高级搜索

装填方式对混合床生物滤柱处理不同苯胺浓度染料废水的影响

,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

吴丽颖, 王滴, 洪俊明, 于永波, 张倩, 张圆春, 柴春省. 装填方式对混合床生物滤柱处理不同苯胺浓度染料废水的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(1): 72-78. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201706008
引用本文: 吴丽颖, 王滴, 洪俊明, 于永波, 张倩, 张圆春, 柴春省. 装填方式对混合床生物滤柱处理不同苯胺浓度染料废水的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(1): 72-78. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201706008
shu
WU Liying, WANG Di, HONG Junming, YU Yongbo, ZHANG Qian, ZHANG Yuanchun, CHAI Chunsheng. Effect of loading method on treatment of dye wastewater with different aniline concentration by mixed bed biological filter[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(1): 72-78. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201706008
Citation: WU Liying, WANG Di, HONG Junming, YU Yongbo, ZHANG Qian, ZHANG Yuanchun, CHAI Chunsheng. Effect of loading method on treatment of dye wastewater with different aniline concentration by mixed bed biological filter[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(1): 72-78. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201706008
shu

装填方式对混合床生物滤柱处理不同苯胺浓度染料废水的影响

  • 1.

    华侨大学化工学院,厦门361021

  • 2.

    山东省枣庄市建筑工程质量监督站,枣庄277800

  • 基金项目:

    福建省高校重大产学研项目(2014Y4006)

    厦门科技计划项目(3502Z20153025,3502Z20151256)

    泉州市科技计划项目(2016Z074)

Effect of loading method on treatment of dye wastewater with different aniline concentration by mixed bed biological filter

  • 1.

    College of Chemical Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China

  • 2.

    Construction Engineering Quality Supervision Station of Zaozhuang City, Shandong Province, Zaozhuang 277800, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 采用牡蛎壳和陶粒制备了多级生物滤柱(multistage bed-biological aerated filter, MSB-BAF)和混合生物滤柱(mixed bed-biological aerated filter, MB-BAF),研究其对偶氮染料活性黑5(reactive black 5, RBK5)废水中苯胺的处理效果。结果表明:在苯胺初始浓度从10～50 mg·L-1变化时,随着苯胺浓度的升高,MSB-BAF和MB-BAF出水的染料、苯胺、COD、氨氮的浓度变化不大,去除率分别可达90%、97%、95%、99%,出水pH维持在6.5～7.0之间。由于多级装填方式有利于牡蛎壳表面的分解和微生物的负载,MSB-BAF对总磷和苯胺的去除率优于MB-BAF,分别达82.76%和97.88%。
    Abstract: The combined multistage bed-biological aerated filter (MSB-BAF) and mixed bed-biological aerated filter (MB-BAF) carried out by using oyster shell as material to degrade reactive black 5 (RBK5) in wastewater. The results show that with the increasing of aniline concentrations (10 to 50 mg·L-1), the dye, aniline, COD and ammonia removal efficiency can reach up to 90%, 97%, 95% and 99%, respectively, and the pH maintained at 6.5 to 7.0. The phosphorus and aniline removal efficiency of MSB-BAF (97.88%) was much better than MB-BAF (82.76%), due to the advantages of microorganism loading and surface-decomposion on oyster shell.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 周学双.染料工业三废治理的发展方向[J].化工环保,1992,2(6):333-336
    [2] 吴勇民,陈新才,楼洪海,等.印染废水中苯胺类化合物处理的研究进展[J].印染,2014,40(2):51-54
    [3] 刘志培,杨惠芳,周培瑾.苯胺降解菌的分离和特性研究[J].环境科学学报,1999,19(2):64-69
    [4] 曾国驱,任随周,许玫英,等.ABR结合SBR法处理印染废水的研究[J].微生物学通报,2005,32(6):68-73
    [5] MUSTAFA I, DELIA T S.Aromatic amine degradation in a UASB/CSTR sequential system treating congo red dye[J].Environmental Letters,2003,8(10):2301-2315
    [6] 叶正芳,王中友,牟敬海,等.微电解与I-BAF组合工艺处理硝基甲苯废水中试[J].环境工程,2008,26(4):73-75
    [7] 刘文,李天华,张滕军,等.牡蛎壳中钙的改性及吸附特性的研究[J].材料导报,2012,26(18):88-92
    [8] LIU Y X, YANG T O, YUAN D X, et al.Study of municipal wastewater treatment with oyster shell as biological aerated filter medium[J].Desalination,2010,4(1/2/3):149-153
    [9] 彭义亮,熊小京,郑天凌,等.牡蛎壳生物滤池处理含盐污水中的硝化特性[J].环境工程学报,2014,8(5):1933-1938
    [10] 熊小京,黄智贤,景有海,等.牡蛎壳填料浸没式生物滤池的除磷特性[J].环境污染与防治,2003,25(6):329-331
    [11] 夏玉峰,洪俊明,金朝荣,等.混合床生物滤柱预处理恩杜罗消毒废水[J].环境工程学报,2015,9(11):5237-5242
    [12] HUSSEIN A, SCHOLZ M.Dye wastewater treatment by vertical-flow constructed wetlands[J].Ecological Engineering,2017,1:28-38
    [13] YASEEN D A, SCHOLZ M.Shallow pond systems planted with lemna minor, treating azo dyes[J].Ecological Engineering,2016,4:295-305
    [14] 陆洪宇,马文成,张梁,等.曝气生物滤池深度处理混合印染废水[J].环境工程学报,2013,7(7):2409-2413
    [15] 徐绮坤,汪晓军.曝气生物滤池在印染废水处理中的应用[J].环境科学与技术,2010,33(6):177-180
    [16] 梅巍,许峰.曝气生物滤池(BAF)工艺原理及印染废水深度处理中应用[J].中国新技术新产品,2009(14):7
    [17] 李文亮,谢经磊,尚重阳.苯胺类化合物微生物降解研究进展[J].环境科学与管理,2007,32(11):102-105
    [18] 申运栓,王中友,叶正芳,等.固定化微生物强化生物滤池处理硝基苯和苯胺废水[J].中国给水排水,2009,25(21):65-68
    [19] 山丹,马放,王金生,等.生物强化技术提高SBR系统对低温苯胺废水处理能力的研究[J].环境工程学报,2009,3(4):577-580
    [20] 刘志培,杨惠芳,周培瑾.苯胺降解菌的分离和特性研究[J].环境科学学报,1999,19(2):64-69
    [21] 于广平,苑明哲,王宏.活性污泥法污水处理数学模型的发展和应用[J].信息与控制,2006,35(5):614-618
    [22] 周大石,王莹,高晓光.细菌降解苯胺的生态研究[J].环境科学研究,1996,9(1):25-28
    [23] 于凤庆,孙宝盛,陈谊,等.MBR活性污泥培养驯化过程中生物多样性研究[J].环境科学学报,2012,32(9):2084-2090
    [24] 朱铁群,李凯慧,张杰.活性污泥驯化的微生物生态学原理[J].微生物学通报,2008,35(6):939-943
    [25] 于鑫,张晓健,刘晓玲,等.生物滤池中微生物的SOUR活性研究[J].中国给水排水,2004,20(3):16-20
    [26] 李伟博,洪俊明.两种膜生物反应器工艺在养殖废水处理中的运行效果[J].化工进展,2012,31(12):2791-2796
    [27] 杨宗政,顾平,张晓霞.MBR的DO分布及其对污染物去除的影响[J].中国给水排水,2004,20(8):54-57
    [28] HE S B, XUE G, WANG B Z.Factors affecting simultaneous nitrification and de-nitrification(SND)and its kinetics model in membrane bioreactor[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2009,8(2/3):704-710
    [29] WEN X, ZHOU J, WANG J L,et al.Effects of dissolved oxygen on microbial community of single-stage autotrophic nitrogen removal system treating simulating mature landfill leachate[J].Bioresource Technology,2016,8:962-968
    [30] YIN Z, SANTOS C E D D, VILAPLANA J G, et al.Importance of the combined effects of dissolved oxygen and pH on optimization of nitrogen removal in anammox-enriched granular sludge[J].Process Biochemistry,2016,1(9):1274-1282
    [31] 邹伟国,陆嘉竑,张辰,等.曝气生物滤池在脱氮除磷工艺中的应用[J].环境工程,2004,22(5):27-29
    [32] 张延青,陈江萍,沈加正,等.海水曝气生物滤器污染物沿程转化规律的研究[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(11):1808-1814
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2535
  • HTML全文浏览数:  2198
  • PDF下载数:  358
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 刊出日期:  2018-01-14

装填方式对混合床生物滤柱处理不同苯胺浓度染料废水的影响

  • 1. 华侨大学化工学院,厦门361021
  • 2. 山东省枣庄市建筑工程质量监督站,枣庄277800
基金项目:

福建省高校重大产学研项目(2014Y4006)

厦门科技计划项目(3502Z20153025,3502Z20151256)

泉州市科技计划项目(2016Z074)

摘要: 采用牡蛎壳和陶粒制备了多级生物滤柱(multistage bed-biological aerated filter, MSB-BAF)和混合生物滤柱(mixed bed-biological aerated filter, MB-BAF),研究其对偶氮染料活性黑5(reactive black 5, RBK5)废水中苯胺的处理效果。结果表明:在苯胺初始浓度从10～50 mg·L-1变化时,随着苯胺浓度的升高,MSB-BAF和MB-BAF出水的染料、苯胺、COD、氨氮的浓度变化不大,去除率分别可达90%、97%、95%、99%,出水pH维持在6.5～7.0之间。由于多级装填方式有利于牡蛎壳表面的分解和微生物的负载,MSB-BAF对总磷和苯胺的去除率优于MB-BAF,分别达82.76%和97.88%。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (32)

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心