| Li D S, Suh S. Health risks of chemicals in consumer products: A review[J]. Environment International, 2019, 123: 580-587 |
| Geueke B, Groh K, Muncke J. Food packaging in the circular economy: Overview of chemical safety aspects for commonly used materials[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 193: 491-505 |
| Huang L, Ernstoff A, Fantke P, et al. A review of models for near-field exposure pathways of chemicals in consumer products[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 574: 1182-1208 |
| United States Government Printing Office. The Clean Water Act[S]. Washington, DC: Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the United States House of Representatives, 2023 |
| United States Government Printing Office. The Clean Air Act[S]. Washington, DC: Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the United States House of Representatives, 2023 |
| Tao M Y, Li D S, Song R S, et al. OrganoRelease—A framework for modeling the release of organic chemicals from the use and post-use of consumer products[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2018, 234: 751-761 |
| Fantke P, Illner N. Goods that are good enough: Introducing an absolute sustainability perspective for managing chemicals in consumer products[J]. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2019, 15: 91-97 |
| de Boer J, Stapleton H M. Toward fire safety without chemical risk[J]. Science, 2019, 364(6437): 231-232 |
| Jhamb S, Liang X D, Gani R, et al. Systematic model-based methodology for substitution of hazardous chemicals[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(8): 7652-7666 |
| European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC[S]. Brussels: European Commission, 2006 |
| Li M, Harten P F, Cabezas H. Experiences in designing solvents for the environment[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2002, 41(23): 5867-5877 |
| Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Transitioning to safer chemicals: A toolkit for employers and workers[EB/OL]. (2021-05-29)[2024-11-18]. http://www.osha.gov/dsg/safer_chemicals/why_transition.html |
| Fantke P, Weber R, Scheringer M. From incremental to fundamental substitution in chemical alternatives assessment[J]. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 2015, 1: 1-8 |
| Blum A, Behl M, Birnbaum L, et al. Organophosphate ester flame retardants: Are they a regrettable substitution for polybrominated diphenyl ethers?[J]. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2019, 6(11): 638-649 |
| McMullan J T. Refrigeration and the environment：Issues and strategies for the future[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2002, 25(1): 89-99 |
| Arnold S M, Greggs B, Goyak K O, et al. A quantitative screening-level approach to incorporate chemical exposure and risk into alternative assessment evaluations[J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2017, 13(6): 1007-1022 |
| Geiser K, Tickner J, Edwards S, et al. The architecture of chemical alternatives assessment[J]. Risk Analysis, 2015, 35(12): 2152-2161 |
| Kwiatkowski C F, Andrews D Q, Birnbaum L S, et al. Scientific basis for managing PFAS as a chemical class[J]. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2020, 7(8): 532-543 |
| Fantke P, Huang L, Overcash M, et al. Life cycle based alternatives assessment (LCAA) for chemical substitution[J]. Green Chemistry, 2020, 22(18): 6008-6024 |
| Oguzcan S, Dvarioniene J, Tugnoli A, et al. Environmental impact assessment model for substitution of hazardous substances by using life cycle approach[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2019, 254(Pt A): 112945 |
| Phillips K A, Yau A, Favela K A, et al. Suspect screening analysis of chemicals in consumer products[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(5): 3125-3135 |
| Zimmerman J B, Anastas P T. Chemistry toward substitution with no regrets[J]. Science, 2015, 347(6227): 1198-1199 |
| The Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Institute. Five chemicals study: Alternatives assessment process guidance[R]. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Lowell, 2006 |
| The Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Institute. Five chemicals alternatives assessment study[R]. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Lowell, 2006 |
| Rossi M, Tickner J, Geiser K. Alternatives assessment framework of the Lowell Center for Sustainable Production[R]. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Lowell, 2006 |
| Ad Hoc Working Group on Substitution and Alternatives of the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee of the Stockholm Convention. Report of the persistent organic pollutants review committee on the work of its fifth meeting. Addendum: General guidance on considerations related to alternatives and substitutes for listed persistent organic pollutants and candidate chemicals[R]. Geneva: United Nations Environment Program, 2009 |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Design for the environment alternatives assessments[EB/OL]. (2015-08-15)[2024-11-18]. https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice/design-environment-alternatives-assessments |
| California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Developing regulatory alternatives analysis methodologies for the California green chemistry initiative[R]. State of California: California Department of Toxic Substances Control, 2015 |
| GHS Sub-Committee. Globally harmonized system of classifications and labeling of chemicals (GHS)[R]. New York: United Nations, 2023 |
| Federal Environmental Agency. Guide on Sustainable Chemicals: A Decision Tool for Substance Manufacturers, Formulators and End Users of Chemicals[S]. Berlin: Federal Environmental Agency, 2011 |
| Clean Production Action (CPA). Promote safer chemicals and products with GreenScreen®[EB/OL]. (2024-05-10)[2024-11-18]. http://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Safer chemical ingredients list (SCIL)[EB/OL]. (2024-01-10)[2024-11-18]. https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice/safer-ingredients |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). EPA’s Safer Choice Program Master Criteria for Safer Ingredients[S]. Washington, DC: Office of Pollution Prevention & Toxics, 2012 |
| European Chemical Agency. Guidance on the preparation of an application for authorization[R]. Helsinki: European Chemical Agency, 2011 |
| European Chemical Agency. Strategy to promote substitution to safer chemicals through innovation[R]. Helsinki: European Chemical Agency, 2018 |
| California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Safer consumer products[R]. Sacramento: California Department of Toxic Substances Control, 2013 |
| Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Guidance on key considerations for the identification and selection of safer chemical alternatives[R]. Paris: Environment, Health and Safety, Environment Directorate, OECD, 2021 |
| Technical Alternative Assessment Guide Team. Interstate chemicals clearinghouse alternatives assessment guide[R]. Washington, DC: Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse, 2017 |
| Gauthier A M, Fung M, Panko J, et al. Chemical assessment state of the science: Evaluation of 32 decision-support tools used to screen and prioritize chemicals[J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2015, 11(2): 242-255 |
| Tickner J, Jacobs M, Malloy T, et al. Advancing alternatives assessment for safer chemical substitution: A research and practice agenda[J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2019, 15(6): 855-866 |
| Blum A, Behl M, Birnbaum L, et al. Organophosphate ester flame retardants: Are they a regrettable substitution for polybrominated diphenyl ethers?[J]. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2019, 6(11): 638-649 |
| Zheng Z Y, Peters G M, Arp H P H, et al. Combining in silico tools with multicriteria analysis for alternatives assessment of hazardous chemicals: A case study of decabromodiphenyl ether alternatives[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(11): 6341-6351 |
| Zheng Z Y, Arp H P H, Peters G, et al. Combining In silico tools with multicriteria analysis for alternatives assessment of hazardous chemicals: Accounting for the transformation products of decaBDE and its alternatives[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(2): 1088-1098 |
| London R L, Gluge J, Scheringer M. Are hazard assessment methods in the assessment of chemical alternatives suitable for REACH?[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2024, 58(42): 18811-18821 |
| London R L, Gluge J, Scheringer M. Multiple-criteria decision analysis for assessments of chemical alternatives (MCDA-ACA)[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2024, 58(43): 19315-19324 |
| Arnold S M, Greggs B, Goyak K O, et al. A quantitative screening-level approach to incorporate chemical exposure and risk into alternative assessment evaluations[J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2017, 13(6): 1007-1022 |
| Brown L A, Fisk G, Cohen M A, et al. Using an alternatives assessment framework to evaluate waterborne versus solventborne basecoats used in automotive refinishing[J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2022, 18(4): 1101-1113 |
| van Dijk J, Figuière R, Dekker S C, et al. Managing PMT/vPvM substances in consumer products through the concepts of essential-use and functional substitution: A case-study for cosmetics[J]. Environmental Science Processes & Impacts, 2023, 25(6): 1067-1081 |
| National Academy of Sciences of United States. A framework to guide selection of chemical alternatives[R]. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences of United States, 2014 |
| Eliason P, Morose G. Safer alternatives assessment: The Massachusetts process as a model for state governments[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2011, 19(5): 517-526 |
| Malloy T F, Sinsheimer P J, Blake A, et al. Use of multi-criteria decision analysis in regulatory alternatives analysis: A case study of lead free solder[J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2013, 9(4): 652-664 |
| Malloy T F, Zaunbrecher V M, Batteate C M, et al. Advancing alternative analysis: Integration of decision science[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2017, 125(6): 066001 |
| McFadden R D. The business case for transitioning to safer chemicals[J]. New Solutions, 2011, 21(3): 403-416 |
| Jacobs M M, Malloy T F, Tickner J A, et al. Alternatives assessment frameworks: Research needs for the informed substitution of hazardous chemicals[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2016, 124(3): 265-280 |
| Gerst M D, Kenney M A, Howard B E, et al. A decision-analytic approach to screening in chemical alternatives assessment[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2020, 29(3): 1597-1604 |
| Malloy T F, Zaunbrecher V M, Batteate C M, et al. Advancing alternative analysis: Integration of decision science[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2017, 125(6): 066001 |
| Tickner J A, Schifano J N, Blake A, et al. Advancing safer alternatives through functional substitution[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(2): 742-749 |
| Lavoie E T, Heine L G, Holder H, et al. Chemical alternatives assessment: Enabling substitution to safer chemicals[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(24): 9244-9249 |
| 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 产品生态设计通则: GB/T 24256—2009[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009 |
| 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 生态设计产品评价通则: GB/T 32161—2015[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016 |