前置反硝化生物滤池深度脱氮效能与影响因素
Nitrogen removal efficiency and influencing factors in a pre-denitrification bio-filter system
-
摘要: 前置反硝化生物滤池具有良好的脱氮性能,被广泛用于污水的深度处理。采用该工艺对城市污水处理厂尾水进行深度处理,通过调节硝化液回流比(50%、100%、150%)和水力负荷(1.0、1.5和2.0 m3·(m2·h)-1),考察前置反硝化生物滤池工艺对COD、TN、NH4+-N的去除效果。结果表明,当硝化液回流比为100%时,系统对污染物去除效果最好。在进水COD、TN、NH4+-N平均浓度为120、35和15 mg·L-1的水质条件下,出水COD、TN、NH4+-N平均浓度可降到7.62、5.02和0.60 mg·L-1,去除率分别为93.65%、85.65%和96.00%。在水力负荷为1.5 m3·(m2·h)-1条件下,系统对COD、TN和NH4+-N的平均去除率达到了83.00%、90.14%和95.73%,出水可以达到《城镇污水处理厂污染物排放标准》(GB 18918-2002)一级A标准。Abstract: Pre-denitrification bio-filter system is widely used in advance treatment of wastewater, owing to its excellent denitrification performance. A pre-denitrification bio-filter system was applied for treating laboratory simulated tail-water from municipal sewage treatment plant. By adjusting reflux ratio of nitrification liquor (50%, 100% and 150%) and hydraulic loading (1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 m3·(m2·h)-1), the removal efficiency of COD, TN and NH4+-N in the pre-denitrification bio-filter system were investigated. The results showed that, when the reflux ratio of nitrification liquor was 100%, the system had the best pollutants removal performance, the effluent concentrations of COD, TN and NH4+-N reduced from the 120, 35 and 15 mg·L-1 to 7.62, 5.02 and 0.60 mg·L-1, showing average removal efficiency of 93.65%, 85.65% and 96.00%, respectively. Under a hydraulic loading of 1.5 m3·(m2·h)-1, the average removal rates of COD, TN, NH4+-N reached to 83.00%, 90.14% and 95.73%, respectively, and the effluent water quality could meet the requirement of first grade A standards in Discharge Standard of Pollutants for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant (GB 18918-2002).
-
[1] HU H B, HAN H J, MA W C, et al. Research on a pre-denitrification double-layer media biological aerated filter in municipal wastewater treatment[J]. Desalination & Water Treatment, 2011, 31(1/2/3):366-371 [2] 邹海明, 谢越, 王艳, 等. 水力负荷和回流比对前置反硝化BAF系统处理玉米青贮液的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(10):3939-3945 [3] 韦彦斐, 张刚, 周童, 等. 水力负荷和HRT对前置反硝化BAF工艺的影响[J]. 中国给水排水, 2011, 27(3):94-97 [4] 林齐, 李冬, 林阳, 等. 曝气生物滤池升级改造中深度脱氮的试验研究[J]. 给水排水, 2011, 47(8):47-52 [5] SINHA B, ANNACHHATRE A P. Assessment of partial nitrification reactor performance through microbial population shift using quinone profile, FISH and SEM[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(18):3602-3610 [6] 彭晓兰, 陈吕军. 不同填料组合的曝气生物滤池前置反硝化工艺特性的比较研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(4):1207-1214 [7] 王劲松, 胡勇有.曝气生物滤池填料的研究进展[J]. 工业用水与废水, 2002, 33(5):7-9 [8] 杨威, 张雷坤, 余华荣, 等. 回流比对前置反硝化生物滤池的影响[J]. 哈尔滨商业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 30(2):190-193 [9] 郑俊, 汪荣, 张刚. 回流比对前置反硝化BAF处理效果的影响研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2007, 23(21):24-27 [10] 郭俊元, 杨春平, 曾龙云, 等. 回流比水力负荷对前置反硝化生物滤池工艺处理污水的影响研究[J].环境科学学报, 2010, 30(8):1615-1621 [11] URFER D, HUCK P M. Measurement of biomass activity in drinking water biofilters using a respirometric method[J]. Water Research, 2001, 35(6):1469-1477 [12] COLLINS A G, CLARKSON W W, VRONA M. Fixed-film biological nitrification of a strong industrial waste[J]. Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, 1988, 60(4):499-504 [13] 李汝琪, 钱易, 孔波, 等. 曝气生物滤池去除污染物的机理研究[J]. 环境科学, 1999, 20(6):49-52 [14] 李思敏, 陈利娜, 缪保芬. 不同回流比对UBAF脱氮性能的影响[J]. 工业用水与废水, 2010, 41(1):28-31 [15] 王立立, 胡勇有. 曝气生物滤池去除有机物及硝化氨氮的影响因素研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2006, 28(4):257-260 [16] 阎宁, 金雪标, 张俊清. 甲醇与葡萄糖为碳源在反硝化过程中的比较[J]. 上海师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 31(3):41-44
计量
- 文章访问数: 2712
- HTML全文浏览数: 2228
- PDF下载数: 641
- 施引文献: 0