Yao Hong, Wang Hui, Su Jialiang, Sun Peizhe, Huang Chinghua. Removal of five antibiotics from a drinking water treatment plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(3): 801-809.
Citation: Yao Hong, Wang Hui, Su Jialiang, Sun Peizhe, Huang Chinghua. Removal of five antibiotics from a drinking water treatment plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(3): 801-809.

Removal of five antibiotics from a drinking water treatment plant

  • Received Date: 18/10/2012
    Accepted Date: 21/09/2012
    Available Online: 18/03/2013
    Fund Project:
  • The study showed the removal performance of the five target antibiotics (clarithromycin(CLA), erythromycin-H2O(ERY), levofloxacin(LEV), sulfamethoxazole(SUL) and trimethoprim(TRI)) in each treatment process of drinking water treatment plants in the U.S. The removal efficiency was analysed via the influence of time and space, respectively, and the relationship between the removal rate of antibiotics and water quality parameters was discussed. The results showed that the average concentrations of the five antibiotics in source water ranged from 0 to 26.8 ng/L, while 0 to 2.3 ng/L in effluent. The total removal efficiency of the antibiotics in the water treatment processes was 79.5% with CLA 92.8%,ERY 24%,LEV 100%,SUL 85.7%,TRI 53.2%,respectively. The residual concentration of these antibiotics in each sampling place at different sampling time all showed that autumn’s got to the highest, but the removal rates of different treatment units weren’t the same in different seasons.CLA could be used as an indicating antibiotic to predict the trend of the total concentration of antibiotic. There was a good positive correlation between the value or removal rate of UV254 and those of the antibiotics.So we could forecast the fate of the antibiotics by calculating the value and removal rate of UV254.It provided the basis to the plant design and choice of treatment processes in China with the research about removal performance of five antibiotics from drinking water treatment plants.
  • [1] Ternes T. A.,Stuber J.,Herrmann N.,et al. Ozonation: A tool for removal of pharmaceuticals,contrast media and musk fragrances from wastewater. Water Research, 2003,37(8):1976-1978

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [2] EPA. Pharmaceuticals & Personal Care Products in the Environment: An Emerging Concern, 1999-12-24/2005-3-20

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [3] Marta C., Francisco O., Juan M. L., et al. Behavior of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and hormones in a sewage treatment plant. Water Research,2004,38(12):2918-2926

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [4] Westerhoff P.,Yoon Y.,Snyder S.,et al.Fate of endocrine-disruptor,pharmaeeutical,and personal care product chemicals during simulated drinking water treatment processes. Environmental Science and Technology, 2005,39(17):6649-6663

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [5] 俞道进,曾振灵,陈杖榴.四环素类抗生素残留对水生态环境影响的研究进展.中国兽医学报,2004,24(5):515-517 Yu Daojin, Zeng Zhenling, Chen Zhangliu. Progress of studies on water eco-environment effects of residual tetracycline. Chinese Journal of Voterinary Science, 2004, 24(5): 515-517(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [6] Robers P. H.,Thomas K.V. The occurrence of selected pharmaceuticals in wastewater effluent and surface waters of the lower Tyne catchment. Science of the Total Environment, 2006,356(1-3):143-153

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [7] Kasprzyk-Hordern B., Dinsdale R.,Guwy A.J.The occurrence of pharmaceuticals,personal careproducts,endocrine disrupt or sand illicit drugs in surface water in South Wales,UK.Water Research,2008,42(13):3498-3518

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [8] Managaki S.,Murata A.,Takada H., et al. Distribution of macrolides, sulfonamides, andtrimethoprimin tropical waters: Ubiquitous occurrence of veterinary antibiotics in the Mekong Delta. Environmental Science& Technology,2007,41(23):8004-8010

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [9] 徐维海,张干,邹世春,等.典型抗生素类药物在城市污水处理厂中的含量水平及其行为特征.环境科学,2007,28(8):1779-1783 Xu Weihai,Zhang Gan,Zou Shichun. Occurrence, distribution and fate of antibiotics in sewage treatment plants.Environmental Science,2007,28(8):1779-1783 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [10] Adams C., Wang Y., Loftin K., et al. Removal of antibiotics from surface and distilled water in conventional water treatment processes. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2002, 128(3): 253-260

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [11] Gobel A., Thomsen A., McArdell C. S., et al. Occurrence and sorption behavior of sulfonamides, macrolides, and trimethoprim in activated sludge treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005,39(11):3981-3989

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [12] Pérez S., Eichhorn P., Aga D. S. Evaluating the biodegradability of sulfamethazine, sulfamethoxazole,sulfathiazole, and trimethoprim at different stages of sewage treatment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemystry, 2005,24(6):1361-1367

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [13] Hao C.Y., Zhao X.M., Tabe S., et al. Optimization of a multiresidual method for the determination of waterborne emerging organic pollutants using solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry and isotope dilution mass spectrometry. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008,42(11): 4068-4075

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [14] Eaton A.D., Clesceri L.S., Greenberg A.E., et al. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, 1998

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [15] Nakada N., Shinohara H., Murata A., et al. Removal of selected pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and endocrine-disrupting chemicals (ED Cs) during sand filtration and ozonation at a municipal sewage treatment plant. Water Research, 2007,41(19):4373-4382

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [16] Esplugas S., Bila D.M., Krause L.G.T. Ozonation and advanced oxidation technologies to remove endocrine disrupting chemicals(EDCs) and pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in water effluents. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2007,149(3):631-642

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [17] Mark J., Benotti, Rebecca A. Trenholm, et al. Pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupting compounds in U.S.drinking water. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009, 43(3):597-603

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [18] Ma Rosa Boleda, Ma Teresa Galceran, Francesc Ventura.Behavior of pharmaceuticals and drugs of abuse in a drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) using combined conventional and ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis (UF/RO) treatments.Environmental Pollution,2011,159(6):1584-1591

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [19] 石为民,刘凯英,叶文婷,等.磺胺甲噁唑在给水处理系统中的迁移转化及去除研究.水处理技术,2011,37(6):86-94 Shi Weimin,Liu Kaiying,Ye Wenting,et al. Study on transformation and removal of sulfamethoxazolum in water treatment system. Technology of Water Treatment,2011,37 (6):86-94 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    [20] 徐维海,张干,邹世春,等.香港维多利亚港和珠江广州河段水体中抗生素的含量特征及其季节变化.环境科学,2006,27 (12):2458-2462 Xu Weihai,Zhang Gan,Zou Shichun,et al. Occurrence and seasonal changes of antibiotics in the victoria harbour and the Pearl River, South China. Environmental Science,2006,27(12):2458-2462(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar Pub Med

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(2681) PDF downloads(1318) Cited by(0)

Access History

Removal of five antibiotics from a drinking water treatment plant

Fund Project:

Abstract: The study showed the removal performance of the five target antibiotics (clarithromycin(CLA), erythromycin-H2O(ERY), levofloxacin(LEV), sulfamethoxazole(SUL) and trimethoprim(TRI)) in each treatment process of drinking water treatment plants in the U.S. The removal efficiency was analysed via the influence of time and space, respectively, and the relationship between the removal rate of antibiotics and water quality parameters was discussed. The results showed that the average concentrations of the five antibiotics in source water ranged from 0 to 26.8 ng/L, while 0 to 2.3 ng/L in effluent. The total removal efficiency of the antibiotics in the water treatment processes was 79.5% with CLA 92.8%,ERY 24%,LEV 100%,SUL 85.7%,TRI 53.2%,respectively. The residual concentration of these antibiotics in each sampling place at different sampling time all showed that autumn’s got to the highest, but the removal rates of different treatment units weren’t the same in different seasons.CLA could be used as an indicating antibiotic to predict the trend of the total concentration of antibiotic. There was a good positive correlation between the value or removal rate of UV254 and those of the antibiotics.So we could forecast the fate of the antibiotics by calculating the value and removal rate of UV254.It provided the basis to the plant design and choice of treatment processes in China with the research about removal performance of five antibiotics from drinking water treatment plants.

Reference (20)

Catalog

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint