国外污染场地制度控制及对我国场地风险管控的启示

马妍; 史鹏飞; 彭政; 魏国; 康日峰; 熊忠; 樊艳玲; 刘增俊; 王东; 王丽芳

doi:10.12030/j.cjee.202203079

[1]

HOU D Y, GUTHRIE P, RIGBY M. Assessing the trend in sustainable remediation: A questionnaire survey of remediation professionals in various countries[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 184(Pt 1): 18-26

[2]

姜林, 梁竞, 钟茂生, 等. 复杂污染场地的风险管理挑战及应对[J]. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34(2): 458-467. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.07.14

[3]

李云祯, 董荐, 刘姝媛, 等. 基于风险管控思路的土壤污染防治研究与展望[J]. 生态环境学报, 2017, 26(6): 1075-1084.

[4]

陈卫平, 谢天, 李笑诺, 等. 中国土壤污染防治技术体系建设思考[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(3): 557-568. doi: 10.11766/trxb201711300488

[5]

常春英, 董敏刚, 邓一荣, 等. 粤港澳大湾区污染场地土壤风险管控制度体系建设与思考[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(12): 5570-5580.

[6]

王国庆, 林玉锁. 结合《土壤污染防治行动计划》探讨中国土壤环境监管制度与标准值体系建设[J]. 中国环境管理, 2016, 8(5): 39-43.

[7]

姜林, 张文毓, 钟茂生, 等. 危险物质泄漏场地污染应急响应与清理制度及关键技术[J]. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34(10): 2438-2445.

[8]

焦文涛, 方引青, 李绍华, 等. 美国污染地块风险管控的发展历程、演变特征及启示[J]. 环境工程学报, 2021(5): 1-10. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.202011037

[9]

马妍, 董彬彬, 谢云峰, 等. 美国污染场地制度控制经验及实践应用[J]. 环境保护, 2016, 44(Z1): 98-101.

[10]

马妍, 董彬彬, 柳晓娟, 等. 美国制度控制在污染地块风险管控中的应用及对中国的启示[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2018, 40(1): 100-103.

[11]

李笑诺, 陈卫平, 吕斯丹. 国内外污染场地风险管控技术体系与模式研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(1): 38-53.

[12]

LI F, ZHANG J D, JIANG W, et al. Spatial health risk assessment and hierarchical risk management for mercury in soils from a typical contaminated site, China[J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2017, 39(4): 923-934. doi: 10.1007/s10653-016-9864-7

[13]

LUO Q, CATNEYa P, LERNER D. Risk-based management of contaminated land in the UK: lessons for China?[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(2): 1123-1134. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.001

[14]

HOU J, TEO T S H, ZHOU F, et al. Does industrial green transformation successfully facilitate a decrease in carbon intensity in China? An environmental regulation perspective[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 184: 1060-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.311

[15]

苑克帅. 我国污染场地再开发风险管控法律规制研究[D]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2016.

[16]

陈梦舫, 骆永明, 宋静, 等. 中、英、美污染场地风险评估导则异同与启示[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2011, 23(3): 14-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2009.2011.03.004

[17]

刘凯, 马英, 杨大卜, 等. 某典型冶炼场地重金属污染风险管控方案及效果评估[J]. 中国环保产业, 2020(5): 46-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5377.2020.05.012

[18]

黄沈发, 杨洁, 吴健, 等. 城市再开发场地污染风险管控研究及实践[J]. 环境保护, 2018, 46(1): 31-35. doi: 10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2018.01.005

[19]

郑阳, 余湛, 胡佳晨, 等. 浙江省某退役工业场地修复治理及风险管控工程实例[J]. 广东化工, 2019, 46(10): 115-117. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1865.2019.10.050

[20]

周杜牧, 范秀娟, 李雯香, 等. 污染场地风险控制性修复设计的应用研究[J]. 广东化工, 2018, 45(5): 194-196. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1865.2018.05.089

[21]

杨洁. 基于安全利用的污染地块风险管控与治理修复模式在上海的探索与实践[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. http://huanbao.bjx.com.cn/news/20200618/1082174-2.shtml,2020

[22]

国务院. 土壤污染防治行动计划[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-05/31/content_5078377.htm,2016

[23]

环境保护部. 污染地块土壤环境管理办法(试行) [EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bl/201701/t20170118_394953.htm, 2017

[24]

第十三届全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 中华人民共和国土壤污染防治法[J]. [EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/fl/201809/t20180907_549845.shtml, 2018

[25]

生态环境部. 污染地块风险管控与土壤修复效果评估技术导则(试行): HJ 25.5-2018 [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2018.

[26]

生态环境部. 污染地块地下水修复和风险管控技术导则: HJ25.6-2019 [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2019.

[27]

生态环境部. 建设用地土壤污染风险管控和修复术语HJ 682-2019 [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2019.

[28]

张俊丽, 王芳, 余勤飞, 等. 工业企业场地再开发的多部门联合监管机制探讨[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2014, 36(12): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3865.2014.12.001

[29]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Superfund remedy report 16^th Edition[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/documents/100002509.pdf,2020

[30]

AUSTRALIA. Guideline on implementing institutional controls[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. 2018

[31]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Creese & Cook tannery (former) Superfund Site record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents, 2019

[32]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. H&H burn pit Superfund Site record of decision amendment[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[33]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. North alcoa (alcoa properties) Superfund alternative site operable unit 2 record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[34]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Operable unit 2 of the semet residue ponds subsite of the onondaga lake Superfund Site record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2019

[35]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. West troy contaminated aquifer Superfund Site record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[36]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Arsenic mine Superfund Site record of decision [EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[37]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Barrels, Inc. Superfund Site record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[38]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Cabo rojo groundwater contamination Superfund Site record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2019

[39]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Centredale manor restoration project Superfund Site xxplanation of significant differences[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents, 2020

[40]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Chlor-alkali facility (fomer) Superfund Site record of decision, Doc ID 649279[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents, 2020

[41]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Declaration for explanation of significant differences new hampshire plating company Superfund Site[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[42]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Del amo facility Superfund Site soil and NAPL operable unit record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents, 2020

[43]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Devil’s swamp lake Superfund Site record of decision [EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[44]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Explanation of significant differences allied chemical ironton coke Superfund Site [EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2019

[45]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Final zone 3 record of decision amendment for vapor intrusion[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[46]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Industrial operations area record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[47]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Interim record of decision for operable unit 1 at the Barite Hill / Nevada goldfields Superfund Site [EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[48]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Kerr-mcgee Columbus operable unit2 Superfund Site record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[49]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Montrose Superfund Site dense non-aqueous phase liquid operable unit record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[50]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. MRP site 1-fomer carr point shooting range record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[51]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Nyanza chemical waste dump Superfund Site operable unit 02 record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[52]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Old roosevelt field contaminated groundwater area Superfund Site record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2018

[53]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Operable unit (OU) 12 amendment for vapor intrusion record of decision [EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2019

[54]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. PCE former dry cleaner site operable unit 1 – sitewide groundwater record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[55]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Post and lumber wood preserving Superfund Site record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[56]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Quendall terminals Superfund Site operable units 1 and 2 record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[57]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Recommended evaluation of institutional controls: supplement to the “comprehensive five-year review guidance”[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P100PHRW.PDF?Dockey=P100PHRW.PDF,2011

[58]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Record of decision amendment 2 (interim remedy) operable unit 2 (groundwater) davis liquid waste Superfund Site[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[59]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Record of decision for an interim action at universal oil products operable unit 2 [EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2019

[60]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Record of decision for operable unit1 keystone corridor ground water contamination Superfund Site[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[61]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Sherwin-Williams/Hilliards creek Superfund Site operable unit 2 record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[62]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Teledyne semiconductor and spectra-physics, Inc. Superfund Sites record of decision [EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2020

[63]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Walton & Lonsbury, int. Superfund Site record of decision[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/search-superfund-decision-documents,2019

[64]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Institutional controls: a guide to planning, implementing, maintaining, and enforcing institutional controls at contaminated sites [EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/documents/final_pime_guidance_december_2012.pdf,2012

[65]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Institutional controls: a guide to preparing institutional control implementation and assurance plans at contaminated sites[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/documents/iciap_guidance_final_-_12.04.2012.pdf,2012

[66]

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Institutional controls: a site manager’s guide to identifying, evaluating and selecting institutional controls at Superfund and RCRA corrective action cleanups[EB/OL]. [2021-11-5]. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/documents/icfactfinal.pdf, 2000

[67]

National Research Council. Alternatives for Managing the Nation's Complex Contaminated Groundwater Sites[J]. Washington, D. C. :The National Academies Press, 2012: 125-127.