高级搜索

几种硫化物对紫色土汞的稳定化效果及优化稳定条件

,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

陈杰, 刘洁, 李顺奇, 王璐瑶, 魏世强. 几种硫化物对紫色土汞的稳定化效果及优化稳定条件[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(3): 893-903. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201710147
引用本文: 陈杰, 刘洁, 李顺奇, 王璐瑶, 魏世强. 几种硫化物对紫色土汞的稳定化效果及优化稳定条件[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(3): 893-903. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201710147
shu
CHEN Jie, LIU Jie, LI Shunqi, WANG Luyao, WEI Shiqiang. Effects of several sulfur compounds on stabilization of mercury in purple soil and appropriate stabilizing conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(3): 893-903. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201710147
Citation: CHEN Jie, LIU Jie, LI Shunqi, WANG Luyao, WEI Shiqiang. Effects of several sulfur compounds on stabilization of mercury in purple soil and appropriate stabilizing conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(3): 893-903. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201710147
shu

几种硫化物对紫色土汞的稳定化效果及优化稳定条件

  • 1.

    ?西南大学资源环境学院，重庆??400716

  • 2.

    ?重庆市农业资源与环境研究重点实验室，重庆??400716

  • 3.

    ?三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室，重庆??400716

  • 基金项目:

    重庆市科学技术委员会重点研发计划项目（cstc2017shms-zdyf0036）

    国家重点基础研究发展计划（973）项目（2013CB430003-04）

Effects of several sulfur compounds on stabilization of mercury in purple soil and appropriate stabilizing conditions

  • 1.

    College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China

  • 2.

    Chongqing Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Chongqing 400716, China

  • 3.

    Key Laboratory of the Eco-Environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region, Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400716, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 以西南地区广泛分布的紫色土-灰棕紫泥为对象，探讨了硫化物种类（S、Na2S、FeS、Na2S2O3和DTCR（二硫代氨基甲酸盐））、用量对不同水平汞污染土壤的稳定化效果。结果表明5种硫化物对土壤汞均具有显著的稳定化效果。固定S:Hg摩尔比为1:1条件下，在1.5～250?mg·kg-1汞污染土壤中，几种硫化物稳定效率相对大小顺序：DTCR>Na2S>Na2S2O3>S>FeS。Na2S和DTCR在高浓度汞污染土壤中均表现较高的稳定化效果，在不同汞污染浓度下均能在3 d内使土壤浸出汞浓度满足美国固体废弃物毒性浸出程序（TCLP）浸出标准要求（0.2?mg·L-1），Na2S2O3稳定效果相对较差，对250?mg·kg-1的汞污染土壤，稳定化处理时间需要15?d才能达到浸出标准要求，当汞污染浓度≥150?mg·kg-1时，S和FeS不能满足浸出标准要求。固定汞污染浓度为150?mg·kg-1，稳定化效果取决于硫化物的用量，其中，仍然以DTCR效果最好，S:Hg=1稳定化处理3?d时即可达汞浸出标准。Na2S和Na2S2O3则均需要在较高的浓度下才能实现汞的稳定化，但是过高的用量会导致土壤中HgS再次溶解，两者的最佳施用量为S:Hg=5。元素S和FeS则需要以S:Hg>5稳定化处理7?d以上才能达到浸出标准要求。土壤中汞的浸出活性与其赋存形态有关，交换态（Exc-Hg）和碳酸盐结合态汞（Carb-Hg）与土壤浸出汞浓度呈显著正相关，高效稳定剂显著促进了汞向有机质结合态（OM-Hg）和残渣态（Res-Hg）转化。硫化物稳定化处理9个月内土壤中浸出汞浓度始终维持在极低水平，满足持续稳定化要求。
    Abstract: The effects of sulfide species (S, Na2S, FeS, Na2S2O3 and DTCR (sodium dithiocarbamate)) and concentrations on the stabilization mercury (Hg) were discussed in the gray-brown purple soil, which is widely distributed in the Southwest China. The results showed that the five sulfides had significant stabilization effect on Hg in soil. When the elemental S:Hg ratio is 1:1, the stabilizing efficiencies followed the order of DTCR>Na2S>Na2S2O3>S>FeS at Hg concentration ranged from 1.5 to 250?mg·kg-1 in soil. The Hg concentrations?in the leachate can reach to a very low level in 3 days after Na2S and DTCR treated, even under the highest Hg contaminated condition. Na2S2O3 showed lower passivation effect on soil Hg, it would take 15 days for the leaching Hg concentration to meet the stabilization criteria at soil Hg concentration of 250 mg·kg-1. S and FeS treatments cannot match the stabilization criteria when soil Hg≥150 mg·kg-1. At the constant soil Hg concentration of 150 mg·kg-1, the stabilization effect depends on the amount of sulfides, where DTCR still shows the best performances for the stabilization of soil Hg. Higher S:Hg ratios are needed to reach leaching standard both for Na2S and Na2S2O3 treatments, whereas the further higher dosage will cause the re-dissolution of HgS, and their optimum application rate is 5. It would take more than 7 days to meet the leaching standard both for S and FeS treatments with S:Hg ratio higher than 5. The soil Hg mobility is related to its speciation, and a significant positive correlation exists between exchangeable Hg(Exc-Hg), carbonate bound Hg (Carb-Hg) and the concentration of soil leaching Hg. The high efficiency stabilizer significantly promoted the transformation of exogenous Hg to organic affinity Hg(OM-Hg) and residual Hg(Res-Hg). The concentration Hg in the soil leachate was kept at a very low level within 9 months after soil treated by sulfides, indicating sulfides treatment can meet the requirements of continuous stabilization.
  • 加载中
  • [1] SPARKS D L.Environmental Soil Chemistry[M].Second Edition.New York: Academic Press, 2003:321-352
    [2] 李永华, 王五一, 杨林生, 等. 汞的环境生物地球化学研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2004,23(6):33-40 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.2004.06.004
    [3] 张庆辉. 汞环境地球化学特征[J]. 阴山学刊(自然科学版),2006,20(1):35-37 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1869-B.2006.01.013
    [4] TERZANO R, SPAGNUOLO M, MEDICI L, et al.Microscopic single particle characterization of zeolites synthesized in a soil polluted by copper or cadmium and treated with coal fly ash[J].Applied Clay Science,2007,35(1/2):128-138 10.1016/j.clay.2006.07.005
    [5] QIU G, FENG X, WANG S, et al.Mercury and methylmercury in riparian soil, sediments, mine-waste calcines, and moss from abandoned Hg mines in east Guizhou province, southwestern China[J].Applied Geochemistry,2005,20(3):627-638 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.09.006
    [6] 丁振华, 王文华, 瞿丽雅, 等. 贵州万山汞矿区汞的环境污染及对生态系统的影响[J]. 环境科学,2004,25(2):111-114
    [7] 郑冬梅, 王起超, 李志博, 等. 中国北方燃煤型和工业复合型城市汞污染对比研究[J]. 地球与环境,2007,35(3):273-278 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9250.2007.03.013
    [8] 尹炳奎, 黄满红, 李光明, 等. 云南某冶炼厂周围农田土壤重金属污染状况及生态风险评价 [J]. 有色金属工程,2017,7(1):92-96 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1744.2017.01.019
    [9] 王婷, 王静, 孙红文, 等. 天津农田土壤镉和汞污染及有效态提取剂筛选[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2012,31(1):119-124
    [10] PIAO H, BISHOP P L.Stabilization of mercury-containing wastes using sulfide[J].Environmental Pollution,2006,139(3):498-506 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.06.005
    [11] WANG J, FENG X, ANDERSON C W, et al.Implications of mercury speciation in thiosulfate treated plants[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2012,46(10):5361-5368 10.1021/es204331a
    [12] 林斯杰, 胡清, 张鹤清. 利用硫化钠和硅酸盐水泥实现汞污染土壤的固化稳定化处理[J]. 工业,2015(20):219-221
    [13] 魏赢, 刘阳生. 汞污染农田土壤的化学稳定化修复[J]. 环境工程学报,2017,11(3):1878-1884 10.12030/j.cjee.201512016
    [14] 陈宏, 陈玉成, 杨学春. 硫化钠对土壤汞、镉、铅的植物可利用性的调控[J]. 生态环境学报,2003,12(3):285-288 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2003.03.008
    [15] 金吟. 汞污染土壤化学稳定化修复技术[D].北京：北京化工大学,2012 10.7666/d.y2139471
    [16] 陆荣杰. 有机硫螯合剂对烟气脱硫液中汞离子的稳定化研究[D].杭州：浙江大学,2012
    [17] EPA U S. 1311 SW 846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods [M].Washington D C: Governmental Printing Office,1986
    [18] TESSIER A, CAMPBELL P G C, BISSON M.Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals[J].Analytical Chemistry,1979,51(7):844-851 10.1021/ac50043a017
    [19] 相波, 刘亚菲, 李义久, 等.DTC类重金属捕集剂研究的进展[J]. 电镀与环保,2003,23(6):1-4
    [20] ITO K, TA A T, BISHOP D B, et al.Mercury L3 and sulfur K-edge studies of Hg-bound thiacrowns and back-extracting agents used in mercury remediation[J].Microchemical Journal,2005,81(1):3-11 10.1016/j.microc.2005.02.001
    [21] BELLOS T J.Polyvalent metal cations in combination with dithiocarbamic acid compositions as broad spectrum demulsifiers: US 6019912 A[P]. 1994-11-03
    [22] 闫利刚, 李季, 孙尧, 等. 高浓度含汞盐泥的稳定化技术工程应用试验研究[J]. 江西理工大学学报,2017,38(1):61-65 10.13265/j.cnki.jxlgdxxb.2017.01.010
    [23] SHERENE T.Mobility and transport of heavy metals in polluted soil environment[J].Biological Forum,2010,2(2):112-121
    [24] YANG J Y, YANG X E, HE Z L, et al.Effects of pH, organic acids, and inorganic ions on lead desorption from soils[J].Environmental Pollution,2006,143(1):9-15 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.11.010
    [25] 曹心德, 魏晓欣, 代革联, 等. 土壤重金属复合污染及其化学钝化修复技术研究进展[J]. 环境工程学报,2011,5(7):1441-1453
    [26] 付煜恒, 张惠灵, 王宇, 等. 磷酸盐对铅镉复合污染土壤的钝化修复研究[J]. 环境工程,2017,35(9):176-180 10.13205/j.hjgc.201709036
    [27] 吴新民, 潘根兴. 影响城市土壤重金属污染因子的关联度分析[J]. 土壤学报,2003,40(6):921-928 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2003.06.018
    [28] 酆婧轩, 李芸邑, 师帅, 等. 硫代硫酸钠、磷酸钠联合处理铬渣中的六价铬[J]. 中国环境科学,2015,35(11):3333-3339 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2015.11.018
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2807
  • HTML全文浏览数:  2357
  • PDF下载数:  528
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 刊出日期:  2018-03-22

几种硫化物对紫色土汞的稳定化效果及优化稳定条件

  • 1. ?西南大学资源环境学院，重庆??400716
  • 2. ?重庆市农业资源与环境研究重点实验室，重庆??400716
  • 3. ?三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室，重庆??400716
基金项目:

重庆市科学技术委员会重点研发计划项目（cstc2017shms-zdyf0036）

国家重点基础研究发展计划（973）项目（2013CB430003-04）

摘要: 以西南地区广泛分布的紫色土-灰棕紫泥为对象，探讨了硫化物种类（S、Na2S、FeS、Na2S2O3和DTCR（二硫代氨基甲酸盐））、用量对不同水平汞污染土壤的稳定化效果。结果表明5种硫化物对土壤汞均具有显著的稳定化效果。固定S:Hg摩尔比为1:1条件下，在1.5～250?mg·kg-1汞污染土壤中，几种硫化物稳定效率相对大小顺序：DTCR>Na2S>Na2S2O3>S>FeS。Na2S和DTCR在高浓度汞污染土壤中均表现较高的稳定化效果，在不同汞污染浓度下均能在3 d内使土壤浸出汞浓度满足美国固体废弃物毒性浸出程序（TCLP）浸出标准要求（0.2?mg·L-1），Na2S2O3稳定效果相对较差，对250?mg·kg-1的汞污染土壤，稳定化处理时间需要15?d才能达到浸出标准要求，当汞污染浓度≥150?mg·kg-1时，S和FeS不能满足浸出标准要求。固定汞污染浓度为150?mg·kg-1，稳定化效果取决于硫化物的用量，其中，仍然以DTCR效果最好，S:Hg=1稳定化处理3?d时即可达汞浸出标准。Na2S和Na2S2O3则均需要在较高的浓度下才能实现汞的稳定化，但是过高的用量会导致土壤中HgS再次溶解，两者的最佳施用量为S:Hg=5。元素S和FeS则需要以S:Hg>5稳定化处理7?d以上才能达到浸出标准要求。土壤中汞的浸出活性与其赋存形态有关，交换态（Exc-Hg）和碳酸盐结合态汞（Carb-Hg）与土壤浸出汞浓度呈显著正相关，高效稳定剂显著促进了汞向有机质结合态（OM-Hg）和残渣态（Res-Hg）转化。硫化物稳定化处理9个月内土壤中浸出汞浓度始终维持在极低水平，满足持续稳定化要求。

English Abstract

参考文献 (28)

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心