倒置A2/O与常规A2/O工艺除磷效果对比

金鹏康, 郑未元, 王先宝, 张雨, 王晓昌, 孙红芳. 倒置A2/O与常规A2/O工艺除磷效果对比[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(2): 501-505. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150201
引用本文: 金鹏康, 郑未元, 王先宝, 张雨, 王晓昌, 孙红芳. 倒置A2/O与常规A2/O工艺除磷效果对比[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(2): 501-505. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150201
Jin Pengkang, Zheng Weiyuan, Wang Xianbao, Zhang Yu, Wang Xiaochang, Sun Hongfang. Comparison of phosphorus removal efficiency between reversed and conventional A2/O processes[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 501-505. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150201
Citation: Jin Pengkang, Zheng Weiyuan, Wang Xianbao, Zhang Yu, Wang Xiaochang, Sun Hongfang. Comparison of phosphorus removal efficiency between reversed and conventional A2/O processes[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 501-505. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150201

倒置A2/O与常规A2/O工艺除磷效果对比

  • 基金项目:

    陕西省科技统筹创新工程(2011KTZB03-03-03)

    国家"水体污染控制与治理"科技重大专项(2011ZX07302-001)

    陕西省创新团队项目(IRT 2013KCT-13)

    新世纪优秀人才项目(NCET-12-1043)

    西安市科技计划项目(CX12160)

  • 中图分类号: X703

Comparison of phosphorus removal efficiency between reversed and conventional A2/O processes

  • Fund Project:
  • 摘要: 通过对西安市某污水处理厂倒置A2/O工艺的沿程监测和工艺解析,分析明确了该工艺生物除磷效果差的影响因素。研究表明,缺氧池反硝化不完全,厌氧池高浓度硝酸盐是抑制聚磷菌释磷的重要因素。当厌氧池内硝酸盐浓度大于4 mg/L时会明显抑制生物除磷效果。硝酸盐的浓度在1~4 mg/L时,随着硝酸盐浓度的升高,释磷效果显著降低。为避免硝酸盐对聚磷菌的影响,需将厌氧池硝酸盐浓度控制在1 mg/L以下。硝酸盐对聚磷菌释磷的影响原因是生物脱氮除磷对碳源的竞争,以乙酸钠和原污水为碳源分析硝氮盐对释磷效果的影响。结果表明,易于生物降解的优质碳源更有利于聚磷菌在厌氧环境下释磷,倒置A2/O的前置式缺氧池首先将大量优质碳源用于反硝化,而造成后续厌氧池聚磷菌释磷效果差。针对这一研究结果,对该污水厂提出将倒置A2/O调整为常规A2/O的改造方案,改造后厌氧池硝酸盐浓度由3.57 mg/L降低至0.89 mg/L,聚磷菌释磷量提高1.8倍,系统除磷效果增强,出水总磷降低至0.66 mg/L,与倒置A2/O相比降低0.21 mg/L。
  • 加载中
  • [1] 张波, 高廷耀. 倒置A2/O工艺的原理与特点研究. 中国给水排水, 2000, 16(7): 11-15 Zhang Bo, Gao Tingyao. Principle and characteristics of reversed A2/O process. China Water & Wastewater, 2000, 16(7): 11-15(in Chinese)
    [2] 毕学军, 张波. 倒置A2/O 工艺生物脱氮除磷原理及其生产应用. 环境工程, 2006, 24(3): 29-30 Bi Xuejun, Zhang Bo. The principle and full-scale application of reversed A2/O process for removing nitrogen and phosphorus. Environmental Engineering, 2006, 24(3): 29-30(in Chinese)
    [3] 陈洪斌, 唐贤春, 何群彪, 等. 倒置AAO工艺聚磷微生物的吸磷行为. 中国环境科学, 2007, 27(1): 49-53 Cheng Hongbin, Tang Xianchun, He Qunbiao, et al. Phosphorus uptaking behavior of phosphorus accumulating organisms in reversed AAO Process. China Environmental Science, 2007, 27(1): 49-53(in Chinese)
    [4] Mulkerrins D., Dobson A. D. W., Colleran E. Parameters affecting biological phosphate removal from wastewaters. Environment International, 2004, 30(2): 120-125
    [5] 郑燕清, 周建华. 除磷工艺中厌氧释磷和好氧吸磷的影响因素. 中国市政工程, 2007, (1): 48-50 Zheng Yanqing, Zhou Jianhua. On influence factors of phosphorus release and uptake under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. China Municipal Engineering, 2007, (1): 48-50(in Chinese)
    [6] 侯红勋, 王淑莹, 闫骏, 等. 不同碳源类型对生物除磷过程释放磷的影响. 化工学报, 2007, 58(8):2081-2086 Hou Hongxun, Wang Shuying, Yan Jun, et al. Effect of different types carbon sources on phosphorus release in enhanced biological phosphorus removal process. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China), 2007, 58(8): 2081-2086(in Chinese)
    [7] 娄金生, 谢水波, 何少华, 等. 生物脱氮除磷原理与应用. 长沙: 国防科技大学出版社, 2002
    [8] 王振江, 武鹏鬼, 毕学军. 倒置A2/O生物脱氮除磷工艺的生产性实验. 中国给水排水, 2006, 22(19): 36-38, 43 Wang Zhenjiang, Wu Penggui, Bi Xuejun. Productive test on nitrogen and phosphorus removal by reversed A2/O process. China Water & Wastewater, 2006, 22(19): 36-38, 43(in Chinese)
    [9] 徐伟锋, 陈银广, 顾国维, 等. A2/O 污水处理工艺中基质转化机理研究. 环境科学, 2006, 27(11): 2229-2232 Xu Weifeng, Chen Yinguang, Gu Guowei, et al. Research on substrate transformation mechanism in A2/O process. Environmental Science, 2006, 27(11): 2229-2232(in Chinese)
    [10] 王荣斌, 李军, 张宁, 等. 污水生物除磷技术研究进展. 环境工程, 2007, 25(1): 84-88 Wang Rongbin, Li Jun, Zhang Ning, et al. Development of biological phosphorus removal in wastewater treatment process. Environmental Engineering, 2007, 25(1): 84-88(in Chinese)
    [11] 尹军, 王建辉, 王雪峰, 等. 污水生物除磷若干影响因素分析. 环境工程学报, 2007, 1(4): 6-11 Yin Jun, Wang Jianhui, Wang Xuefeng, et al. Influencing factors of biological phosphorus removal in sewage treatment. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2007, 1(4): 6-11(in Chinese)
    [12] Saito T., Brdjanovic D., Van Loosdrecht M. C. M. Effect of nitrite on phosphate uptake by phosphate accumulating organisms. Water Research, 2004, 38(17): 3760-3768
    [13] 邹华, 阮文权, 陈坚. 硝酸盐在除磷脱氮中的作用. 食品与生物技术, 2002, 21(1): 10-14 Zou Hua, Ruan Wenquan, Chen Jian. The role of nitrate in the removal of nitrogen and phosphate. Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology, 2002, 21(1): 10-14(in Chinese)
    [14] Akin B. S., Ugurlu A. The effect of an anoxic zone on biological phosphorus removal by a sequential batch reactor. Bioresource Technology, 2004, 94(1): 1-7
    [15] Chen Yongzhi, Peng Chengyao, Wang Jianhua, et al. Effect of nitrate recycling ratio on simultaneous biological nutrient removal in a novel anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A2/O)-biological aerated filter (BAF) system. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(10): 5722-5727
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  3136
  • HTML全文浏览数:  2205
  • PDF下载数:  1037
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-04-16
  • 刊出日期:  2015-02-07

倒置A2/O与常规A2/O工艺除磷效果对比

  • 1. 西安建筑科技大学环境与市政工程学院, 西安 710055
  • 2. 西安市污水处理有限责任公司, 西安 710000
基金项目:

陕西省科技统筹创新工程(2011KTZB03-03-03)

国家"水体污染控制与治理"科技重大专项(2011ZX07302-001)

陕西省创新团队项目(IRT 2013KCT-13)

新世纪优秀人才项目(NCET-12-1043)

西安市科技计划项目(CX12160)

摘要: 通过对西安市某污水处理厂倒置A2/O工艺的沿程监测和工艺解析,分析明确了该工艺生物除磷效果差的影响因素。研究表明,缺氧池反硝化不完全,厌氧池高浓度硝酸盐是抑制聚磷菌释磷的重要因素。当厌氧池内硝酸盐浓度大于4 mg/L时会明显抑制生物除磷效果。硝酸盐的浓度在1~4 mg/L时,随着硝酸盐浓度的升高,释磷效果显著降低。为避免硝酸盐对聚磷菌的影响,需将厌氧池硝酸盐浓度控制在1 mg/L以下。硝酸盐对聚磷菌释磷的影响原因是生物脱氮除磷对碳源的竞争,以乙酸钠和原污水为碳源分析硝氮盐对释磷效果的影响。结果表明,易于生物降解的优质碳源更有利于聚磷菌在厌氧环境下释磷,倒置A2/O的前置式缺氧池首先将大量优质碳源用于反硝化,而造成后续厌氧池聚磷菌释磷效果差。针对这一研究结果,对该污水厂提出将倒置A2/O调整为常规A2/O的改造方案,改造后厌氧池硝酸盐浓度由3.57 mg/L降低至0.89 mg/L,聚磷菌释磷量提高1.8倍,系统除磷效果增强,出水总磷降低至0.66 mg/L,与倒置A2/O相比降低0.21 mg/L。

English Abstract

参考文献 (15)

目录

/

返回文章
返回