Guo Li, Cui Jie, Chen Dong, Du Dongyun. A comparative study on treatment of impure acid with low-concentration arsenic[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(3): 1005-1009.
Citation: Guo Li, Cui Jie, Chen Dong, Du Dongyun. A comparative study on treatment of impure acid with low-concentration arsenic[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(3): 1005-1009.

A comparative study on treatment of impure acid with low-concentration arsenic

  • Received Date: 30/10/2012
    Accepted Date: 13/09/2012
    Available Online: 18/03/2013
    Fund Project:
  • The arsenic removal efficiency from low concentration acid wastewater was evaluated by lime neutralization and the combination of lime with ferric iron in the present study. It was found that the level of arsenic, copper, lead and zinc could satisfy the limits specified by the hazardous waste discharge standard (GB 5085.3-2007) leached out of the arsenic-containing solid waste from the combination of lime with ferric iron treatment process. Therefore, the combined utilization was the preferred process because of its higher efficiency and innocuous compared with single lime neutralization. The corresponding parameters were also evaluated to achieve the optimized arsenic removal efficiency. The results indicated that the acid solutions were neutralized with lime in two hours to a final pH value of 2 in the first stage; the second-stage involved with Ca(ClO)2 oxidation with a Ca(ClO)2/As molar ratio of 6, ferric flocculation with a Fe/As molar ratio of 8, and lime neutralization to a final pH of 8 within an hour. After the two stages, the residual concentration of arsenic could below the tolerance level (0.3 mg/L) without any hazardous precipitates. The orthogonal design showed that the significance of the contribution of the above four factors to arsenic removal is ranked as: final pH of reacted solution > reaction time > Fe/As mole ratio > content of oxidant.
  • [1] Mohan D., Pittman Jr. C. U. Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents:A critical review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 142(1-2): 1-53

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [2] 易求实. 三段石灰-铁盐法处理高砷污酸. 硫酸工业, 2012,54(1):46-48 Yi Qiushi. Three-stage lime-ferric salt process for treating high-arsenic waste acid. Sulphuric Acid Industry, 2012,54(1):46-48 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [3] 肖细元, 陈同斌, 廖晓勇,等. 中国主要含砷矿产资源的区域分布与砷污染问题. 地理研究, 2008,27(1):201-212 Xiao Xiyuan, Chen Tongbin, Liao Xiaoyong, et al. Regional distribution arsenic contained minerals and arsenic pollution in China. Geographical Research, 2008,27(1):201-212 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [4] 黄自力,刘缘缘,陶青英,等.石灰沉淀法除砷的影响因素.环境工程学报, 2012,6(3):734-738 Huang Zili, Liu Yuanyuan, Tao Qingying, et al. Influencing factors of arsenic removal by lime precipitation. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012,6(3):734-738 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [5] Harris B. The removal of arsenic from process solutions: theory and industrial practice. Hydrometallurgy 2003: Proceeding of the International Symposium Honoring Professor Ian M. Ritchie. TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2003. 1889-1902

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [6] Langmuir D., Mahoney J., MacDonald A., et al. Predicting arsenic concentrations in the porewaters of buried uranium mill tailings. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1999, 63(19-20):3379-3394

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [7] Twidwell L. G., Robins R. G., Hohn J.W. The removal of arsenic from aqueous solution by coprecipitation with iron (III). In: Reddy, R. G., Ramachandran, V. (Eds.), Arsenic Metallurgy: Fundamentals and Applications, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2005.3-24

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [8] 吴兆清, 陈燎原, 许国强, 等. 石灰-铁盐法处理硫酸厂高砷废水的研究与应用. 矿冶,2003,12(1):79-81 Wu Zhaoqing, Chen Liaoyuan, Xu Guoqiang, et al. Study on treating high-arsenic wastewater from sulfuric acid plant with lime-ferrate process. Mining & Metallurgy, 2003,12(1):79-81(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [9] 董准勤. 含砷酸性废水的处理. 硫酸工业, 2006, 48(5):49-50 Dong Zhunqin. Removal arsenic from acid wastewater. Sulphuric Acid Industry, 2006,48 (5):49-50(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [10] De Klerk R.J., Jia Y., Daenzer R., et al. Continuous circuit coprecipitation of arsenic(V) with ferric iron by lime neutralization: Process parameter effects on arsenic removal and precipitate quality. Hydrometallurgy, 2009,111-112 (1):65-72

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [11] 黄荣. 金昌冶炼厂污水处理工程的工艺改造. 有色金属, 2002, 54(3):124-126 Huang Rong. Technical transformation of sewage disposal system in Jing Chang smelter. Nonferrous Metals, 2002, 54(3):124-126(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [12] Meltem Bilici Baskan, Aysegul Pala. Determination of arsenic removal efficiency by ferric ions using response surface methodology. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 166(2-3):796-801

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [13] 易求实, 李敦顺. 从国家危险废物标准角度思考硫酸厂酸性废水处理技术.硫酸工业,2009,51 (2):39-44 Yi Qiushi, Li Dunshun. Consideration on treatment technology ofacidic wastewater in sulphuric acid plant from the national emission standards for hazardous waste. Sulphuric Acid Industry, 2009, 51(2):39-44(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [14] 李亚林, 黄羽, 杜冬云. 利用硫化亚铁从污酸废水中回收砷. 化工学报, 2008, 59(5):1294-1298 Li Yalin, Huang Yu, Du Dongyun. Recovering arsenic fromw aste acid water with ferrous sulfide in producing vitriol. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2008, 59(5):1294-1298(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [15] 易求实, 杜冬云, 鲍霞杰, 等. 高效硫化回收技术处理高砷净化污酸的研究. 硫酸工业, 2009, (6): 6-10 Yi Qiushi, Du Dongyun, Bao Xiajie, et al. Study on treatment of high-efficiency sulphuration recovery technology. Sulphuric Acid Industry, 2009, (6): 6-10(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [16] 屈娜. 贵冶硫化中和法除砷工艺探讨. 铜业工程, 2009, (2): 16-19 Qu Na. On arsenic removal process by sulphurization mixing in guixi smelter. Copper Engineering, 2009, (2):16-19(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar Pub Med

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(2388) PDF downloads(1218) Cited by(0)

Access History

A comparative study on treatment of impure acid with low-concentration arsenic

Fund Project:

Abstract: The arsenic removal efficiency from low concentration acid wastewater was evaluated by lime neutralization and the combination of lime with ferric iron in the present study. It was found that the level of arsenic, copper, lead and zinc could satisfy the limits specified by the hazardous waste discharge standard (GB 5085.3-2007) leached out of the arsenic-containing solid waste from the combination of lime with ferric iron treatment process. Therefore, the combined utilization was the preferred process because of its higher efficiency and innocuous compared with single lime neutralization. The corresponding parameters were also evaluated to achieve the optimized arsenic removal efficiency. The results indicated that the acid solutions were neutralized with lime in two hours to a final pH value of 2 in the first stage; the second-stage involved with Ca(ClO)2 oxidation with a Ca(ClO)2/As molar ratio of 6, ferric flocculation with a Fe/As molar ratio of 8, and lime neutralization to a final pH of 8 within an hour. After the two stages, the residual concentration of arsenic could below the tolerance level (0.3 mg/L) without any hazardous precipitates. The orthogonal design showed that the significance of the contribution of the above four factors to arsenic removal is ranked as: final pH of reacted solution > reaction time > Fe/As mole ratio > content of oxidant.

Reference (16)

Catalog

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint