干/湿混法对中温SCR催化剂碱土金属中毒的影响

陈叮叮, 沈伯雄, 刘智, 潘奕君, 刘丽君, 卢凤菊. 干/湿混法对中温SCR催化剂碱土金属中毒的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2019, 13(3): 694-700. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201808151
引用本文: 陈叮叮, 沈伯雄, 刘智, 潘奕君, 刘丽君, 卢凤菊. 干/湿混法对中温SCR催化剂碱土金属中毒的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2019, 13(3): 694-700. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201808151
CHEN Dingding, SHEN Boxiong, LIU Zhi, PAN Yijun, LIU Lijun, LU Fengju. Effect of dry/wet mixing on alkaline earth metal poisoning in commercial medium temperature SCR catalyst[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2019, 13(3): 694-700. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201808151
Citation: CHEN Dingding, SHEN Boxiong, LIU Zhi, PAN Yijun, LIU Lijun, LU Fengju. Effect of dry/wet mixing on alkaline earth metal poisoning in commercial medium temperature SCR catalyst[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2019, 13(3): 694-700. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201808151

干/湿混法对中温SCR催化剂碱土金属中毒的影响

  • 基金项目:

    国家重点研发计划资助项目2018YFB0605101,2016YFC0209202

    天津市自然科学重点基金资助项目18JCZDJC39800国家重点研发计划资助项目(2018YFB0605101,2016YFC0209202)

    天津市自然科学重点基金资助项目(18JCZDJC39800)

Effect of dry/wet mixing on alkaline earth metal poisoning in commercial medium temperature SCR catalyst

  • Fund Project:
  • 摘要: 为探究碱土金属中毒规律以及中毒方法对中毒的影响,采用干混法和湿混法模拟CaO和MgO对商业催化剂的中毒过程。研究中毒后催化剂脱硝特性的改变及差异,并对催化剂中毒前后催化剂物理、化学性能变化进行探究。结果表明:湿混法模拟SCR催化剂中毒后脱硝效率的降低大于干混法;模拟中毒实验应该采用干混法;湿混法对于催化剂比表面积、孔径分布、表面V5+含量以及化学吸附氧的不利影响强于干混法;CaO对催化剂脱硝效率的降低大于MgO。2种中毒方法的对比研究为延长催化剂寿命提供了理论依据。
  • 加载中
  • [1] 陈鸿伟, 罗敏, 王远鑫, 等. 燃煤锅炉飞灰对SCR脱硝催化剂的影响及预防措施[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2017, 23(3): 200-211.
    [2] LI X, LI J H, PENG Y, et al. Regeneration of commercial SCR catalysts: Probing the existing forms of arsenic oxide[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(16): 9971-9978.
    [3] 袁玲, 邱兆富, 杨骥, 等. SCR催化剂碱(土)金属中毒及其改性再生研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 35(4): 117-120.
    [4] LI J H, PENG Y, HU C Z, et al. Chemical poison and regeneration of SCR catalysts for NOx removal from stationary sources[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2016, 10(3): 413-427.
    [5] KR?CHER O, ELSENER M. Chemical deactivation of V2O5/WO3-TiO2 SCR catalysts by additives and impurities from fuels, lubrication oils, and urea solution: I. Catalytic studies[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2008, 77(3): 215-227.
    [6] 沈伯雄, 卢凤菊, 高兰君, 等. 中温商业SCR催化剂碱和碱土中毒特性研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2016, 44(4): 500-506.
    [7] DU X S, YANG G P, CHEN Y R, et al. The different poisoning behaviors of various alkali metal containing compounds on SCR catalyst[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 392: 162-168.
    [8] GUO R T, WANG Q S, PAN W G, et al. The poisoning effect of Na and K on Mn/TiO2 catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3: A comparative study[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2014, 317: 111-116.
    [9] RAMOS-LUNA M A, CEDEN?O-CAERO L. Effect of sulfates and reduced-vanadium species on oxidative desulfurization (ODS) with V2O5/TiO2 catalysts[J]. Indengchemres, 2010, 50(5): 2641-2649.
    [10] 崔力文, 宋浩, 吴卫红, 等. 电站失活SCR催化剂再生试验研究[J]. 能源工程, 2012, 5(3): 43-46.
    [11] GUO R T, WANG S X, PAN W G, et al. Different poisoning effects of K and Mg on the Mn/TiO2 catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3: A mechanistic study[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121(14): 7881-7891.
    [12] 熊丽仙, 沈伯雄, 杨晓燕, 等. 纳米负载型V2O5-WO3/TiO2催化剂碱及碱土金属中毒[J]. 环境化学, 2010, 29(4): 690-695.
    [13] WANG H, CHEN X, GAO S, et al. Deactivation mechanism of Ce/TiO2 selective catalytic reduction catalysts by the loading of sodium and calcium salts[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2013, 3(3): 715-722.
    [14] CHEN L, LI J, GE M. The poisoning effect of alkali metals doping over nano V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalysts on selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 170(2): 531-537.
    [15] BUSCA G, LIETTI L, RAMIS G, et al. Chemical and mechanistic aspects of the selective catalytic reduction of NOx by ammonia over oxide catalysts: A review[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 1998, 18(1/2): 1-36.
    [16] INOMATA M, MIYAMOTO A, MURAKAMI Y. Mechanism of the reaction of NO and NH3 on vanadium oxide catalyst in the presence of oxygen under the dilute gas condition[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1980, 62(1): 140-148.
    [17] 刘福东, 单文坡, 石晓燕, 等. 用于NH3选择性催化还原NOx的钒基催化剂[J].化学进展, 2012, 24(4): 445-455.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  3499
  • HTML全文浏览数:  3454
  • PDF下载数:  114
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 刊出日期:  2019-03-14

干/湿混法对中温SCR催化剂碱土金属中毒的影响

  • 1. 河北工业大学能源与环境工程学院,天津 300401
基金项目:

国家重点研发计划资助项目2018YFB0605101,2016YFC0209202

天津市自然科学重点基金资助项目18JCZDJC39800国家重点研发计划资助项目(2018YFB0605101,2016YFC0209202)

天津市自然科学重点基金资助项目(18JCZDJC39800)

摘要: 为探究碱土金属中毒规律以及中毒方法对中毒的影响,采用干混法和湿混法模拟CaO和MgO对商业催化剂的中毒过程。研究中毒后催化剂脱硝特性的改变及差异,并对催化剂中毒前后催化剂物理、化学性能变化进行探究。结果表明:湿混法模拟SCR催化剂中毒后脱硝效率的降低大于干混法;模拟中毒实验应该采用干混法;湿混法对于催化剂比表面积、孔径分布、表面V5+含量以及化学吸附氧的不利影响强于干混法;CaO对催化剂脱硝效率的降低大于MgO。2种中毒方法的对比研究为延长催化剂寿命提供了理论依据。

English Abstract

参考文献 (17)

目录

/

返回文章
返回