Cao Yanxiao, Long Tengrui, Huang Xiangrong, Gong Zheng, Fu Chanyuan. Comparative study of low carbon source wastewater treatment by hydrolysis acidification/anoxic moving biological biofilm reactor/aerobic process and conventional anoxic/aerobic process[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2010, 4(12): 2776-2780.
Citation: Cao Yanxiao, Long Tengrui, Huang Xiangrong, Gong Zheng, Fu Chanyuan. Comparative study of low carbon source wastewater treatment by hydrolysis acidification/anoxic moving biological biofilm reactor/aerobic process and conventional anoxic/aerobic process[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2010, 4(12): 2776-2780.

Comparative study of low carbon source wastewater treatment by hydrolysis acidification/anoxic moving biological biofilm reactor/aerobic process and conventional anoxic/aerobic process

  • Received Date: 16/11/2009
    Accepted Date: 22/10/2009
    Fund Project:
  • The hydrolysis acidification (H)/anoxic moving biological biofilm reactor (AMBBR)/aerobic (O) process was employed to improve the content of easily biodegradable organisms in low carbon source wastewater, and it was compared with the conventional anoxic (A)/aerobic (O) process, to see its feasibility in nitrogen removal of low carbon source wastewater. Denitrification performance of both sludge from the two processes were investigated at low temperatures(10.9~13℃), and the laboratory pilot scale operation of the two processes were also studied. Results from bench scale test show that the nitrate removal efficiency of two-phase sludge from AMBBR was 19.4% higher than that of single anoxic sludge. Also, results from pilot scale test showed that under the same conditions, the removal efficiencies of COD and ammonia were almost the same in both process, while total nitrogen removal efficiency in H/AMBBR/O process was always higher than that of A/O process, and the D-value attains 22.39% under their best conditions. Besides, in the process of H/AMBBR/O, sludge reduction was realized through backflow hydrolysis. It was believed that the H/AMBBR/O process could improve carbon source effectively, especially in warm areas.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(1499) PDF downloads(923) Cited by(0)

Access History

Comparative study of low carbon source wastewater treatment by hydrolysis acidification/anoxic moving biological biofilm reactor/aerobic process and conventional anoxic/aerobic process

Fund Project:

Abstract: The hydrolysis acidification (H)/anoxic moving biological biofilm reactor (AMBBR)/aerobic (O) process was employed to improve the content of easily biodegradable organisms in low carbon source wastewater, and it was compared with the conventional anoxic (A)/aerobic (O) process, to see its feasibility in nitrogen removal of low carbon source wastewater. Denitrification performance of both sludge from the two processes were investigated at low temperatures(10.9~13℃), and the laboratory pilot scale operation of the two processes were also studied. Results from bench scale test show that the nitrate removal efficiency of two-phase sludge from AMBBR was 19.4% higher than that of single anoxic sludge. Also, results from pilot scale test showed that under the same conditions, the removal efficiencies of COD and ammonia were almost the same in both process, while total nitrogen removal efficiency in H/AMBBR/O process was always higher than that of A/O process, and the D-value attains 22.39% under their best conditions. Besides, in the process of H/AMBBR/O, sludge reduction was realized through backflow hydrolysis. It was believed that the H/AMBBR/O process could improve carbon source effectively, especially in warm areas.

Reference (0)

Catalog

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint