UASB启动及不同HRT对老龄垃圾渗滤液处理效果的影响

刘子旭, 孙力平, 李玉友, 邱春生, 朱永强. UASB启动及不同HRT对老龄垃圾渗滤液处理效果的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(2): 483-488.
引用本文: 刘子旭, 孙力平, 李玉友, 邱春生, 朱永强. UASB启动及不同HRT对老龄垃圾渗滤液处理效果的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(2): 483-488.
Liu Zixu, Sun Liping, Li Yuyou, Qiu Chunsheng, Zhu Yongqiang. Impact of UASB start-up and different HRT on treatment effect of old landfill leachate[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(2): 483-488.
Citation: Liu Zixu, Sun Liping, Li Yuyou, Qiu Chunsheng, Zhu Yongqiang. Impact of UASB start-up and different HRT on treatment effect of old landfill leachate[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(2): 483-488.

UASB启动及不同HRT对老龄垃圾渗滤液处理效果的影响

  • 基金项目:

    国家水体污染控制与治理专项(2012ZX07308-002)

  • 中图分类号: X712

Impact of UASB start-up and different HRT on treatment effect of old landfill leachate

  • Fund Project:
  • 摘要: 在UASB反应器中接种好氧污泥培养厌氧颗粒污泥进行启动,研究不同HRT对老龄(13年)垃圾渗滤液对处理效果的影响情况。通过保持进水COD浓度不变、逐步缩短HRT从而提高容积负荷到40 g COD/(L·d)的方法,可以培育出直径为1~3 mm颗粒污泥,最终产气量稳定在100 L/d,甲烷含量在60%~70%之间,COD去除率保持在90%左右,污泥层最底部MLSS为81 g/L。逐步提高HRT依次为6、12、24、48和72 h考察其对处理效果的影响,当HRT为24 h时处理效果最好,COD去除率最高达到35%左右。
  • 加载中
  • [1] Surmacz-Gorska J. Degradation of Organic Compounds in Municipal Landfill Leachate. Publisher of Environmental Engineering Committee of Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, 2001
    [2] Li X. Z., Zhao Q. L. MAP precipitation from landfill leachate and seawater bitter waste.Environ. Technol.,2002,23(9):989-1000
    [3] Kang K. H., Shin H. S., Park H. K. Characterization of humic substances present in landfill leachates with different landfill ages and its implications. Water Research, 2002,36(16):4023-4032
    [4] Christensena J. B., Jensena D. L., Christian Grn, et al. Characterization of the dissolved organic carbon in landfill leachate-polluted groundwater. Water Research,1998,32(1):125-135
    [5] Peter K., Morton A. B., Alix P., et al. Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate:A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2002,32(4):297-336
    [6] Tonni A. K., Lo W. H., Gilbert Y. C. Physicochemical treatments for removal of recalcitrant contaminiants from landfill leachate. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006,129(1-3):80-100
    [7] Renou S., Givaudan J. G., Poulain S.,et al. Landfill leachate treatment: Review and opportunity. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,150(3):468-493
    [8] Wang F., Smith D. W., El-Din G. M. Application of advanced oxidation methods for landfill leachate treatment—a review.J. Environ.Eng. Sci.,2003,2(6):413-427
    [9] Héctor A. V., Bruce J., Simon J. J. Membrane bioreactors vs conventional biological treatment of landfill leachate: A brief review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.,2004,79(10):1043-1049
    [10] Chiang L., Chang J., Cung C. Electrochemical oxidation combined with hysical-chemical pretreatment processes for the treatment of refractory landfill leachate. Environ. Eng. Sci.,2001,18(6):369-378
    [11] Agdag O. N., Sponza D. T. Aanaerobic/aerobic treatment of municipal landfill leachate in sequential two-stage up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor(UASB)/completely stirred tank reactor (CSTR) system. Process Biochemistry,2005 40(2):895-902
    [12] Chen S., Sun D. Z., Chung J. S. Simultaneous removal of COD and ammonium from landfill leachate using anaerobic-aerobic moving-bed biofilm reactor system. Waste Management, 2007,28(2):339-346
    [13] Liang Z. Z., Liu J. X. Landfill leachate treatment with a novel process: Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (Anammox) combined with soil infiltration system. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,151(1):202-212
    [14] Ahn Y. H. Physicochemical and microbial aspects of anaerobic granular pellets.J. Environ. Sci. Health, 2000,35(9):1617-1635
    [15] Hulshoff L. W., Lettinga G., Lens P. N. L., et al. Anaerobic sludge granulation.Water Research,2004,38(6):1376-1389
    [16] Sharon M. H., Caroline O. R., Therese M., et al. Anaerobic granular sludge bioreactor technology. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology,2004,2(2-4):225-245
    [17] Bohdziewicza J., Kwarciakb A. The application of hybrid system UASB reactor-RO in landfill leachate treatment. Desalination,2008,222(1-3):128-134
    [18] Kennedy K. J., Lentz E. M. Treatment of landfill leachate using sequencing batch and continuous flow upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors. Wat. Res.,2000,34(14):3640-3656
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2095
  • HTML全文浏览数:  936
  • PDF下载数:  1237
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-08-08
  • 刊出日期:  2013-02-02
刘子旭, 孙力平, 李玉友, 邱春生, 朱永强. UASB启动及不同HRT对老龄垃圾渗滤液处理效果的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(2): 483-488.
引用本文: 刘子旭, 孙力平, 李玉友, 邱春生, 朱永强. UASB启动及不同HRT对老龄垃圾渗滤液处理效果的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(2): 483-488.
Liu Zixu, Sun Liping, Li Yuyou, Qiu Chunsheng, Zhu Yongqiang. Impact of UASB start-up and different HRT on treatment effect of old landfill leachate[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(2): 483-488.
Citation: Liu Zixu, Sun Liping, Li Yuyou, Qiu Chunsheng, Zhu Yongqiang. Impact of UASB start-up and different HRT on treatment effect of old landfill leachate[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(2): 483-488.

UASB启动及不同HRT对老龄垃圾渗滤液处理效果的影响

  • 1.  天津城市建设学院环境与市政工程学院,天津 300384
  • 2.  天津市水质科学与技术重点 实验室,天津 300384
  • 3.  日本东北大学,仙台 980-8576
基金项目:

国家水体污染控制与治理专项(2012ZX07308-002)

摘要: 在UASB反应器中接种好氧污泥培养厌氧颗粒污泥进行启动,研究不同HRT对老龄(13年)垃圾渗滤液对处理效果的影响情况。通过保持进水COD浓度不变、逐步缩短HRT从而提高容积负荷到40 g COD/(L·d)的方法,可以培育出直径为1~3 mm颗粒污泥,最终产气量稳定在100 L/d,甲烷含量在60%~70%之间,COD去除率保持在90%左右,污泥层最底部MLSS为81 g/L。逐步提高HRT依次为6、12、24、48和72 h考察其对处理效果的影响,当HRT为24 h时处理效果最好,COD去除率最高达到35%左右。

English Abstract

参考文献 (18)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回