[1] International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV). OIV statistical report on world vitiviniculture [DB/OL]. (2021-07-16) [2022-12-28]. https: //www. oiv. int.
[2] VITAL-JACOME M A, BUITRÓN G. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of winery effluents in a two-stage process and the effect of the feeding frequency on methane production[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 272: 129865. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129865
[3] KEYSER M, WITTHUHN R C, RONQUEST L C, et al. Treatment of winery effluent with upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB): Granular sludges enriched with Enterobacter sakazakii[J]. Biotechnology Letters, 2003, 25(22): 1893-1898. doi: 10.1023/B:BILE.0000003978.72266.96
[4] RUIZ C, TORRIJOS M, SOUSBIE P, et al. Treatment of winery wastewater by an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2002, 45(10): 219-224. doi: 10.2166/wst.2002.0336
[5] IOANNOU L A, PUMA G L, FATTA-KASSINOS D. Treatment of winery wastewater by physicochemical, biological and advanced processes: A review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 286: 343-368. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.043
[6] LIANG X Y, RENGASAMY P C, SMERNIK R, et al. Does the high potassium content in recycled winery wastewater used for irrigation pose risks to soil structural stability?[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 243: 106422. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106422
[7] BEZERRA R A, RODRIGUES J A, RATUSZNEI S M, et al. Effect of organic load on the performance and methane production of an AnSBBR treating effluent from biodiesel production[J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2011, 165(1): 347-368. doi: 10.1007/s12010-011-9255-6
[8] LOVATO G, MONCAYO BRAVO I S, RATUSZNEI S M, et al. The effect of organic load and feed strategy on biohydrogen production in an AnSBBR treating glycerin-based wastewater[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 154: 128-137.
[9] CARVALHINHA P P, FLÔRES A, RODRIGUES J A D, et al. AnSBBR applied to the treatment of metalworking fluid wastewater: effect of organic and shock load[J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2010, 162(6): 1708-1724. doi: 10.1007/s12010-010-8952-x
[10] VÁSQUEZ J, NAKASAKI K. Effects of shock loading versus stepwise acclimation on microbial consortia during the anaerobic digestion of glycerol[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2016, 86: 129-135. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.02.001
[11] 熊荣波, 柳丽, 孟艳, 李屹, 等. 含固率和接种比对菜籽饼中温厌氧消化特性的影响[J]. 环境科学研究, 2022, 35(1): 230-237. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2021.08.20
[12] LI D, CHEN L, LIU X F, et al. Instability mechanisms and early warning indicators for mesophilic anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 245: 90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.098
[13] LI J Z, YAN H, CHEN Q Y, et al. Performance of anaerobic sludge and the microbial social behaviors induced by quorum sensing in a UASB after a shock loading[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 330: 124972. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124972
[14] 赵阳, 李秀芬, 堵国成, 等. 钴及其配合物对产甲烷关键酶的影响[J]. 水资源保护, 2008, 24(2): 82-85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6933.2008.02.022
[15] ZHAO Z Q, ZHANG Y B, YU Q L, et al. Communities stimulated with ethanol to perform direct inter species electron transfer for syntrophic metabolism of propionate and butyrate[J]. Water Research, 2016, 102: 475-484. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.07.005
[16] 李韧, 于莉芳, 张兴秀, 等. 硝化生物膜系统对低温的适应特性: MBBR和IFAS[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(8): 3691-3698.
[17] BASSET N, SANTOS E, DOSTA J, et al. Start-up and operation of an AnMBR for winery wastewater treatment[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 86: 279-289. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.11.003
[18] CHAI S L, GUO J, CHAI Y, et al. Anaerobic treatment of winery wastewater in moving bed biofilm reactors[J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2014, 52(10): 1841-1849.
[19] LI L, PENG X Y, WANG X M, et al. Anaerobic digestion of food waste: A review focusing on process stability[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 248: 20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.012
[20] YUAN K, LI S, ZHONG F. Treatment of coking wastewater in biofilmbased bioaugmentation process: Biofilm formation and microbial community analysis[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 400(13): 123117.
[21] 柴立, 薛旭东, 邓彦, 等. 冲击负荷对厌氧序批式反应器的影响及其恢复重建过程[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2013, 35(9): 54-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3865.2013.09.011
[22] REYNOLDS P J, COLLERAN E. Evaluation and improvement of methods for coenzyme F420 analysis in anaerobic sludges[J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 1987, 7(2/3): 115-130.
[23] WILÉN B M, JIN B, LANT P. The influence of key chemical constituents in activated sludge on surface and flocculating properties[J]. Water Research, 2003, 37(9): 2127-2139. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00629-2
[24] THOMAS S, DERLON N, DUEHOLM M S, et al. Extracellular polymeric substances of biofilms: Suffering from an identity crisis[J]. Water Research, 2019, 151(15): 1-7.
[25] YOU G X, HOU J, WANG P F, et al. Effects of CeO2 nanoparticles on sludge aggregation and the role of extracellular polymeric substances: Explanation based on extended DLVO[J]. Environmental Research, 2016, 151: 698-705. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.08.023
[26] KONG D W, ZHANG K Q, LIANG J F, et al. Methanogenic community during the anaerobic digestion of different substrates and organic loading rates[J]. MicrobiologyOpen, 2019, 8(5): e00709. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.709
[27] HUANG W H, WANG Z Y, ZHOU Y, et al. The role of hydrogenotrophic methanogens in an acidogenic reactor[J]. Chemosphere, 2015, 140: 40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.047