Liu Yuan, Wu Xiaofeng. Numerical methods comparison in simulating contaminants movement in groundwater[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2008, 2(2).
Citation: Liu Yuan, Wu Xiaofeng. Numerical methods comparison in simulating contaminants movement in groundwater[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2008, 2(2).

Numerical methods comparison in simulating contaminants movement in groundwater

  • Received Date: 04/11/2007
    Accepted Date: 03/08/2007
    Fund Project:
  • Numerical simulation technology has been playing an important role in groundwater researches. After the development of MT3D, it has been widely used to predict and evaluate the fate and transport of the dissolved contaminants in groundwater. MT3D has four different numerical solvers in it—MOC, HMOC, MMOC and UFDM. In order to research the applicability of these four different numerical methods, a one dimensional numerical groundwater flow model was developed via Processing MODFLOW Pro.7.0.5, 14 cases, combined by different dispersivities, adsorption coefficients and degradation rates, were simulated, and the results were compared with the theoretical results. Suggestions on how to select the numerical solvers for different simulating needs are summarized based on this research.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionDOWNLOAD: 5.1 %DOWNLOAD: 5.1 %FULLTEXT: 78.4 %FULLTEXT: 78.4 %META: 16.5 %META: 16.5 %DOWNLOADFULLTEXTMETAHighcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 68.4 %其他: 68.4 %Ann Arbor: 0.1 %Ann Arbor: 0.1 %Ashburn: 1.5 %Ashburn: 1.5 %Baima: 0.0 %Baima: 0.0 %Beijing: 14.0 %Beijing: 14.0 %Bieligutai: 0.0 %Bieligutai: 0.0 %Brooklyn: 0.0 %Brooklyn: 0.0 %Cangzhou: 0.1 %Cangzhou: 0.1 %Chengdu: 0.0 %Chengdu: 0.0 %Dalian: 0.1 %Dalian: 0.1 %Davis: 0.1 %Davis: 0.1 %Fenjihu: 0.0 %Fenjihu: 0.0 %Foshan: 0.0 %Foshan: 0.0 %Guangzhou: 0.1 %Guangzhou: 0.1 %Guangzhou Shi: 0.1 %Guangzhou Shi: 0.1 %Guri-si: 0.1 %Guri-si: 0.1 %Hangzhou: 1.2 %Hangzhou: 1.2 %Hefei: 0.1 %Hefei: 0.1 %Jeddah: 0.1 %Jeddah: 0.1 %Jinan: 0.1 %Jinan: 0.1 %Jining: 0.0 %Jining: 0.0 %Jinrongjie: 4.3 %Jinrongjie: 4.3 %Kyoto: 0.1 %Kyoto: 0.1 %Lanzhou: 0.0 %Lanzhou: 0.0 %Laocheng: 0.1 %Laocheng: 0.1 %Liuxiang: 0.1 %Liuxiang: 0.1 %luohe shi: 0.0 %luohe shi: 0.0 %Moscow: 0.1 %Moscow: 0.1 %Mountain View: 0.1 %Mountain View: 0.1 %Nanjing: 0.0 %Nanjing: 0.0 %Nashville: 0.0 %Nashville: 0.0 %New York: 0.0 %New York: 0.0 %Newark: 0.4 %Newark: 0.4 %Qingdao: 0.1 %Qingdao: 0.1 %Qinnan: 0.1 %Qinnan: 0.1 %Shanghai: 0.6 %Shanghai: 0.6 %Shangrao: 0.1 %Shangrao: 0.1 %Shenzhen: 0.1 %Shenzhen: 0.1 %Shijiazhuang: 0.4 %Shijiazhuang: 0.4 %Suzhou: 0.0 %Suzhou: 0.0 %Tainan City: 0.1 %Tainan City: 0.1 %Taiyuan: 0.1 %Taiyuan: 0.1 %Tianjin: 0.1 %Tianjin: 0.1 %Tongchuanshi: 0.0 %Tongchuanshi: 0.0 %Urayasu: 0.0 %Urayasu: 0.0 %Wuhan: 0.3 %Wuhan: 0.3 %Wuhu: 0.1 %Wuhu: 0.1 %Wuxi: 0.0 %Wuxi: 0.0 %Xi'an: 0.2 %Xi'an: 0.2 %Xiamen: 0.1 %Xiamen: 0.1 %Xiangfan: 0.0 %Xiangfan: 0.0 %Xingfeng: 0.3 %Xingfeng: 0.3 %XX: 3.0 %XX: 3.0 %Yancheng: 0.0 %Yancheng: 0.0 %Yangzhou: 0.1 %Yangzhou: 0.1 %Yangzi: 0.1 %Yangzi: 0.1 %Zhongshan: 0.0 %Zhongshan: 0.0 %上海: 0.0 %上海: 0.0 %丽水: 0.0 %丽水: 0.0 %北京: 0.5 %北京: 0.5 %山景: 0.0 %山景: 0.0 %杭州: 0.1 %杭州: 0.1 %武汉: 0.0 %武汉: 0.0 %济南: 0.0 %济南: 0.0 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %苏州: 0.0 %苏州: 0.0 %郑州: 0.1 %郑州: 0.1 %重庆: 0.0 %重庆: 0.0 %防城港: 0.0 %防城港: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.0 %其他Ann ArborAshburnBaimaBeijingBieligutaiBrooklynCangzhouChengduDalianDavisFenjihuFoshanGuangzhouGuangzhou ShiGuri-siHangzhouHefeiJeddahJinanJiningJinrongjieKyotoLanzhouLaochengLiuxiangluohe shiMoscowMountain ViewNanjingNashvilleNew YorkNewarkQingdaoQinnanShanghaiShangraoShenzhenShijiazhuangSuzhouTainan CityTaiyuanTianjinTongchuanshiUrayasuWuhanWuhuWuxiXi'anXiamenXiangfanXingfengXXYanchengYangzhouYangziZhongshan上海丽水北京山景杭州武汉济南深圳苏州郑州重庆防城港阳泉Highcharts.com
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(6997) PDF downloads(12297) Cited by(0)

Access History

Numerical methods comparison in simulating contaminants movement in groundwater

Fund Project:

Abstract: Numerical simulation technology has been playing an important role in groundwater researches. After the development of MT3D, it has been widely used to predict and evaluate the fate and transport of the dissolved contaminants in groundwater. MT3D has four different numerical solvers in it—MOC, HMOC, MMOC and UFDM. In order to research the applicability of these four different numerical methods, a one dimensional numerical groundwater flow model was developed via Processing MODFLOW Pro.7.0.5, 14 cases, combined by different dispersivities, adsorption coefficients and degradation rates, were simulated, and the results were compared with the theoretical results. Suggestions on how to select the numerical solvers for different simulating needs are summarized based on this research.

Reference (0)

Catalog

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint