高级搜索

AP-42道路交通扬尘排放模型评估及其在北京市的应用

,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

樊守彬, 张东旭, 田灵娣. AP-42道路交通扬尘排放模型评估及其在北京市的应用[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(5): 2501-2506. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412180
引用本文: 樊守彬, 张东旭, 田灵娣. AP-42道路交通扬尘排放模型评估及其在北京市的应用[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(5): 2501-2506. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412180
shu
Fan Shoubin, Zhang Dongxu, Tian Lingdi. Assessment for AP-42 model of road dust emissions and its application in Beijing, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(5): 2501-2506. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412180
Citation: Fan Shoubin, Zhang Dongxu, Tian Lingdi. Assessment for AP-42 model of road dust emissions and its application in Beijing, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(5): 2501-2506. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412180
shu

AP-42道路交通扬尘排放模型评估及其在北京市的应用

  • 1.

    北京市环境保护科学研究院, 北京 100037

  • 2.

    国家城市环境污染控制工程技术研究中心, 北京 100037

  • 3.

    首都师范大学资源环境与旅游学院, 北京 100048

  • 基金项目:

    国家科技支撑计划项目(2013BAC17B03)

    国家环保公益性行业科研专项(201409004)

    北京市环境保护科学研究院科技基金项目(2013-B-04)

  • 中图分类号: X701

Assessment for AP-42 model of road dust emissions and its application in Beijing, China

  • 1.

    Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100037, China

  • 2.

    National Engineering Research Center of Urban Environmental Pollution Control, Beijing 100037, China

  • 3.

    College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

  • Fund Project:

摘要

  • 摘要: 对EPA推导AP-42模型的源数据划分范围,评估不同积尘负荷范围的线性回归模型的模拟效果。结果显示,在不同积尘负荷范围内(0~0.5、0.5~1、0~1、0~4和5~400 g/m2),线性回归模型参数以及方程R2值均有差异。对182个北京市道路积尘样品进行频数分布分析,发现积尘负荷主要分布在0~0.5 g/m2或0~1 g/m2范围内,分别运用道路积尘负荷0~0.5、0.5~1和0~1 g/m2范围的模拟回归模型,评估北京市铺装道路PM10的排放特征,尽管3个不同模型评估结果的平均值的比例是4:2:1,但是3个模型评估不同类型道路PM10排放因子的大小顺序是:支路> 次干道> 主干道> 快速路。
    Abstract: The source data of AP-42 modeling and inventories (the compilation of air pollutant emission factors) compiled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was divided into different ranges of silt loading, and the simulation effects of linear regression modeling for every range were evaluated. The results showed that there were discrepancies both in parameters of the linear regression models and the value of R2 from the equations in the silt loading range of 0 to 0.5, 0.5 to 1, 0 to 1, 0 to 4 and 5 to 400 g/m2, respectively. It was found that the distribution of silt loading was mainly between 0 to 0.5 g/m2 or 0 to 1 g/m2 according to the frequency distribution analysis of silt loading samples, which were sampled from 182 different roads in Beijing, China. The PM10 emission characteristics of paved roads in Beijing were evaluated using the simulated regression model for the silt loading range of 0 to 0.5, 0.5 to 1 and 0 to 1 g/m2, respectively. Although the ratio of the average assessment values from three different models was 4:2:1, the PM10 emission factors decreased similarly across different road types in the order collector > minor arterial > major arterial > freeway.
  • [1] Norman M., Johansson C. Studies of some measures to reduce road dust emissions from paved roads in Scandinavia. Atmospheric Environment, 2006, 40(32): 6154-6164
    [2] EPA. Emission factor documentation for AP-42, section 13.2.1 paved roads. Washington, DC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011: 1-13
    [3] Gaffney P., Bode R., Murchison L. PM10 emission inventory improvement program for California. 2020L Street, Sacramento, CA: Patrick Gaffney, Air Resources Board, 1995: 95814
    [4] Song Yu, Zhang Minsi, Cai Xuhui. PM10 modeling of Beijing in the winter. Atmospheric Environment, 2006, 40(22): 4126-4136
    [5] Song Yu, Zhang Yuanhang, Xie Shaodong, et al. Source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing by positive matrix factorization. Atmospheric Environment, 2006, 40(8): 1526-1537
    [6] Kuhns H., Etyemezian V., Green M., et al. Vehicle-based road dust emission measurement: Part II: Effect of precipitation, wintertime road sanding, and street sweepers on inferred PM10 emission potentials from paved and unpaved roads. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37(32): 4573-4582
    [7] Green M. C., Chow J. C., Chang M. C. O., et al. Source apportionment of atmospheric particulate carbon in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. Particuology, 2013, 11(1): 110-118
    [8] Rutter A. P., Snyder D. C., Schauer J. J., et al. Contributions of resuspended soil and road dust to organic carbon in fine particulate matter in the Midwestern US. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45(2): 514-518
    [9] Karanasiou A., Moreno T., Amato F., et al. Road dust contribution to PM levels:Evaluation of the effectiveness of street washing activities by means of Positive Matrix Factorization. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45(13): 2193-2201
    [10] US EPA. National air pollutant emission trends, 1900-1998. Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, USEPA, 2000: 2-11
    [11] CARB. 1996 Emission inventory. Sacramento, CA: CARB, 1998: 1-10
    [12] Kuhns H., Etyemezian V., Landwehr D., et al. Testing re-entrained aerosol kinetic emissions from roads: A new approach to infer silt loading on roadways. Atmospheric Environment, 2001, 35(16): 2815-2825
    [13] Pant P., Harrison R. M. Estimation of the contribution of road traffic emissions to particulate matter concentrations from field measurements: A review. Atmospheric Environment, 2013, 77: 78-97
    [14] Venkatram A. A critique of empirical emission factor models: A case study of the AP-42 model for estimating PM10 emissions from paved roads. Atmospheric Environment, 2000, 34(1): 1-11
    [15] Airborne Particles Expert Group. Source Apportionment of Airborne Particulate Matter in The United Kingdom. Wokingham: Transport Research Laboratory, 1999: 1-10
    [16] Düring I., Jacob J., Lohmeyer A., et al. Estimation of the "non exhaust pipe" PM10 emissions of streets for practical traffic air pollution modelling//Sturm P., Minarikp S. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium, Transport and Air Pollution. Graz, Austria: Graz University of Technology, 2002: 309-316
    [17] 樊守彬, 田刚, 李钢, 等. 北京铺装道路交通扬尘排放规律研究. 环境科学, 2007, 28(10): 2396-2399 Fan Shoubin, Tian Gang, Li Gang, et al. Emission characteristics of paved roads fugitive dust in Beijing. Environmental Science, 2007, 28(10): 2396-2399(in Chinese)
    [18] 许妍, 周启星. 天津城市交通道路扬尘排放特征及空间分布研究. 中国环境科学, 2012, 32(12): 2168-2173 Xu Yan, Zhou Qixing. Emission characteristics and spatial distribution of road fugitive dust in Tianjin, China. China Environmental Science, 2012, 32(12): 2168-2173(in Chinese)
    [19] 彭康, 杨杨, 郑君瑜, 等. 珠江三角洲地区铺装道路扬尘排放因子与排放清单研究. 环境科学学报, 2013, 33(10): 2657-2663 Peng Kang, Yang Yang, Zheng Junyu, et al. Emission factor and inventory of paved road fugitive dust sources in the Pearl River Delta region. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2013, 33(10): 2657-2663(in Chinese)
    [20] Cowherd Jr C., Englehart P. J. Paved road particulate emissions. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1984: 8-30
    [21] Nicholson K. A critique of empirical emission factor models: A case study of the AP-42 model for estimating PM10 emissions from paved roads. Atmospheric Environment, 2001, 35(1): 185-186
    [22] EPA. Emission factor documentation for AP-42, section 13.2.1, Paved Roads. Research Triangle Park, NC: Midwest Research Institute, 1993: 1-12
    [23] Zimmer R. A., Reeser W. K., Cummins P. Evaluation of PM10 emission factors for paved streets//Chow J. C., Ono D. M. PM10 Standards and Nontraditional Particulate Source Controls. Pittsburgh, PA: Air Waste Management Association, 1992: 311-323
    [24] Kantamaneni R., Adams G., Bamesberger L., et al. The measurement of roadway PM10 emission rates using atmospheric tracer ratio techniques. Atmospheric Environment, 1996, 30(24): 4209-4223
    [25] Ashbaugh L., Chang D., Flocchini R. G., et al. Traffic Generated PM10 "Hot Spots". Davis, CA: Air Quality Group, Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, University of California, 1996

  • 期刊类型引用(14)

    1. 王海斌，樊守彬，韩力慧，李婷婷，曲松，崔浩然，刘俊芳. 北京市通州区秋季典型工地出口道路尘负荷排放特征. 环境工程技术学报. 2022(01): 6-14 . 百度学术
    2. 马彤，巴利萌，孙璐萍，刘佳媛，王杰，程晓夏，郑易飞，高健. 基于光散射快速检测法的渭南市道路积尘研究. 大气与环境光学学报. 2022(03): 336-346 . 百度学术
    3. 崔浩然，樊守彬，韩力慧，李婷婷，曲松，刘俊芳，王海斌. 北京市大兴区道路积尘年际变化特征及管控研究. 中国环境科学. 2021(10): 4556-4564 . 百度学术
    4. 刘俊芳，樊守彬，郭秀锐，崔浩然，申亚倩. 基于车载移动监测的北京市丰台区道路扬尘源排放特征. 环境科学学报. 2021(11): 4423-4429 . 百度学术
    5. 王凯，樊守彬，孙改红，亓浩雲. 基于行驶里程的北京市延庆区机动车排放清单建立及特征分析. 环境工程技术学报. 2019(02): 119-125 . 百度学术
    6. 樊守彬，杨涛，王凯，李雪峰. 道路扬尘排放因子建立方法与应用. 环境科学. 2019(04): 1664-1669 . 百度学术
    7. 谢磊，丁艳纯，史玲. 衡阳市主城区道路扬尘排放特征及影响因素. 环境保护与循环经济. 2019(04): 69-74 . 百度学术
    8. 刘嘉明，狄育慧，梅源，王雪艳. 土方工程施工扬尘排放研究进展. 制冷与空调(四川). 2019(04): 449-456 . 百度学术
    9. 亓浩雲，樊守彬，王凯. 北京市不同功能区机动车排放特征研究. 环境污染与防治. 2019(09): 1056-1063+1069 . 百度学术
    10. 樊守彬，郭津津，李雪峰. 区县尺度机动车高分辨率排放清单建立方法及应用. 环境科学. 2018(05): 2015-2022 . 百度学术
    11. 樊守彬，郭津津，李雪峰. 基于路网车流量的北京城市副中心机动车污染控制情景. 环境科学. 2018(08): 3571-3579 . 百度学术
    12. 崔华胜，王晓燕，冯伟，孙晨阳. 袋式真空吸尘器与水过滤式真空吸尘器道路尘土收集方法对比研究. 环境卫生工程. 2018(01): 48-51+55 . 百度学术
    13. 刘奥博，吴其重，陈雅婷，赵天成，程晓. 北京市平原区裸露地风蚀扬尘排放量. 中国环境科学. 2018(02): 471-477 . 百度学术
    14. 孙昱昌，吴竞妍，高凯，张亮，王同亮，施国萍. 基于GIS的城市智能环卫监测系统设计. 科技视界. 2017(23): 126-128+119 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(9)

  • 加载中
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7访问量Chart context menu近一年内文章摘要浏览量、全文浏览量、PDF下载量统计信息摘要浏览量全文浏览量PDF下载量2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-050Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menu访问类别分布DOWNLOAD: 2.9 %DOWNLOAD: 2.9 %FULLTEXT: 89.8 %FULLTEXT: 89.8 %META: 7.3 %META: 7.3 %DOWNLOADFULLTEXTMETAHighcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menu访问地区分布其他: 93.1 %其他: 93.1 %Ashburn: 0.4 %Ashburn: 0.4 %Beijing: 0.8 %Beijing: 0.8 %Guangzhou Shi: 0.2 %Guangzhou Shi: 0.2 %Mountain View: 0.2 %Mountain View: 0.2 %Newark: 0.2 %Newark: 0.2 %Shijiazhuang: 0.4 %Shijiazhuang: 0.4 %XX: 1.5 %XX: 1.5 %Yuncheng: 0.2 %Yuncheng: 0.2 %内网IP: 0.8 %内网IP: 0.8 %北京: 0.8 %北京: 0.8 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %连云港: 0.2 %连云港: 0.2 %郑州: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %其他AshburnBeijingGuangzhou ShiMountain ViewNewarkShijiazhuangXXYuncheng内网IP北京昆明连云港郑州Highcharts.com
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1680
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1377
  • PDF下载数:  762
  • 施引文献:  23
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-01-06
  • 刊出日期:  2016-06-03
樊守彬, 张东旭, 田灵娣. AP-42道路交通扬尘排放模型评估及其在北京市的应用[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(5): 2501-2506. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412180
引用本文: 樊守彬, 张东旭, 田灵娣. AP-42道路交通扬尘排放模型评估及其在北京市的应用[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(5): 2501-2506. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412180
shu
Fan Shoubin, Zhang Dongxu, Tian Lingdi. Assessment for AP-42 model of road dust emissions and its application in Beijing, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(5): 2501-2506. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412180
Citation: Fan Shoubin, Zhang Dongxu, Tian Lingdi. Assessment for AP-42 model of road dust emissions and its application in Beijing, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(5): 2501-2506. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412180
shu

AP-42道路交通扬尘排放模型评估及其在北京市的应用

  • 1.  北京市环境保护科学研究院, 北京 100037
  • 2.  国家城市环境污染控制工程技术研究中心, 北京 100037
  • 3.  首都师范大学资源环境与旅游学院, 北京 100048
  • 收稿日期:  2015-01-06
基金项目:

国家科技支撑计划项目(2013BAC17B03)

国家环保公益性行业科研专项(201409004)

北京市环境保护科学研究院科技基金项目(2013-B-04)

摘要: 对EPA推导AP-42模型的源数据划分范围,评估不同积尘负荷范围的线性回归模型的模拟效果。结果显示,在不同积尘负荷范围内(0~0.5、0.5~1、0~1、0~4和5~400 g/m2),线性回归模型参数以及方程R2值均有差异。对182个北京市道路积尘样品进行频数分布分析,发现积尘负荷主要分布在0~0.5 g/m2或0~1 g/m2范围内,分别运用道路积尘负荷0~0.5、0.5~1和0~1 g/m2范围的模拟回归模型,评估北京市铺装道路PM10的排放特征,尽管3个不同模型评估结果的平均值的比例是4:2:1,但是3个模型评估不同类型道路PM10排放因子的大小顺序是:支路> 次干道> 主干道> 快速路。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (25)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心