two different methods was made, 1# reactor used the aerobic reactor linked to prefilm method, 2# reactor used the lowload start. The conclusion is that aerobic prelaunch of film pegged to the start-up time is shorter, its efficiency of COD removal is high, the pH of effluent quality is stable, the growth of granular sludge is good.
- ABR reactor /
- quick starting /
- low-load start law /
- aerobic linked to pre-launch of film

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 1745
HTML全文浏览数: 957
PDF下载数: 898
施引文献: 0

林英姿, 王爽, 于炳慧, 曹长虎. ABR反应器的两种快速启动方法对比[J]. 环境工程学报, 2009, 3(4): 669-672.

引用本文:

林英姿, 王爽, 于炳慧, 曹长虎. ABR反应器的两种快速启动方法对比[J]. 环境工程学报, 2009, 3(4): 669-672.

Lin Yingzi, Wang Shuang, Yu Binghui, Cao Changhu. Comparison of two methods on ABR reactor quick start[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2009, 3(4): 669-672.

Citation:

Lin Yingzi, Wang Shuang, Yu Binghui, Cao Changhu. Comparison of two methods on ABR reactor quick start[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2009, 3(4): 669-672.

ABR反应器的两种快速启动方法对比

1. 吉林建筑工程学院水污染控制与资源化利用吉林省重点实验室，长春 130021

收稿日期: 2008-08-14

基金项目:

吉林省教育厅资助项目（200696）

关键词:

摘要: ABR反应器的启动是ABR反应器能否高效稳定运行的关键，其影响因素很多。为了更好地实现ABR反应器的启动，提出了通过2种不同启动方法的对比，即1#反应器采用好氧预挂膜的方法，2#反应器采用低负荷启动法，得出的结论为，好氧预挂膜启动法的启动时间短，COD去除率高，出水pH稳定，颗粒状污泥生长情况较好，是一种可推广的启动方法。

English Abstract

Comparison of two methods on ABR reactor quick start

1. Jilin Province Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Resources Reuse,Jilin Architectural and Civil Engineering Institute, Changchun 130021

Received Date: 2008-08-14

Fund Project:

Keywords:

Abstract: The key of ABR reactor start-up is whether operation efficient and stable or not. In order to achieve better startup of the ABR reactor,a comparison between two different methods was made, 1# reactor used the aerobic reactor linked to prefilm method, 2# reactor used the lowload start. The conclusion is that aerobic prelaunch of film pegged to the start-up time is shorter, its efficiency of COD removal is high, the pH of effluent quality is stable, the growth of granular sludge is good.

全文HTML

参考文献 (0)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

返回文章

用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

ABR反应器的两种快速启动方法对比

Comparison of two methods on ABR reactor quick start

计量

出版历程

ABR反应器的两种快速启动方法对比

English Abstract

Comparison of two methods on ABR reactor quick start

全文HTML

目录