裹包青贮提高玉米秸秆厌氧消化效率的实验研究

宋成军, 陈羚, 齐岳, 罗娟, 赵学兰, 田宜水, 赵立欣. 裹包青贮提高玉米秸秆厌氧消化效率的实验研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(5): 2660-2666. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412088
引用本文: 宋成军, 陈羚, 齐岳, 罗娟, 赵学兰, 田宜水, 赵立欣. 裹包青贮提高玉米秸秆厌氧消化效率的实验研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(5): 2660-2666. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412088
Song Chengjun, Chen Ling, Qi Yue, Luo Juan, Zhao Xuelan, Tian Yishui, Zhao Lixin. Round bale silage on anaerobic fermentation efficiency of corn straw[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(5): 2660-2666. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412088
Citation: Song Chengjun, Chen Ling, Qi Yue, Luo Juan, Zhao Xuelan, Tian Yishui, Zhao Lixin. Round bale silage on anaerobic fermentation efficiency of corn straw[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(5): 2660-2666. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412088

裹包青贮提高玉米秸秆厌氧消化效率的实验研究

  • 基金项目:

    农业科技成果转化资金项目(2012GB23260547)

  • 中图分类号: X705

Round bale silage on anaerobic fermentation efficiency of corn straw

  • Fund Project:
  • 摘要: 秸秆是重要的沼气工程原料,秸秆预处理对其后续厌氧消化效率影响巨大。采用田间裹包青贮方法,设计3因素正交实验,考察了秸秆含水率、压缩比和添加剂对玉米秸秆发酵时间和厌氧消化产沼气的影响。结果表明:秸秆经过裹包青贮,发酵总时间(total fermentation time,TFT)减少1~2 d,累积产气量达到总产气量的90%所用时间(TFT90%)减少了40%~50%,消化效率明显提高;秸秆含水率对产气效果有明显影响,随着含水率增加,单位总固体(total solid,TS)累计产气量(cumulative biogas yields per TS,CBYT)和沼气日产率(biogas yields rate average day,BYR)由高到低排序为:35%~40%,40%~45%,30%~35%;秸秆压缩比对产气效果有明显影响,随着压缩比的增加,其对CBY和BYR的效应由高到低排序为:185、143与138 kg/m3;添加剂类型对产气效果亦有明显影响,在不同添加剂处理下,其对CBYT和BYR的效应由高到低排序为:尿素处理>甲酸处理>无添加剂处理;正交实验极差分析表明,对CBYT和BYR的影响排序为:含水率﹥压缩比﹥添加剂,其田间裹包青贮进行厌氧发酵的优化组合为:青贮秸秆含水率为35%~40%,压缩比为185 kg/m3,添加剂为营养型,青贮20 d,CBYT和BYR达到最大,分别为646.57 mL/g和173.25 mL/(d·g)。
  • [1] 崔文文, 梁军锋, 杜连柱, 等. 中国规模化秸秆沼气工程现状及存在问题. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(11): 121-125 Cui Wenwen, Liang Junfeng, Du Lianzhu, et al. The current situation and problems of the large-scale biogas plants for straw in China. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(11): 121-125(in Chinese)
    [2] 董保成, 陈羚, 张玉华, 等. 猪粪对秸秆一体化两相厌氧产气的影响. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(S): 48-52 Dong Baocheng, Chen Ling, Zhang Yuhua, et al. Effect of pig manure addition on biogas production of combined two-phase anaerobic digestion. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2011, 27(S): 48-52(in Chinese)
    [3] 卞永存, 寇巍, 李世密, 等. 农作物秸秆两相厌氧发酵工艺研究进展. 可再生能源, 2009, 27(5): 61-65 Bian Yongcun, Kou Wei, Li Shimi, et al. Study on the status of two-phase anaerobic fermentation for crop straws. Renewable Energy, 2009, 27(5): 61-65(in Chinese)
    [4] 胡斌, 张亮亮, 胡青平. 超声波预处理玉米秸秆的条件优化. 西北农业学报, 2012, 21(2): 153-156 Hu Bin, Zhang Liangliang, Hu Qingping. Optimization of ultrasonic pretreatment for corn straw. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2012, 21(2): 153-156(in Chinese)
    [5] 徐桂转, 范帅尧, 王新锋, 等. 汽爆预处理青玉米秸秆厌氧发酵特性. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(13): 205-210 Xu Guizhuan, Fan Shuaiyao, Wang Xinfeng, et al. Anaerobic fermentation characteristic of green corn straw pretreated by steam explosion. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(13): 205-210(in Chinese)
    [6] 覃国栋, 刘荣厚, 孙辰. NaOH预处理对水稻秸秆沼气发酵的影响. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(增刊1): 59-63 Qin Guodong, Liu Ronghou, Sun Chen. Effects of different concentrations of NaOH pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of rice straw for biogas production. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011, 27(Supp. 1): 59-63(in Chinese)
    [7] 徐龙君, 安丽娜, 农丽薇, 等. 稀盐酸预处理对稻草厌氧消化的影响. 环境工程学报, 2011, 5(3): 671-674 Xu Longjun, An Lina, Nong Liwei, et al. Effect of pretreatment of dilute hydrochloric acid on anaerobic digestion of rice straw. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2011, 5(3): 671-674(in Chinese)
    [8] 袁旭峰, 高瑞芳, 李培培, 等. 复合菌系MC1预处理对玉米秸秆厌氧发酵产甲烷效率的提高. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(9): 266-270 Yuan Xufeng, Gao Ruifang, Li Peipei, et al. Improvment of anaerobic biogasification efficiency by pretreatment of corn straw with composite microbial system of MC1. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011, 27(9): 266-270(in Chinese)
    [9] 王阳, 林聪, 侯锦, 等. 添加菌体蛋白和尿素对玉米秸秆厌氧发酵的影响. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(增刊 1): 74-78 Wang Yang, Lin Cong, Hou Jin, et al. Effects of bacterial protein and urea addition on straw anaerobic fermentation. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011, 27(Supp. 1): 74-78(in Chinese)
    [10] Clarkson W. W., Xiao W. Bench-scale anaerobic bioconversion of newsprint and office paper. Water Science and Technology, 2000, 41(3): 93-100
    [11] Xiao Bing, Sun Xiaofeng, Sun Runcang. Chemical, structural, and thermal characterizations of alkali-soluble lignins and hemicelluloses, and cellulose from maize stems, rye straw, and rice straw. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2011, 74(2): 307-319
    [12] 赵政, 李旭. 乳酸菌和纤维素酶对早籼稻秸秆青贮饲料品质的实验. 饲料工业, 2010, 31(17): 24-25 Zhao Zheng, Li Xu. Experiment of lactobacillus and cellulase on the quality of early indica rice stover silage. Feed Industry, 2010, 31(17): 24-25(in Chinese)
    [13] 周玮, 董保成, 齐岳. 不同处理秸秆中温厌氧发酵的产气效果. 中国沼气, 2010, 28(3): 22-24 Zhou Wei, Dong Baocheng, Qi Yue. The gas productions of different treated straw under mesophilic and anaerobic condition. China Biogas, 2010, 28(3): 22-24(in Chinese)
    [14] 陈娥英, 庄益芬, 张文昌. 添加剂、含水率对象草青贮品质的影响. 中国草地学报, 2007, 29(5): 84-88 Chen Eying, Zhuang Yifen, Zhang Wenchang. The effects of additives, moisture content of material on quality of Napier grass silage. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2007, 29(5): 84-88(in Chinese)
    [15] CMP Information Ltd. The Latest fixed chamber balers on offer. Farmers Guardian, Apr. 8, 2005: 72
    [16] CMP Information Ltd. Machinery focus is on baled silage. Farmers Guardian, May 16, 2003: 16
    [17] 王丹, 杨中平. 全株玉米秸秆压缩打捆袋装青贮技术的研究. 湖北农业科学, 2010, 49(1): 177-179 Wang Dan, Yang Zhongping. Research on technique for compressed packaged silage of whole-plant corn stalk. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 49(1): 177-179(in Chinese)
    [18] 陈兴丽, 周建斌, 刘建亮, 等. 不同施肥处理对玉米秸秆碳氮比及其矿化特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(2): 314-319 Chen Xingli, Zhou Jianbin, Liu Jianliang, et al. Effects of fertilization on carbon/nitrogen ratio of maize straw and its mineralization in soil. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20(2): 314-319(in Chinese)
    [19] 陈斯, 熊承永. 再谈秸秆沼气发酵的碳氮比. 中国沼 气, 2009, 27(2): 38-39 Chen Si, Xiong Chengyong. Discuss again on carbon/nitrogen ratio of straw stalk anaerobic fermentation. China Biogas, 2009, 27(2): 38-39(in Chinese)
    [20] 蒋建国, 娄志颖, 赵振振, 等. 添加污泥饼补充氮源的农作物秸秆高固体厌氧消化启动研究. 环境科学, 2009, 30(1): 297-301 Jiang Jianguo, Lou Zhiying, Zhao Zhenzhen, et al. Start-up of high solid anaerobic digestion process for treating straw with sludge cake as nitrogen additive. Environmental Science, 2009, 30(1): 297-301(in Chinese)
    [21] 张昌爱, 刘英, 黄萌, 等. 秸秆原料C/N比调节对沼气产气状况的影响. 山东农业科学, 2010(1): 67-70 Zhang Chang'ai, Liu Ying, Huang Meng, et al. Effect of C/N adjustment of corn stalk on methane production. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2010(1): 67-70(in Chinese)
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1957
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1636
  • PDF下载数:  752
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-12-26
  • 刊出日期:  2016-06-03
宋成军, 陈羚, 齐岳, 罗娟, 赵学兰, 田宜水, 赵立欣. 裹包青贮提高玉米秸秆厌氧消化效率的实验研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(5): 2660-2666. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412088
引用本文: 宋成军, 陈羚, 齐岳, 罗娟, 赵学兰, 田宜水, 赵立欣. 裹包青贮提高玉米秸秆厌氧消化效率的实验研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(5): 2660-2666. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412088
Song Chengjun, Chen Ling, Qi Yue, Luo Juan, Zhao Xuelan, Tian Yishui, Zhao Lixin. Round bale silage on anaerobic fermentation efficiency of corn straw[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(5): 2660-2666. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412088
Citation: Song Chengjun, Chen Ling, Qi Yue, Luo Juan, Zhao Xuelan, Tian Yishui, Zhao Lixin. Round bale silage on anaerobic fermentation efficiency of corn straw[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(5): 2660-2666. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201412088

裹包青贮提高玉米秸秆厌氧消化效率的实验研究

  • 1. 农业部规划设计研究院农村能源与环保研究所, 农业部农业废弃物能源化利用重点实验室, 北京 100125
  • 2. 浙江农林大学暨阳学院, 诸暨 311800
  • 3. 天津生物工程职业技术学院, 天津 300074
基金项目:

农业科技成果转化资金项目(2012GB23260547)

摘要: 秸秆是重要的沼气工程原料,秸秆预处理对其后续厌氧消化效率影响巨大。采用田间裹包青贮方法,设计3因素正交实验,考察了秸秆含水率、压缩比和添加剂对玉米秸秆发酵时间和厌氧消化产沼气的影响。结果表明:秸秆经过裹包青贮,发酵总时间(total fermentation time,TFT)减少1~2 d,累积产气量达到总产气量的90%所用时间(TFT90%)减少了40%~50%,消化效率明显提高;秸秆含水率对产气效果有明显影响,随着含水率增加,单位总固体(total solid,TS)累计产气量(cumulative biogas yields per TS,CBYT)和沼气日产率(biogas yields rate average day,BYR)由高到低排序为:35%~40%,40%~45%,30%~35%;秸秆压缩比对产气效果有明显影响,随着压缩比的增加,其对CBY和BYR的效应由高到低排序为:185、143与138 kg/m3;添加剂类型对产气效果亦有明显影响,在不同添加剂处理下,其对CBYT和BYR的效应由高到低排序为:尿素处理>甲酸处理>无添加剂处理;正交实验极差分析表明,对CBYT和BYR的影响排序为:含水率﹥压缩比﹥添加剂,其田间裹包青贮进行厌氧发酵的优化组合为:青贮秸秆含水率为35%~40%,压缩比为185 kg/m3,添加剂为营养型,青贮20 d,CBYT和BYR达到最大,分别为646.57 mL/g和173.25 mL/(d·g)。

English Abstract

参考文献 (21)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回