撒施阻控材料快速去除上覆水Cd对的室内模拟研究

刘孝利; 铁柏清; 雷鸣; 曾昭霞; 魏祥东

doi:10.12030/j.cjee.201604216

撒施阻控材料快速去除上覆水Cd对的室内模拟研究

1.
湖南农业大学资源环境学院, 长沙 410128
2.
中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 北京 100085
3.
中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室, 长沙 410125
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（51409101）

湖南农业大学杨仁斌教授环境科学基金项目（14YB07）
中图分类号: X131

Laboratory simulation study on Cd rapid removal from the overlying water through scattering resistance materials

1.
College of Resources & Environment, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
2.
Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
3.
Key Laboratory of Agro-ecology Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
Fund Project:

摘要: 湘中矿区塘、水库等灌溉水体及其底泥重金属超标问题日益凸显，研究选取石灰、水稻秸秆生物炭和人造沸石等3种环境友好型土壤重金属阻控材料，通过室内玻璃柱模拟静止水体实验探讨水面缓慢撒施阻控材料对上覆水重金属Cd去除与底泥Cd有效性影响。为期60 d的实验结果显示，1%（0~20 cm表层底泥质量分数）的单一石灰、生物炭、沸石与石灰+生物炭+人造沸石配方（质量比1∶1∶1）4种处理均可明显快速去除上覆水中水溶态Cd质量浓度，其中石灰效果最佳，沸石效果最差，石灰与3种阻控剂组配处理均可使上覆水中水溶态Cd质量浓度由20 μg·L-1以上降至10 μg·L-1，符合我国灌溉水Cd的限定标准。阻控材料自然沉积在底泥表面后对5 cm处底泥水溶液Cd质量浓度具有一定的消减效应，沸石效果优于石灰、生物炭处理，其中"石灰+生物炭+沸石"的不同粒径阻控材料组配方式效果最佳。石灰、生物炭、沸石及3种阻控剂组配处理60 d后底泥pH值依然略高于对照，差异不显著，但可交换态Cd含量明显低于对照。结果可为塘库型水体上覆水及底泥Cd等重金属污染的生态风险降低及控制措施研究提供科学参考与方法指导。
- 灌溉水 /
- 底泥 /
- Cd超标 /
- 上覆水 /
- 阻控材料
Abstract: Heavy metal pollution of irrigation water and pond and reservoir sediment has been increasing. Lime, rice straw-derived biochar, and artificial zeolite are three kinds of soil heavy metal pollution resistance control materials, which were proven to be environmentally friendly, were selected to assess the rapid removal efficiency of Cd in overlying water and sediment Cd availability through water surface broadcasting under laboratory indoor glass column stationary water body simulation.Results of a 60 day period showed that all four treatments-lime, biochar, and zeolite treatments and a lime+biochar+zeolite (weight ratio 1:1:1) combination treatment-at a 1% mass ratio (0 to 20 cm sediment) application amount could quickly reduce the water soluble-Cd concentration from overlying water.Treatment with lime gave the best removal efficiency, followed by biochar and zeolite treatments.Lime treatment and the combination treatment obviously decreased the water soluble-Cd concentration from above 20 μg·L-1 to below 10 μg·L-1, which conforms to the irrigation water Cd limit standard in China.The three kinds of environmentally friendly resistance materials showed a consistent reduction effect on a 5 cm site with a sediment slurry solution containing Cd on the sediment surface from natural material deposits.A treatment combining the three materials showed the best reduction efficiency, and individually used zeolite showed better performance than that of lime and biochar.Results also revealed that the sediment pH in the four treatments was still slightly higher than that of the control experiment after 60 days.Though non-significant differences were observed, the exchangeable Cd was obviously decreased compared to that in the control experiment.The results provide some scientific references and guidance for reducing the ecological risks in ponds, overlying reservoir water, and sediments polluted by heavy metal Cd.
- irrigation water /
- sediment /
- Cd excess of the standards /
- overlying water /
- resistance control material

[1]	刘润堂, 许建中.我国污水灌溉现状、问题及其对策[J].中国水利, 2002, 10:123-125
[2]	姜国辉, 周雪梅, 李玉清, 等.不同浓度镉水灌溉对土壤及水稻品质的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2012, 26(5): 264-267
[3]	LIU K, LV J, HE W, et al.Major factors influencing cadmium uptake from the soil into wheat plants[J].Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2015, 113: 207-213
[4]	HU P, OUYANG Y, WU L, et al.Effects of water management on arsenic and cadmium speciation and accumulation in an upland rice cultivar[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2015, 27: 225-231
[5]	刘发欣, 高怀友, 伍军.镉的食物链迁移及其污染防治对策研究[J].农业环境科学学报, 2006, 25(增刊): 805-809
[6]	宋文恩, 陈世宝, 唐杰伟.稻田生态系统中镉污染及环境风险管理[J].农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(9):1669-1678
[7]	田伟莉, 柳丹, 吴家森, 等.动植物联合修复技术在重金属复合污染土壤修复中的应用[J].水土保持学报, 2013, 27(5):188-192
[8]	王发园, 林先贵.丛枝菌根在植物修复重金属污染土壤中的作用[J].生态学报, 2007, 27(2): 793-801
[9]	WANG D J, ZHANG W, HAO X Z, et al.Transport of Biochar Particles in Saturated Granular Media: Effects of Pyrolysis Temperature and Particle Size[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(2):821-828
[10]	BEESLEY L, INNEH O S, NORTON G J, et al.Assessing the influence of compost and biochar amendments on the mobility and toxicity of metals and arsenic in a naturally contaminated mine soil[J].Environmental Pollution, 2014, 186:195-202
[11]	李洪良, 邵孝侯, 黄鑫, 等.农田污水灌溉的危害研究进展与解决对策[J].节水灌溉, 2007, 2:14-17, 21
[12]	赵其国, 黄国勤, 马艳芹.中国南方红壤生态系统面临的问题及对策[J].生态学报, 2013, 33(24): 7615-7622
[13]	朱永官, 陈保冬, 林爱军, 等.珠江三角洲地区土壤重金属污染控制与修复研究的若干思考[J].环境科学学报, 2005, 25(12): 1575-1579
[14]	龙永珍, 戴塔根, 邹海洋.长沙、株洲、湘潭地区土壤重金属污染现状及评价[J].地球与环境, 2008, 36(3): 231-236
[15]	宁建凤, 邹献中, 杨少海, 等.广东大中型水库底泥重金属含量特征及潜在生态风险评价[J].生态学报, 2009, 29(11):6059-6067
[16]	王霞.黄河上游典型地区底泥重金属调查与污染评价[D].兰州:兰州交通大学,2014
[17]	王贵玲, 蔺文静.污水灌溉对土壤的污染及其整治[J].农业环境科学学报, 2003, 22(2): 163-166
[18]	LUCCHINI P, QUILLIAM R, DELUCA T H, et al.Does biochar application alter heavy metal dynamics in agricultural soil?[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2014, 184: 149-157
[19]	AKCAY H, OGUZ A, KARAPIRE C.Study of heavy metal pollution and speciation in Buyak Menderes and Gediz river sediments[J].Water Research, 2003, 37: 813-822
[20]	宁寻安, 陈文松, 李萍, 等.污染底泥修复治理技术研究进展[J].环境科学与技术, 2006, 29(9): 100-103
[21]	沈佳佳, 石艳洁, 吴丰昌, 等.原位掩蔽对底泥汞释放的抑制效果及中试评估[J].环境科学研究, 2015, 28(8): 1281-1287
[22]	王国莉, 陈孟君, 范红英, 等.四种土壤重金属形态分析方法的对比研究[J].生态环境学报, 2015, 24(5): 906-910
[23]	张晶, 苏德纯.不同镉污染农田土壤上秸秆和炭化秸秆分解动态及其对土壤镉的吸附特征[J].环境工程学报, 2013, 7(10): 4097-4102
[24]	黄益宗, 郝晓伟, 雷鸣, 等.重金属污染土壤修复技术及其修复实践[J].农业环境科学学报, 2013, 32(3):409-417
[25]	吴烈善, 曾东梅, 莫小荣, 等.不同钝化剂对重金属污染土壤稳定化效应的研究[J].环境科学, 2015, 36(1): 309-313
[26]	郭文娟, 梁学峰, 林大松, 等.土壤重金属钝化修复剂生物炭对镉的吸附特性研究[J].环境科学, 2013, 34(9): 3716-3721
[27]	KUMPIENE J, LAGERKVIST A, MAURICE C.Stabilization of As, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments-A review[J].Waste Management, 2008, 28(1): 215-225
[28]	沈洪艳, 张红燕, 刘丽, 等.淡水沉积物中重金属对底栖生物毒性及其生物有效性研究[J].环境科学学报, 2014, 34(1): 272-280
[29]	韦丽丽, 周琼, 谢从新, 等.三峡库区重金属的生物富集、生物放大及其生物因子的影响[J].环境科学, 2016, 37(1): 325-334
[30]	许炼烽, 邓绍龙, 陈继鑫, 等.河流底泥污染及其控制与修复[J].生态环境学报, 2014, 23(10): 1708-1715
[31]	李扬, 李锋民, 张修稳, 等.生物炭覆盖对底泥污染物释放的影响[J].环境科学, 2013, 34(8): 3071-3078
[32]	HOUBEN D, EVRARD L, SONNET P.Mobility, bioavailability and pH-dependent leaching of cadmium, zinc and lead in a contaminated soil amended with biochar[J].Chemosphere, 2013, 92(11): 1450-1457
[33]	CAO X D, MA L N, LIANG Y, et al.Simultaneous immobilization of lead and atrazine in contaminated soils using dairy-manure biochar[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(11): 4884-4889
[34]	喻阳华, 陈程, 吴永贵, 等.红枫湖沉积物大容积高水位条件下薄层覆盖材料的污染原位控制效果[J].环境工程学报, 2016, 10(2):689-696

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 1465
HTML全文浏览数: 1190
PDF下载数: 683
施引文献: 0

撒施阻控材料快速去除上覆水Cd对的室内模拟研究

Laboratory simulation study on Cd rapid removal from the overlying water through scattering resistance materials

计量

撒施阻控材料快速去除上覆水Cd对的室内模拟研究

English Abstract

Laboratory simulation study on Cd rapid removal from the overlying water through scattering resistance materials

全文HTML

目录

撒施阻控材料快速去除上覆水Cd对的室内模拟研究

Laboratory simulation study on Cd rapid removal from the overlying water through scattering resistance materials

计量

出版历程

撒施阻控材料快速去除上覆水Cd对的室内模拟研究

English Abstract

Laboratory simulation study on Cd rapid removal from the overlying water through scattering resistance materials

全文HTML

目录