3种环保型淋洗剂对重金属污染土壤的淋洗效果

姚瑶, 张世熔, 王怡君, 王贵胤, 徐小逊, 李婷. 3种环保型淋洗剂对重金属污染土壤的淋洗效果[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(7): 2039-2046. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801198
引用本文: 姚瑶, 张世熔, 王怡君, 王贵胤, 徐小逊, 李婷. 3种环保型淋洗剂对重金属污染土壤的淋洗效果[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(7): 2039-2046. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801198
YAO Yao, ZHANG Shirong, WANG Yijun, WANG Guiyin, XU Xiaoxun, LI Ting. Effects of different environmentally friendly washing agents on removal of soil heavy metals[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(7): 2039-2046. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801198
Citation: YAO Yao, ZHANG Shirong, WANG Yijun, WANG Guiyin, XU Xiaoxun, LI Ting. Effects of different environmentally friendly washing agents on removal of soil heavy metals[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(7): 2039-2046. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801198

3种环保型淋洗剂对重金属污染土壤的淋洗效果

  • 基金项目:

    四川省科技支撑计划项目(2014NZ0044)

    四川农业大学科研兴趣培养计划项目(20150154)

Effects of different environmentally friendly washing agents on removal of soil heavy metals

  • Fund Project:
  • 摘要: 采用振荡淋洗法研究衣康酸(IA)、丙烯酸-2-丙烯酰胺-2-甲基丙磺酸共聚物(AA/AMPS)和衣康酸-丙烯酸共聚物(IA-AA)在不同因素影响下对污染土壤Cd、Pb和Zn的淋洗效率。结果表明:3种淋洗剂对土壤Cd、Pb和Zn的去除率随其浓度增加而快速上升,随pH增加呈迅速下降和先升高后降低2种趋势,随淋洗时间总体呈上升趋势;3种淋洗剂在浓度为0.15 mol·L-1且pH为3时,对Cd和Zn去除率最高(39.34%~65.65%);在相同浓度和pH为5条件下对Pb的去除率最高(22.05%~50.62%)。其中IA-AA对Cd、Pb和Zn的去除率分别可达65.65%、50.62%和44.92%。它们去除的主要重金属组分为酸溶态、可还原态和部分可氧化态,且经IA和IA-AA淋洗的土壤养分损失相对较小。因此,IA-AA是修复Cd、Pb和Zn复合污染土壤有工程应用前景的淋洗剂。
  • 加载中
  • [1] BOLAN N, KUNHIKRISHNAN A, THANGARAJAN R, et al.Remediation of heavy metal(loid)s contaminated soils:To mobilize or to immobilize?[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014,266(4):141-166 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.018
    [2] 曹心德, 魏晓欣, 代革联, 等. 土壤重金属复合污染及其化学钝化修复技术研究进展[J]. 环境工程学报, 2011,5(7):1441-1453
    [3] KHALID S, SHAHID M, NIAZI N K, et al.A comparision of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2016,182:247-268 10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.11.021
    [4] DERMONT G, BERGERON M, MERCIER G, et al.Soil washing for metal removal: A review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008,152(1):1-31 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.043
    [5] YAO Z T, LI J H, XIE H H, et al.Review on remediation technologies of soil contaminated by heavy metals[J].Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2012,16(4):722-729 10.1016/j.proenv.2012.10.099
    [6] 陶虎春, 丁文毅, 李金波,等. 草酸-FeCl3复合淋洗剂对Pb、Zn污染土壤淋洗效果研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2017,17(5):1937-1941
    [7] 冯静, 张增强, 李念, 等. 铅锌厂重金属污染土壤的螯合剂淋洗修复及其应用[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015,9(11):5617-5625
    [8] MAO X H, JIANG R, XIAO W, et al.Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils: A review[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015,285:419-435 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.009
    [9] MONDALA A H.Direct fungal fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass into itaconic, fumaric, and malic acids: Current and future prospects[J].Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2015,42(4):487-506 10.1007/s10295-014-1575-4
    [10] 刘青霞. 一种毒性低易降解共聚物阻垢剂的制备及阻垢性能研究[J]. 山东化工, 2014,43(6):30-32
    [11] 刘奥灏, 于萍, 罗运柏.AA/AMPS和PBTCA阻垢性能机理研究[J]. 杭州化工, 2016,46(3):15-18
    [12] 张成芬.IA/AA/AMPS三元共聚物的合成及阻垢性能研究[J]. 工业水处理, 2011,31(6):70-72
    [13] PUEYO M, MATEU J, RIGOL A, et al.Use of the modified BCR three-step sequential extraction procedure for the study of trace element dynamics in contaminated soils[J].Environmental Pollution, 2008,152(2):330-341 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.020
    [14] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000
    [15] YANG R X, LUO C L, ZHANG G, et al.Extraction of heavy metals from e-waste contaminated soils using EDDS[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2012,24(11):1985-1994 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)61036-X
    [16] 李小孟,孟庆俊,高波,等.溶解性有机质对重金属在土壤中吸附和迁移的影响[J].科学技术与工程.2016,34(16):314-319
    [17] 吴烈善, 吕宏虹, 苏翠翠, 等. 环境友好型淋洗剂对重金属污染土壤的修复效果[J]. 环境工程学报, 2014,8(10):4486-4491
    [18] 郭晓方, 卫泽斌, 许田芬, 等. 不同pH值混合螯合剂对土壤重金属淋洗及植物提取的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011,27(7):96-100
    [19] OTTOSEN L M, HANSEN H K, JENSEN P E.Relation between pH and desorption of Cu, Cr, Zn, and Pb from industrially polluted soils[J].Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 2009,201(1/2/3/4):295-304 10.1007/s11270-008-9945-z
    [20] ZHANG W, TONG L, YUAN Y, et al.Influence of soil washing with a chelator on subsequent chemical immobilization of heavy metals in a contaminated soil[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010,178(1/2/3):578-587 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.124
    [21] 周卫红, 张静静, 邹萌萌, 等. 土壤重金属有效态含量检测与监测现状、问题及展望[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017,25(4):605-615
    [22] LESTAN D, UDOVIC M.Mobility and availability of toxic metals after soil washing with chelating agents[M]//KHAN M S, ZAIDI A, GOEL R, et al.Biomanagement of Metal-Contaminated Soils.Springer Netherlands,2011.
    [23] JELUSIC M, LESTAN D.Effect of EDTA washing of metal polluted garden soils.Part I: Toxicity hazards and impact on soil properties[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2014,475:132-141 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.049
    [24] YI Y M, SUNG K.Influence of washing treatment on the qualities of heavy metal-contaminated soil[J].Ecological Engineering, 2015,81(8):89-92 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.034
    [25] 贺海升, 王文杰, 朱虹. 盐碱地土壤改良剂施用对种子萌发和生长的影响. 生态学报, 2008,28(11):5338-5346
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  3339
  • HTML全文浏览数:  3058
  • PDF下载数:  333
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 刊出日期:  2018-07-26
姚瑶, 张世熔, 王怡君, 王贵胤, 徐小逊, 李婷. 3种环保型淋洗剂对重金属污染土壤的淋洗效果[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(7): 2039-2046. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801198
引用本文: 姚瑶, 张世熔, 王怡君, 王贵胤, 徐小逊, 李婷. 3种环保型淋洗剂对重金属污染土壤的淋洗效果[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(7): 2039-2046. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801198
YAO Yao, ZHANG Shirong, WANG Yijun, WANG Guiyin, XU Xiaoxun, LI Ting. Effects of different environmentally friendly washing agents on removal of soil heavy metals[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(7): 2039-2046. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801198
Citation: YAO Yao, ZHANG Shirong, WANG Yijun, WANG Guiyin, XU Xiaoxun, LI Ting. Effects of different environmentally friendly washing agents on removal of soil heavy metals[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(7): 2039-2046. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201801198

3种环保型淋洗剂对重金属污染土壤的淋洗效果

  • 1. 四川农业大学环境学院,成都 611130
  • 2. 四川农业大学资源学院,成都 611130
基金项目:

四川省科技支撑计划项目(2014NZ0044)

四川农业大学科研兴趣培养计划项目(20150154)

摘要: 采用振荡淋洗法研究衣康酸(IA)、丙烯酸-2-丙烯酰胺-2-甲基丙磺酸共聚物(AA/AMPS)和衣康酸-丙烯酸共聚物(IA-AA)在不同因素影响下对污染土壤Cd、Pb和Zn的淋洗效率。结果表明:3种淋洗剂对土壤Cd、Pb和Zn的去除率随其浓度增加而快速上升,随pH增加呈迅速下降和先升高后降低2种趋势,随淋洗时间总体呈上升趋势;3种淋洗剂在浓度为0.15 mol·L-1且pH为3时,对Cd和Zn去除率最高(39.34%~65.65%);在相同浓度和pH为5条件下对Pb的去除率最高(22.05%~50.62%)。其中IA-AA对Cd、Pb和Zn的去除率分别可达65.65%、50.62%和44.92%。它们去除的主要重金属组分为酸溶态、可还原态和部分可氧化态,且经IA和IA-AA淋洗的土壤养分损失相对较小。因此,IA-AA是修复Cd、Pb和Zn复合污染土壤有工程应用前景的淋洗剂。

English Abstract

参考文献 (25)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回